Clinical Trials Logo

Ocular Motility Disorders clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Ocular Motility Disorders.

Filter by:
  • Active, not recruiting  
  • Page 1

NCT ID: NCT02207517 Active, not recruiting - Clinical trials for Convergence Insufficiency

Office-based Vision Therapy for Improving Reading and Attention in Children With Convergence Insufficiency

CITT-ART
Start date: May 2014
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

CITT-ART is a multicenter study (8 locations around the United States) of 324 children ages 9 to <14 years with symptomatic convergence insufficiency (CI). The purpose of this study is to see if office-based therapy for convergence insufficiency (CI) improves reading ability and attention. CI is an eye-teaming problem where the eyes would like to drift outward when reading or doing close work. When eyes drift out, double vision can happen. To prevent double vision one must use extra effort to keep the eyes from going out. This extra effort can cause symptoms that can interfere with reading and working comfortably at near. These symptoms often include eyestrain, blurred vision, headaches, double vision, and loss of place when reading or performing tasks at near. In a prior study we found that therapy improves these symptoms. In this study we are looking at whether the therapy improves reading and attention

NCT ID: NCT01868269 Active, not recruiting - Neuroblastoma Clinical Trials

Opsoclonus Myoclonus Syndrome/Dancing Eye Syndrome (OMS/DES) in Children With and Without Neuroblastoma (NBpos and NBneg)Opsoclonus Myoclonus Syndrome/Dancing Eye Syndrome (OMS/DES) in Children With and Without Neuroblastoma (NBpos and NBneg)

Start date: April 18, 2013
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

The OMS/DES study is a multinational European Trial for Children with the Opsoclonus Myoclonus Syndrome / Dancing Eye Syndrome. This trial brought on the way by specialists of the EPNS (European Paediatric Neurology Society), the GPOH (Gesellschaft für Pädiatrische Hematologic und Oncologie) and the SIOPEN (SIOP (International Society Oncology Pediatric) Europe Neuroblastoma). This protocol will investigate an escalating treatment schedule starting with a corticosteroid standard treatment with dexamethasone pulses (first step), which is followed, if response has been inadequate after 3 months of treatment, by the addition of CP (second step) and, if still no sufficient improvement, by the replacement of CP by Rituximab (third step). Treatment intensification is decided on the basis of standardized scoring of OMS/DES severity.

NCT ID: NCT00716066 Active, not recruiting - Myasthenia Gravis Clinical Trials

Autologous Stem Cell Transplant for Neurologic Autoimmune Diseases

Start date: June 2008
Phase: Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

This phase II trial studies the side effects and how well carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine and melphalan together with antithymocyte globulin before a stem cell transplant works in treating patients with autoimmune neurologic disease that did not respond to previous therapy. In autoimmune neurological diseases, the patient's own immune system 'attacks' the nervous system which might include the brain/spinal cord and/or the peripheral nerves. Giving high-dose chemotherapy, including carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan, and antithymocyte globulin, before a stem cell transplant weakens the immune system and may help stop the immune system from 'attacking' a patient's nervous system. When the patient's own (autologous) stem cells are infused into the patient they help the bone marrow make red blood cells, white blood cells, and platelets so the blood counts can improve.

NCT ID: NCT00338611 Active, not recruiting - Clinical trials for Convergence Insufficiency

Convergence Insufficiency Treatment Trial (CITT)

Start date: July 2005
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

The purposes of the CITT are: - To determine whether Home-based Pencil Push-up therapy, Home-based Pencil Push-ups with Computer Vision Therapy/Orthoptics or Office-based VT/Orthoptics more effective than placebo treatment, and whether there are differences between the three treatments in improving subject symptoms and signs. - To evaluate whether improvements in outcome measures are still present after one year of observation.