View clinical trials related to Occupational Health.
Filter by:This study; It was planned to (1) determine the effect of surgical smoke on indoor air quality and (2) examine its effect on physical symptoms and throat culture results in operating room employees and compare it with those working in internal units.
The aim is to investigate whether an internet-based compassion course of five modules contributes to reducing stress of conscience and work-related stress, increase the experience of professional quality of life and self-compassion in healthcare professionals.
In Belgium, Periodic Health Screenings (PHS) are obliged by law for several occupations, including safety functions, jobs with heightened vigilance, work that involves physical, biological or chemical agents or tasks that are an ergonomic or mental burden. Scientifically it remains an open question whether these screenings guarantee the prevention of later health problems or problems with functioning at work. The objective of this study is to compare the cost-effectiveness of PHS with an online health screening tool with selective follow-up. In five Flemish hospitals, the employees eligible for PHS (exempting frequent exposure to ionizing radiation, preparation of cytostatics, or exposure to carcinogens, mutagens, or reprotoxic substances) are randomly assigned to a control group (receiving classical PHS at the occupational physician), or an intervention group (e-tool with selective follow-up by the physician). In the intervention group, 20% of the employees is seen by the occupational physician, based on their responses to the questionnaire. The intervention- and control group complete the questionnaire three times: before the study start (June 2019), in February 2020, and in September 2020. The study ends in March 2021. The survey is developed as part of the study. On the one hand it contains questions for the cost-effectiveness analysis: health care use, absenteeism and presenteeism, and health literacy. On the other hand, a validated questionnaire is developed based on a systematic review of existing validated and reliable instruments, a Delphi panel of occupational physicians, and a pilot- and field study that test the reliability and validity of the survey (and its referral to the occupational physician). For the latter, the employees' health, occupational risks, work ability, and lifestyle (alcohol abuse, drug abuse, physical activity, and nutrition) are surveyed. Access to the occupational physician remains guaranteed by means of an additional question ("Do you wish to discuss the results of your survey with the occupational physician?") and as spontaneous consultations with the occupational physicians remain possible before, during, and after the trial. The survey platform Qualtrics is used for data collection. Researchers have no insight in personal data, nor the medical files of employees, and only analyse the coded data from the surveys. Invitations for the survey are sent by the occupational physician. The coded questionnaires are saved on a KU Leuven survey, following the ISO-9001-procedure and the legal data storage period. The employer has no insight in the data. The study is performed by Jonas Steel, supervised by prof. dr. Jeroen Luyten and prof. dr. Lode Godderis, and financed by the Belgian Association for Occupational Physicians, and three external services for prevention and protection at work: IDEWE, Liantis, and Mensura.
Coronavirus has caused containment of more than half of the world's population and a major and rapid reorganization of clinical and support services. The spread of coronavirus (COVID-19) has posed significant challenges for occupational health services. However, there is currently no data on the influence of this epidemic on the practice and feelings of dental surgeons and associates
This study is the first that investigates the impact of a multi-component intervention combining current evidence of effective interventions with an adherence app to assess the potential benefits on productivity, neck pain, and headache.
This study evaluates the effects of the Labour Inspection Authority's regulatory tools on workplace exposures to prevent employee ill health. Norwegian municipal enterprises with employees in the home care sector have been randomized to three different experimental groups and to one control group. We hypothesize a significant lower level of work environmental exposures and health complaints, after adjusting for pre-intervention measures, in the experimental groups compared to the control group.
This study aim to evaluate the effectiveness of exercise at workplace for manual material handling workers. This is a randomized control trial study by cluster with three parallel groups (n=200). Participants will be randomized in three groups: (1) control group - will be receive ergonomics orientation . (2) Intervention group - exercise at workplace four times per week, during 15 minutes; (3) Intervention group 2 - exercise at workplace three times per week, during 15 minutes.Outcomes: The outcome measure will be verified in three moments at baseline, in six and eleven months of the intervention. The primary outcome is pain, electromyography. Secondary outcome is palmar dynamometer, BMI, physical activity level.
The goal of this research is to evaluate the efficacy of an audit and feedback intervention to improve personal protective equipment (PPE) use by nurses who handle hazardous drugs in the ambulatory oncology setting.
The purpose of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of intervention applying WHO Healthy Workplace Framework and Model to enhance the level of physical activity on employees. This research is an experimental intervention study recruiting two working types in four workplaces. Two working types are: (1) Working type A: Workers tend to be seated during work hours. Two telecommunications enterprises will respectively stand for the experiment group and the control group. (2) Working type B: Workers tend to be standing during work hours. Likewise, two different enterprises will respectively stand for the experiment group and the control group. Purposive sampling method will be used to select the experiment group. The intervention plan is to implement a cyclic or iterative process recommended by WHO.
Introduction: As employees spent most part of their time at the worksite, it provides a venue to address multiple individual risk factors and promote health. The America Heart Association (AHA) defined cardiovascular health using as metrics smoking status, body mass index, physical activity, diet, total cholesterol, blood pressure and fasting blood glucose. Objective: Evaluate Bayer employees' cardiovascular health according to the AHA definition and the acceptance to engage in lifestyle change programs. Methods: By the time of the annual occupational safety periodic medical examination, employees will receive an email with information about the cardiovascular health screening, exams requisition (fasting blood glucose and total cholesterol) and a copy of the written informed consent. If the employee accepts to participate, after providing a written informed consent, he will be evaluated according to the AHA cardiovascular health metrics. Data will be collected at the occupational safety electronic health record. After medical evaluation, employees will receive a printed feedback with their cardiovascular health score and will be referred to indicated lifestyle change programs (healthy weight, smoking cessation, diabetes control, high blood pressure control, dyslipidemia control). After 12 months we will evaluate the percentage of employees who accept to participate; prevalence of the cardiovascular risk factors and distribution according to the AHA classification in ideal, intermediate and poor; adherence to lifestyle change programs.