View clinical trials related to Obstetric Labor, Premature.
Filter by:The present IIT (Investigator-Initiated Trial) study is a prospective, randomised, placebo-controlled, double blind trial. Women hospitalised with signs of preterm birth can be recruited for the study. Participants will take study medication for 2 weeks (or until birth) and fill out a questionnaire at 3 time points (at baseline, after 1 week and after 2 weeks) to assess state of anxiety and sleep quality. Furthermore, information regarding adverse events and the further course of the pregnancy are recorded.
Most premature babies require oxygen therapy. There is uncertainty about what oxygen levels are the best. The oxygen levels in the blood are measured using a monitor called a saturation monitor and the oxygen the baby breathes is adjusted to keep the level in a target range. Although there is evidence that lower oxygen levels maybe harmful, it is not known how high they need to be for maximum benefit. Very high levels are also harmful. Saturation monitors are not very good for checking for high oxygen levels. For this a different kind of monitor, called a transcutaneous monitor, is better. Keeping oxygen levels stable is usually done by nurses adjusting the oxygen levels by hand (manual control). There is also equipment available that can do this automatically (servo control). It is not known which is best. Studies of automated control have shown that infants spend more time within their intended target oxygen saturation range. These have not included measurements of transcutaneous oxygen. There are no previous studies directly comparing automated respiratory devices. The investigators aim to show the transcutaneous oxygen levels as well as the oxygen saturation levels when babies have their oxygen adjusted using two automated (servo) control devices delivering nasal high flow. For a period of 12 hours each baby will have their oxygen adjusted automatically using each devices for 6 hours respectively. The investigators will compare the range of oxygen levels that are seen between the two respiratory devices.
The study is to evaluate the accuracy of a test device called "PAMG-1" to see if a pregnant women has ruptured membranes in comparison to standardly used testing methods.
To compare the duration of preterm induction of labor in women undergoing early vs. late or no artificial rupture of membranes (AROM). Maternal and neonatal outcomes will also be compared between the two groups.
Preterm birth (PTB) is a major cause of perinatal morbidity and mortality. Worldwide, about 15 million babies are born too soon every year, causing 1.1 million deaths, as well as short- and long-term disability in countless survivors. Different strategies have been studied for prevention of spontaneous PTB (SPTB) in randomized controlled trials (RCTs), including progesterone, cerclage, cervical pessary, as well as lifestyle modification, such as smoking cessation, diet, aerobic exercise, and nutritional supplements. Most successful effort to reduce the incidence of SPTB have focused on asympatomatic women with risk factors, such as prior SPTB or short cervix. However, most SPTB occur in symptomatic women, i.e. women with preterm labor (PTL). Women with arrested PTL are at increased risk of SPTB. The cervical pessary is a silicone device that has been used to prevent SPTB. The leading hypotheses for its mechanisms are two: that the pessary helps to keep the cervix closed, and that the pessary changes the inclination of the cervical canal so that the pregnancy weight is not directly above the internal os. The aim of the study is to assess the efficacy of pessary in reducing preterm birth in women with arrested preterm labor
Tocolytic agents are used for the treatment of preterm labor. It is unclear whether combination treatments of two tocolytic agents are more effective in stopping preterm labor compared to one. Therefore, the investigators propose a comparative effective trial of nifedipine plus indomethacin vs. nifedipine alone for the treatment of preterm labor
The study's primary objective is to demonstrate the superiority of retosiban to prolong pregnancy and improve neonatal outcomes compared with placebo. It is a Phase III, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter study and will be conducted in approximately 900 females, aged 12 to 45 years, with an uncomplicated, singleton pregnancy and intact membranes in preterm labor between 24^0/7 and 33^6/7 weeks of gestation. Eligible maternal subjects will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either retosiban IV infusion or placebo IV infusion over 48 hours. If not previously administered, antenatal corticosteroid treatment should be administered as either (1) two 12-mg doses of betamethasone given intramuscularly 24 hours apart or (2) four 6-mg doses of betamethasone administered intramuscularly every 12 hours. A single rescue course of antenatal corticosteroids is permitted if the antecedent treatment was at least 7 days prior to study enrolment. Investigators have discretion to use a standardized regimen of magnesium sulphate, as well as intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis for perinatal group B streptococcal infection. Prior to randomization, each subject will be stratified by progesterone treatment and gestational age. The progesterone strata will consist of subjects on established progesterone therapy or subjects not on established progesterone therapy at Screening. The study will comprise 6 phases: Screening, Inpatient Randomized Treatment, Post Infusion Assessment, Delivery, Maternal Post-Delivery Assessment, and Neonatal Medical Review. The duration of any subject's (maternal or neonatal) participation in the study will be variable and dependent on gestational ages (GA) at study entry and the date of delivery.
The primary objective of this study is to assess the efficacy of a single dose of OBE001, an oral oxytocin antagonist, given for up to 7 days to delay preterm birth by 7 days compared to placebo.
The primary objective of this study is to demonstrate the superiority of retosiban to prolong pregnancy in females with spontaneous preterm labor compared with atosiban. This objective is based on the hypothesis that prolonging the time to delivery in the absence of harm may benefit the newborn, particularly in women who experience spontaneous preterm labor at early gestational ages (GA). This study is designed to test this hypothesis through a direct comparison with atosiban, a mixed oxytocin vasopressin antagonist indicated for short-term use to delay imminent preterm birth in women between 24^0/7 and 33^6/7 weeks' gestation in preterm labor. This is a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy study, which consists of 6 phases: Screening, Inpatient Randomized Treatment, Post Infusion Assessment, Delivery, Maternal Post Delivery Assessment, and Neonatal Medical Review. Approximately 330 females will be randomly assigned to retosiban or atosiban treatment in a 1:1 ratio. The duration of any one subject's (maternal or neonatal) participation in the study will be variable and dependent on GA at study entry and the date of delivery.
The hypothesis tested is that the physical changes associated with cervical ripening result in a detectable decrease in rigidity. The main objective of this study is therefore to determine whether the measured elastographic rigidity of cervical tissues in addition to cervix size can be used to predict delivery within the next 48 hours (creation of a prognostic score).