Four-day Intensive Treatment Versus Standard Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Adults With Obsessive-compulsive Disorder

Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Clinical Trial

Official title: Four-day Intensive Treatment Versus Standard Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Adults With Obsessive-compulsive Disorder: a Single-blind, Randomized Controlled Non-inferiority Trial

Status Recruiting

Clinical Trial Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare a novel, condensed version of cognitive behavioral therapy (Bergen 4-Day Treatment, B4DT) to the gold standard psychological treatment (gold-standard CBT) for obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD). The main question it aims to answer is: • Is B4DT non-inferior to standard cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) with regard to OCD symptoms 14 weeks after treatment start? Adult patients with obsessive compulsive disorder will be randomly assigned to receive either gold standard CBT one to two times per week for 14 weeks, or 4 days of B4DT during one week.

Clinical Trial Description

Obsessive-compulsive disorder is a persistent and disabling psychiatric disorder. Individual cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) with exposure and response prevention (ERP) is an effective treatment for OCD and is recommended as a first-line intervention. However, patients need to remain in treatment for several months and even after that, around 50% remain symptomatic despite this lengthy treatment. In response to this, a novel, condensed version of CBT, B4DT, has been developed. B4DT has shown promising results in several uncontrolled trials and one randomized controlled trial with inactive control, however it has yet to be directly compared to gold-standard individual CBT. This single blind, randomized controlled trial with 120 patients (60 per arm) will compare B4DT to gold standard CBT. The primary outcome is the blind-rater administered Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS). The investigators hypothesize that B4DT will be non-inferior to gold standard CBT 14 weeks after treatment start. The non-inferiority margin is set at 4 points on the Y-BOCS. Secondary outcomes are cost effectiveness, speed of response, response and remission rates, dropout rate, and negative effects. The investigators hypothesise that participants that receive B4DT will improve faster than patients that receive standard CTB, but for the rest of the secondary outcomes, the investigators have no directed hypotheses. A more detailed preregistration, and all analysis scripts, are available at Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/w5bfp/). ;

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Disease
• Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

• NCT number: NCT05608278
• Study type: Interventional
• Source: Karolinska Institutet
• Contact: Christian Rück, PhD
• Phone: +46704843392
• Email: christian.ruck@ki.se
• Status: Recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: November 17, 2022
• Completion date: August 30, 2025