View clinical trials related to Nut Hypersensitivity.
Filter by:The number of young children with food allergy, in particular with nut allergy, is increasing worldwide. A diagnosis of nut allergy can cause much anxiety in parents. They worry about their child being exposed to nuts in foods when outside the home. This anxiety can lead to these young children being restricted from taking part in normal childhood activities. Last year, the investigators conducted a study Recording accidental allergic reactions in children's and teenagers (ReAACT) in which they surveyed over 500 children with food allergy attending our clinic, in order to learn more about their participation in social activities and their practices in relation to eating outside the home. In the present study, the investigators wish to build upon these results through using the findings to develop a programme to help to lessen the fear and anxiety experienced by parents of young children with newly diagnosed nut allergy. The investigators imagine that knowledge of how other families with children who have food allergy participate in activities involving food outside of the home might help newly diagnosed families. The investigators would like to know if parents of young children newly diagnosed with nut allergy would benefit from hearing this information. In order to do this, the investigators have developed a short online programme that parents can take part in, in their own homes. Content will focus on the day to day social activities of children with food allergy, based on the findings of the REAACT study. To help the investigators to measure the effectiveness of this programme on reducing anxiety and improving quality of life, they are asking all volunteer participants to complete 4 questionnaires. Two of these questionnaires will ask a parent to indicate 1) the impact of their child's nut allergy on their quality of life and 2) on their child's quality of life. The third questionnaire will ask about their level of anxiety. The fourth questionnaire will ask about their emotions and the coping strategies they use in the context of their child's food allergy. Participants will be randomized into 2 groups. Group 1 will take part in the online education session along with the usual education provided by the allergy team. The questionnaires will be completed online using only a study identifier number. This will ensure anonymity throughout the study. The only personal information that will be asked is parent's age group, whether they are a mother or father, their child's age and gender and whether they have any other allergies. Two weeks following the online educational session, Groups 1 and 2 will again complete the online questionnaires. The research question is to determine if the online educational session is effective at decreasing anxiety and improving quality of life in parents of young children with nut allergy. The outcomes are health related quality of life and level of anxiety. It is hoped that the findings will positively support parents, children and their families in Ireland who are living and managing nut allergy on a daily basis.
Prevalence of food allergy in the world has been inscreasing in recent years. Among nut allergy, hazelnut allergy is the most widespread in Europe and particularly in France. The current treatment for hazelnut allergy is based on eviction and wearing of an emergency kit with adrenaline auto-injector pens, to be used in the event of severe anaphylactic reaction. Oral immunotherapy (OIT) is a treatment that is now increasingly being offered as an alternatice to eviction. There are few published data concerning hazelnut OIT in Europe, where its consumption is nevertheless very high. The main objective of our study is to evaluate the clinical efficacy of the hazelnut OIT protocol, implemented since 2015 in the pneumology and allergology-paediatric department of the Mother and Child Hospital in Bron, in hazelnut allergic children under 18 years old. The secondary objectives will be to evaluate the biological efficacy and clinical tolerance of the protocol. The study is retrospective and observational, and is based on the collection of medical data from patient records.
Food allergies are constantly increasing. Peanut and nut allergies are a major cause of allergic reactions. Diagnosed patients are also at risk, because 27% of the patients that had an allergic reaction have another one in the following year with the same food, despite a real improvement in industrial products labeling. The investigators have observed in the allergy Unit that patients (and/or their family) following an elimination diet, sometimes since several years, use very strict elimination strategies. Those strategies sometimes lead to incapacities to recognize the allergens. Yet, a good identification of the allergen is the key to a successful elimination and the non-identification a known risk factor. Ferdman shown in 2006 that 27% of the patients didn't recognize the allergen there were allergic to. However, this is a US study, and geographical specificities have an impact on food consumption and culture. Food allergology needs to take those two elements into account. For example, in France, a single food can have two names. It is the case of peanut, which can be called "arachide", or more frequently "cacahuète". The goal of the study is to observe patient aptitudes to recognize peanut (and the association between the two names) and other nuts available in France and define by the European law, using a plate with various food samples in seed or in shell. Thus, patients in care at the allergy Unit of Saint Vincent Hospital of Lille (France) and their families were surveyed with a standardized procedure at the beginning of their therapeutic education and their capacity to recognize various nuts, to identify peanut ("cacahuète" or "arachide") and to associate the two words "cacahuète" and "arachide" was assessed. It is a standard procedure in therapeutic education, and the responses have been systematically entered in the medical record. The main objective of this study is to describe peanut or nut allergic patient capacity (adult, children and/or the family) to visually identify the foods there are allergic to. The secondary objective of this study is to describe the capacity of patient that describe themselves as allergic to "arachide" to associate this word to the word "cacahuète".
Peanut allergy (PA) has been well studied and its prevalence was estimated up to 1.3% in Europe. Tree nut (TN) allergy and PA are clinically similar and often coexist, TN allergy prevalence ranged from 0.05 to 4.9 %. TN allergy is longlasting and nearly all TN have been associated with fatal allergic reactions . Other legumes or TN also contain seed storage protein orthologs of the globulins (Ara h1, Ara h 3) and 2S albumins (Ara h 2) of peanut, susceptible to provoke allergic reactions, but cross-reactivity to TN and other legumes in PA patients could also appear through primarily sensitization. These possible IgE-binding cross-reactions bring to recommend the avoidance of TN and other legumes which have never been eaten in PA children. In this context, diagnosis work-up of relevant cross-allergy versus asymptomatic cross-sensitization will impact directly children's health-related quality of life (HRQL). When physicians suspect food allergy, many parameters have to be considered, such as clinical background, clinical history, type of symptoms related to the suspected food and cross-allergy to other foods. Then, to objectively confirm a food allergy and to assess its severity (related to the threshold reactive dose and symptoms), an oral food challenge (OFC) is demanded, and double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) is considered as "the gold standard". Although OFC are more and more available in the diagnosis of PA, the assessment of cross-allergy to every single allergenic TN and legumes requires full allergy work-up and often many years of follow-up. Few studies investigated cross-allergy to TN and other legume, with rates of cross-allergy to TN between 28% and 50%. However, targeting patients with severe or cross-allergic phenotypes would greatly assist the allergist in management and follow-up of PA patients (i.e., planning OFC to cross-reactive food). Our main objective is to identify different disease phenotypes of PA children with cluster analysis. This statistical approach has never been performed to identify cross-allergic phenotypes. We also will describe cross-allergy in PA and will identify possible risk factors for cross-allergy to TN and other legumes in PA children.
In Finland, the estimated prevalence of physician-diagnosed food allergy in 1-4 year old children is 9%, and the most common allergen is milk. The overall food allergy has been reported to be 3.7%. Hen's egg allergy is among the most common food allergies in childhood. In addition, it predicts later development of allergic disease such as asthma. Most of the egg and milk allergy is transient and disappears in childhood. Currently, the standard of care for food allergy includes strict allergen avoidance. However, oral immunotherapy has been under investigation in children milk, egg, and wheat allergy. Previously, induction of clinical egg tolerance has been reported with egg oral immunotherapy in children aged from 3 to 13 years. In adults, strict avoidance is still the standard care but there is also growing interest in treatment of severe food allergy with oral immunotherapy or anti-IgE. The investigators aim to analyse the results of per oral immunotherapy treatment in severe IgE-mediated egg, milk, and nut allergy in adults. Could severe egg, milk and nut allergy be treated with oral immunotherapy treatment in stead of total allergen avoidance and could desensitization thus be achieved?
The aim of this study is to identify, based on standardized food provocation tests, which nuts allergic patients need a selective, or a complete dietary eviction of all kind of nuts (nuts being defined as peanut, all tree nuts, pine nut and sesame). The investigators postulate that predictive factors of multiple nut allergy are high specific immunoglobulin E level, positive skin tests and/or clinical markers, such as atopic dermatitis, presence of other food allergies or a history of a severe previous reaction
The purpose of this study is to determine if walnut oral immunotherapy can be used in participants allergic to tree nuts to reduce tree nut allergy and induce changes in the participant's immune system.
Nut sensitization in skin prick tests is common in areas, including Finland, where birch pollen is abundant. However, sensitization to nuts in skin prick test does not predict the possibility of allergic symptoms when nuts are ingested. In this study the investigators launch and perform double-blind placebo-controlled nut challenges and oral desensitization/ protocol to those with serious symptoms in the challenge. The efficacy and safety of the new oral desensitization program is the primary outcome. The effect of oral desensitization on bronchial hyperreactivity, eosinophilic airway inflammation, and quality of life are secondary outcomes.
The goal of this study is to determine whether Trichuris suis ova, a potential immunomodulator, is safe in adults and children allergic to peanut or tree nuts.