Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Withdrawn

Administrative data

NCT number NCT01834352
Other study ID # 13-1289
Secondary ID
Status Withdrawn
Phase Phase 1/Phase 2
First received April 12, 2013
Last updated June 16, 2016
Start date November 2013
Est. completion date December 2013

Study information

Verified date March 2014
Source University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority United States: Food and Drug Administration
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if walnut oral immunotherapy can be used in subjects allergic to tree nuts to decrease their tree nut allergy and induce changes in their immune system.


Description:

Tree nut


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Withdrawn
Enrollment 0
Est. completion date December 2013
Est. primary completion date December 2013
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender Both
Age group 6 Years to 45 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Age 6 to 45 years, either sex, any race, any ethnicity with a convincing clinical history of walnut or another tree nut allergy and either a positive prick skin test (> 3mm) or serologic evidence of allergic sensitization (defined as specific IgE > 0.35 kU/L) to walnut and at least one other tree nut.

- A positive 2000 mg oral food challenge at enrollment to walnut and to one other tree nut.

- Written informed consent from participant and/or parent/guardian

- Written assent from all subjects as appropriate

- All females of child bearing age must be using appropriate birth control

Exclusion Criteria:

- History of severe anaphylaxis to walnut or other tree nuts, defined as symptoms associated with hypoxia, hypotension or neurologic compromise (cyanosis or SpO2 < 92% at any stage, hypotension, confusion, collapse, loss of consciousness; or incontinence).

- Known allergy to oat

- Chronic disease (other than asthma, atopic dermatitis, rhinitis) requiring therapy or other respiratory or medical conditions deemed by the investigator to put the subject at increased risk of anaphylaxis or poor outcomes from receiving OIT or undergoing food challenge.

- Poor control or persistent activation of atopic dermatitis

- Active eosinophilic or other inflammatory (e.g., celiac) gastrointestinal disease in the past 2 years.

- Participation in any interventional study for food allergy in the past 6 months

- Participant is on "build-up phase" of immunotherapy (i.e., has not reached maintenance dosing).

- Severe asthma (2007 NHLBI Criteria Steps 5 or 6, see Appendix 2) or poorly controlled mild or moderate asthma

- Inability to discontinue antihistamines for initial day escalation, skin testing or OFC

- Use of omalizumab or other non-traditional forms of allergen immunotherapy (e.g., oral or sublingual) or immunomodulator therapy (not including corticosteroids) or biologic therapy within the past year

- Use of beta-blockers (oral), angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARB) or calcium channel blockers

- Pregnancy or lactation

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Crossover Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor), Primary Purpose: Treatment


Intervention

Drug:
Walnut Protein Flour
Daily ingestion of gradually increasing amounts of walnut protein flour in order to induce desensitization to walnut and an unrelated tree nut.
Oat flour
Oat flour that is administered as a placebo in identical increasing doses as the active walnut flour treatment.

Locations

Country Name City State
n/a

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

References & Publications (4)

Hofmann AM, Scurlock AM, Jones SM, Palmer KP, Lokhnygina Y, Steele PH, Kamilaris J, Burks AW. Safety of a peanut oral immunotherapy protocol in children with peanut allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009 Aug;124(2):286-91, 291.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.03.045. Epub 2009 May 27. — View Citation

Jones SM, Pons L, Roberts JL, Scurlock AM, Perry TT, Kulis M, Shreffler WG, Steele P, Henry KA, Adair M, Francis JM, Durham S, Vickery BP, Zhong X, Burks AW. Clinical efficacy and immune regulation with peanut oral immunotherapy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009 Aug;124(2):292-300, 300.e1-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.05.022. Epub 2009 Jul 3. — View Citation

Kulis M, Li Y, Lane H, Pons L, Burks W. Single-tree nut immunotherapy attenuates allergic reactions in mice with hypersensitivity to multiple tree nuts. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011 Jan;127(1):81-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2010.09.014. Epub 2010 Nov 18. — View Citation

Varshney P, Jones SM, Scurlock AM, Perry TT, Kemper A, Steele P, Hiegel A, Kamilaris J, Carlisle S, Yue X, Kulis M, Pons L, Vickery B, Burks AW. A randomized controlled study of peanut oral immunotherapy: clinical desensitization and modulation of the allergic response. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011 Mar;127(3):654-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2010.12.1111. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Other Increase in walnut and test tree nut IgG4 over the course of the study. The increase in the walnut and test tree nut specific IgG4 over the course of the study as an indication of the impact of WOIT on the immune system. 36 months No
Other Decrease in the walnut and test tree nut specific IgE over the course of the study. The decrease in the walnut and test tree nut specific IgE over the course of the study as an indication of the impact of WOIT on the immune system. 36 months No
Primary Effectiveness of walnut oral immunotherapy (WOIT) on clinical desensitization to a second tree nut. The determination of the effectiveness of WOIT in inducing clinical desensitization to a second tree nut to which the subject is allergic when compared to placebo. This will be measured by the change in the amount of tree nut the subject can consume during their food challenge at 38 weeks compared to their consumption during the baseline challenge at study entry. 38 weeks Yes
Secondary Percentage of subjects who can tolerate a 5000mg oral food challenge to walnut protein following the desensitization phase of the study The percentage of subjects who can consume all of the 5000mg of walnut protein without symptoms during the food challenge after the desensitization phase of the study. 38 weeks Yes
Secondary The percentage of subjects who are able to reach a cumulative protein dose of 2000mg at the desensitization oral food challenge to walnut and the test tree nut. The percentage of subjects who are able to consume a cumulative protein dose of 2000 mg of walnut and test tree nut without symptoms during the desensitization oral food challenge. 38 weeks Yes
Secondary The percentage of subjects who demonstrate clinical tolerance at the end of the study to walnut and the test tree nut. The percentage of subjects who are able to demonstrate clinical tolerance by consuming all of the walnut and test tree nut without symptoms during the oral food challenge at the end of the study. 36 months Yes