Integrated Management of Atypical Parkinsonism: A Home-based Patient-Centered Healthcare Delivery Based on Telenursing (IMPACT Study)

Nurse-Patient Relations Clinical Trial

Official title:

Integrated Management of Atypical Parkinsonism: A Home-based Patient-Centered Healthcare Delivery Based on Telenursing. A Multicenter, Interventional Non-pharmacological, Randomized, Single-blind Clinical Trial. IMPACT Study

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT05792332
• Other study ID #: IMPACT
• Status: Recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: August 17, 2023
• Est. completion date: May 15, 2025

Study information

• Verified date: May 2023
• Source: Fondazione I.R.C.C.S. Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta
• Contact: Roberto Cilia, MD
• Phone: (+39)0223941
• Email: neuro1[@]istituto-besta.it
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This project aims to investigate whether an integrated model based on proactive and reactive telenursing monitoring coordinated by a parkinsonism nurse specialist (case manager) is able to improve care delivery and quality of life of patients with atypical parkinsonisms. This could reduce the risk (e.g. through health education counselling) and the severity of complications (e.g. falls). Main responsibilities of the Co-PI: project idea and supervision, coordination of the study, patient selection and recruitment, patient recruitment, participation in statistical analysis and drafting the manuscript. Co-PI is responsible of the rate of recruitment and drop-out

Description:

People with parkinsonism experience a wide range of motor and non-motor disorders associated with the increasing complexity of care delivery and the increased risk of complications with increased hospital access. Although a number of multidisciplinary care models have been proposed so far, results have been disappointing in terms of benefit in quality of life and cost-effectiveness. An integrated remote care model at home, involving a parkinsonism nurse specialist (PKNS) as well as a movement disorder specialist, could offer significant benefits to patients and healthcare professionals through better health education, continuity of care and more careful monitoring of the complications of the accident. In this multicenter, randomized, single-blinded, case-control trial, the investigators will recruit 164 patients with atypical parkinsonism (either MSA or PSP) to investigate the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of a 12-month remote home-based integrated program to improve healthcare delivery, coordinated by a specialized nurse (case manager) compared to standard medical care. This organizational model of personalized medicine aims to simplify, standardize and improve patient care and monitoring over time, including remote management of situations of urgency. This telenursing program consists of both proactive and reactive monitoring approaches acting synergistically to optimize the continuity of care by tertiary expert movement disorders clinics. In proactive monitoring, patients are contacted at baseline (to create a patient record focused on identifying individual-specific vulnerabilities) and then every 3 months. During the 12-month study period, patients and caregivers may contact the case manager in case of any problems (reactive monitoring), who may: (a) deal with the specific problem also by interacting with the participant's general practitioner and other healthcare professionals (e.g. physical therapist, psychologist, nutritionist, occupational therapist, social worker, etc) or (b) refer to the neurologist for teleconsultation or in-person visit according to a semi-structured algorithm, which assigns 4 levels of priority. Participants will be evaluated with clinical scales testing the quality of life, motor and non-motor symptoms, caregiver burden, adherence to therapy, cumulative disease burden and the number of unscheduled hospital access during the study period. The cost-effectiveness of this method will also be evaluated by using the EuroQoL, which will estimate the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) gain. Finally, the investigators will assess the feasibility and utility of Telemonitoring to guide decisionmaking by using a waist-worn wearable (STAT-ONTM) to monitor real-life motor autonomy and the risk of falls, including freezing of gait for 5 consecutive days every month during the 12-month duration of the study. If successful, this low-cost integrated management of patients with atypical parkinsonism may be extended to people with the more prevalent Parkinson's disease as well as other neurodegenerative disorders (e.g. Alzheimer's dementia)

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Recruiting
• Enrollment: 164
• Est. completion date: May 15, 2025
• Est. primary completion date: April 15, 2025
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 40 Years to 85 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Clinical diagnosis of MSA or PSP in all their possible variants (MSA-P, MSA-C; PSP-RS, PSP-P, PSP-CBS, etc.) according to internationally validated criteria.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Hoehn and Yahr stage = 5 in ON phase

• Clinical Frialty Scale (CFS) = 8

• Serious medical disorders that, in the opinion of the recruiting neurologist, may impair participation in the study

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Atypical Parkinsonism
• MSA - Multiple System Atrophy
• Multiple System Atrophy
• Nurse Physician Relations
• Nurse-Patient Relations
• Parkinsonian Disorders
• PSP
• Shy-Drager Syndrome

Intervention

Other:
• Telemonitoring
Patients are followed up by a nurse specialist in parkinsonism who interacts with the treating neurologist and a multidisciplinary team
• Standard-of-care
Patients are managed only by the neurologist according the institution's clinical practice

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Italy	Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Gaetano Martino	Messina
Italy	Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta	Milan
Italy	Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Nazionale Casmiro Mondino	Pavia
Italy	IRCCS Neuromed	Pozzilli

Sponsors (4)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Fondazione I.R.C.C.S. Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta	Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Gaetano Martino, Messina, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Nazionale Casmiro Mondino, Neuromed IRCCS

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Italy, 

References & Publications (15)

Borzi L, Mazzetta I, Zampogna A, Suppa A, Irrera F, Olmo G. Predicting Axial Impairment in Parkinson's Disease through a Single Inertial Sensor. Sensors (Basel). 2022 Jan 6;22(2):412. doi: 10.3390/s22020412. — View Citation

Cilia R, Mancini F, Bloem BR, Eleopra R. Telemedicine for parkinsonism: A two-step model based on the COVID-19 experience in Milan, Italy. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2020 Jun;75:130-132. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2020.05.038. Epub 2020 Jun 10. — View Citation

Fabbrini G, Abbruzzese G, Barone P, Antonini A, Tinazzi M, Castegnaro G, Rizzoli S, Morisky DE, Lessi P, Ceravolo R; REASON study group. Adherence to anti-Parkinson drug therapy in the "REASON" sample of Italian patients with Parkinson's disease: the linguistic validation of the Italian version of the "Morisky Medical Adherence Scale-8 items". Neurol Sci. 2013 Nov;34(11):2015-22. doi: 10.1007/s10072-013-1438-1. Epub 2013 Jun 1. — View Citation

Gerlach OH, Broen MP, van Domburg PH, Vermeij AJ, Weber WE. Deterioration of Parkinson's disease during hospitalization: survey of 684 patients. BMC Neurol. 2012 Mar 8;12:13. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-12-13. — View Citation

Hagell P, Alvariza A, Westergren A, Arestedt K. Assessment of Burden Among Family Caregivers of People With Parkinson's Disease Using the Zarit Burden Interview. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017 Feb;53(2):272-278. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.09.007. Epub 2016 Nov 1. — View Citation

Hassan A, Wu SS, Schmidt P, Dai Y, Simuni T, Giladi N, Bloem BR, Malaty IA, Okun MS; NPF-QII Investigators. High rates and the risk factors for emergency room visits and hospitalization in Parkinson's disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2013 Nov;19(11):949-54. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2013.06.006. Epub 2013 Jul 5. — View Citation

Huse DM, Schulman K, Orsini L, Castelli-Haley J, Kennedy S, Lenhart G. Burden of illness in Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord. 2005 Nov;20(11):1449-54. doi: 10.1002/mds.20609. — View Citation

Jenkinson C, Fitzpatrick R, Peto V, Greenhall R, Hyman N. The Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39): development and validation of a Parkinson's disease summary index score. Age Ageing. 1997 Sep;26(5):353-7. doi: 10.1093/ageing/26.5.353. — View Citation

Lennaerts H, Groot M, Rood B, Gilissen K, Tulp H, van Wensen E, Munneke M, van Laar T, Bloem BR. A Guideline for Parkinson's Disease Nurse Specialists, with Recommendations for Clinical Practice. J Parkinsons Dis. 2017;7(4):749-754. doi: 10.3233/JPD-17119 — View Citation

Miller MD, Paradis CF, Houck PR, Mazumdar S, Stack JA, Rifai AH, Mulsant B, Reynolds CF 3rd. Rating chronic medical illness burden in geropsychiatric practice and research: application of the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale. Psychiatry Res. 1992 Mar;41(3):237-48. doi: 10.1016/0165-1781(92)90005-n. — View Citation

Muzerengi S, Herd C, Rick C, Clarke CE. A systematic review of interventions to reduce hospitalisation in Parkinson's disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2016 Mar;24:3-7. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2016.01.011. Epub 2016 Jan 13. — View Citation

Rockwood K, Song X, MacKnight C, Bergman H, Hogan DB, McDowell I, Mitnitski A. A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people. CMAJ. 2005 Aug 30;173(5):489-95. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.050051. — View Citation

Schrag A, Selai C, Jahanshahi M, Quinn NP. The EQ-5D--a generic quality of life measure-is a useful instrument to measure quality of life in patients with Parkinson's disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2000 Jul;69(1):67-73. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.69.1.67. — View Citation

van der Marck MA, Bloem BR, Borm GF, Overeem S, Munneke M, Guttman M. Effectiveness of multidisciplinary care for Parkinson's disease: a randomized, controlled trial. Mov Disord. 2013 May;28(5):605-11. doi: 10.1002/mds.25194. Epub 2012 Nov 19. — View Citation

Wenning GK, Stankovic I, Vignatelli L, Fanciulli A, Calandra-Buonaura G, Seppi K, Palma JA, Meissner WG, Krismer F, Berg D, Cortelli P, Freeman R, Halliday G, Hoglinger G, Lang A, Ling H, Litvan I, Low P, Miki Y, Panicker J, Pellecchia MT, Quinn N, Sakakibara R, Stamelou M, Tolosa E, Tsuji S, Warner T, Poewe W, Kaufmann H. The Movement Disorder Society Criteria for the Diagnosis of Multiple System Atrophy. Mov Disord. 2022 Jun;37(6):1131-1148. doi: 10.1002/mds.29005. Epub 2022 Apr 21. — View Citation

* Note: There are 15 references in all — Click here to view all references

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Changes in total score of the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire 39-items scale (PDQ-39)	Thi is a 39-items questionnaire assessing the quality of life of patient with Parkinsonism. Score is expressed in percentage from 0% to 100%. The higher the score the lower the quality of life	baseline, week 52
Secondary	Changes in the Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part II (MDS-UPDRS Part II)	This is a scale (MDS-UPDRS Part II) used to assess activities of daily living. Score ranges from 0 to 52. The higher the score the worse the Disability	baseline, week 52
Secondary	Changes in the Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part IV (MDS-UPDRS part IV)	This is a scale (MDS-UPDRS part IV) used to assess complications of dopaminergic therapy. Score ranges from 0 to 24. The higher the score the worse the disability	baseline, week 52
Secondary	Changes in the Non-Motor Symptoms Scale score (NMSS)	This is a scale used to assess the burden of non-motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease. Total score is 0-360. The higher the score the worse the disability	baseline, week 52
Secondary	Changes in Unified Multiple System Atrophy Rating Scale (UMSARS)	This scale (UMSARS) is used to assess disease progression in multiple system atrophy.The score is from 0 up to 109. The higher the score the worse the disability	baseline, week 52
Secondary	Changes in Progressive Supranuclear Palsy Rating Scale (PSPRS)	This scale (PSPRS) is used to assess disease progression in Progressive Supranuclear Palsy. The total score is 0-100. The higher the score the worse the disability	baseline, week 52
Secondary	Changes in the activities of daily living questionnaire (ADL_questionnaire)	The "ADL (Activities of Daily Living)" evaluation refers to the fundamental activities of daily life in which the subject is dependent: on a scale from 0 to 6 points, the lower the score, the greater the person's need for assistance	baseline, week 52
Secondary	Changes in the intrumental activities of daily living questionnaire (IADL)	The "IADL (Instrumental Activities of Daily Living)" evaluation refers to the instrumental activities of daily life in which the subject is dependent (eg using telephone, preparing meals, taking medications, etc): on a scale from 0 to 8 points, the lower the score, the greater the person's need for assistance	baseline, week 52
Secondary	Changes in the Zarit Burden Interview scale score (ZBI)	This is a scale used to investigate caregiver's burnout. Total score is 0-40. The higher the score the worse the disability	baseline, week 52
Secondary	Number of unplanned hospital admission	Sum of number of outpatients departments assessments, number of emergency rooms accesses, number of unplanned hospitalizations	week 52
Secondary	Number of incident comorbidities	The number of incident comorbidities over the 12.month study period will be assessed using a semistructured interview	baseline, week 52
Secondary	Changes in Euro Quality Of Life Dimensions-5 Levels score (EuroQOL-5)	This is a useful and validated instrument to measure quality of life in patients with Parkinson's disease. The patient select a score from 0 to 100. The lowest the score the lowest quality of life.	baseline, week 52
Secondary	Changes in the Morisky Medical Adherence scale-8 items score (MMAS)	This is an 8-items scale used to investigate patient adherence to the therapy prescribed by the MD specialist. Score is 0-8 "yes" answer. The 3 categorical Likert Scale is: low adherence <6; medium adherence 6-8; high adherence 8.	baseline, week 26, week 52
Secondary	Changes in patient experience questionnaire (EQ)	This is a questionnaire assessing patient perception and satisfaction of the quality of health care. Total score is 0-100. The highest the score, the worst the satisfaction	baseline, week 26, week 52
Secondary	Changes in freezing of walking, Freezing of gait-questionnaire (FOG-Q)	Changes in gait performances, mainly in freezing of walking, are analysis by this questionnaire. Total score is 0-24. The highest the score, the highest the freezing	baseline, week 52