Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT01289418
Other study ID # pcirn-surveillancehcw-0910
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received February 2, 2011
Last updated August 15, 2012
Start date October 2009
Est. completion date May 2010

Study information

Verified date August 2012
Source PHAC/CIHR Influenza Research Network
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority Canada: Canadian Institutes of Health ResearchCanada: Ethics Review CommitteeCanada: Health Canada
Study type Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

Influenza vaccines are continuously modified to adjust to the virus antigenic shifts or drifts, and its safety profile may vary. While generally considered safe, influenza vaccines have been associated in the past with increases in cases of Guillain-Barré syndrome (1976) or with oculorespiratory syndrome (2001). The emergence of a novel strain of H1N1 influenza virus (pH1N1) has prompted health departments worldwide to prepare for mass vaccination campaigns with a new H1N1 pandemic vaccine. Following recommendations of the World Health Organization (WHO), Canada immunized its population with a dose-sparing adjuvanted vaccine. While the adjuvant developed by GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) has been administered to over 39 000 people, only a few hundred will have been vaccinated with the H1N1 formulation in clinical trials before the mass campaign was launched. With this small number, adverse events occurring at a rate < 1% will not be detected by these clinical trials.

Considering that most cases of pH1N1 to date have been relatively mild, it will be imperative to rapidly detect adverse events serious enough to reconsider the use of the vaccine. Passive surveillance is collecting notifications of adverse events but the sensitivity of this system is not high and its timeliness is not necessarily optimal.

In Canada, healthcare workers (HCW) are among those who were offered the new pandemic vaccine in priority. Because they were offered the vaccine early in the campaign and because they constitute a well-defined group in good general health, this group of people may be well suited for monitoring the safety of the pH1N1 vaccine.

The main objective of this project was to estimate in HCW vaccinated against pH1N1 the frequency of adverse events of sufficient severity to cause work absenteeism or medical consultation.

The active surveillance was done in HCW from 3 sites (Canadian hospitals) participating in the Pandemic Influenza Research Network (PCIRN): (1) Halifax (Nova Scotia), (2) Quebec City (Quebec): 3 hospitals, (3) Toronto


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 6525
Est. completion date May 2010
Est. primary completion date May 2010
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender Both
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- To be a health care worker from one of the three Canadian Hospitals participating in the Public Health Agency of Canada/Canadian Institutes for Health Research- Influenza Research Network (PCIRN): Quebec City, Toronto, and Halifax.

- To have been immunized with the pH1N1 vaccine.

- To have an email address.

- To be 18 years old and older.

Exclusion Criteria:

Study Design

Observational Model: Cohort, Time Perspective: Prospective


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Locations

Country Name City State
n/a

Sponsors (11)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
PHAC/CIHR Influenza Research Network Alberta Children's Hospital, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec, CHU de Québec, GlaxoSmithKline, Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation, Institut National en Santé Publique du Québec, Laval University, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre, The Ottawa Hospital, Vancouver General Hospital

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Number of Participants Who Had Experienced a New Health Problem or the Worsening of an Existing Health Condition That Resulted in a Medical Consultation. at day 8, 15 and 29 Yes
Primary Number of Participants Who Had Experienced a New Health Problem or the Worsening of an Existing Health Condition That Resulted in Work Absenteeism. day 8, 15 and 29 Yes
Primary the Occurrence of Serious Adverse Events (SAE) 6 months Yes