View clinical trials related to Non-specific Chronic Neck Pain.
Filter by:This research focuses on adding diaphragmatic breathing to conventional physiotherapy sessions, particularly for patients suffering from chronic neck pain aged between 20-40 years in Jordan. Chronic neck pain is recognized as one of the most prevalent musculoskeletal pain disorders, significantly impacting physical, social, and psychological aspects of life. This issue leads to a decline in functional performance and work productivity, negatively affecting both individual and societal levels. Several factors, such as poor posture and prolonged use of smartphones, contribute to the exacerbation of non-specific chronic neck pain. These problems also affect respiratory muscles, particularly the diaphragm responsible for primary respiration, resulting in a shift from abdominal to chest breathing. This alteration increases the use of neck muscles, subsequently intensifying neck pain and negatively impacting sleep quality in these individuals. The primary objective of this therapeutic study is to investigate the role of adding diaphragmatic breathing to physiotherapy sessions in alleviating pain and improving sleep quality. RCT study will investigate the effect of adding the diaphragmatic breathing to conventional physiotherapy treatment on pain and sleep quality over one month.
Chronic nonspecific neck pain is a common musculoskeletal disorder recognized for its high rates of disability and economic losses, ranking second in musculoskeletal conditions after low back pain. There are several effective physical therapy interventions to treat chronic nonspecific neck pain, such as laser therapy. High-intensity laser therapy (HILT) is a recent treatment proposed to reduce musculoskeletal pain; however, there are few studies that prove its effects in reducing neck pain. The aim of this randomized clinical trial is to evaluate the effect of high-intensity laser therapy on pain intensity in patients with chronic nonspecific neck pain. The research will be carried out in the laboratory of physical agents at the Andrés Bello University, Campus Casona de las Condes. Participants will be employers and volunteer students with non-specific chronic neck pain. Participants will be randomized and allocated into 2 study groups: group 1 (HILT and stretching exercises) and group 2 (simulated HILT and stretching exercises). Treatments will be performed twice a week for 4 weeks with 3 assessments: before treatment, at the end of treatment, and 12 weeks after treatment (follow-up). The main results will be the differences in pain pressure threshold (ΔPPT), intensity of pain at rest (ΔRPI) and intensity of pain on movement (ΔMPI). Secondary outcome measures, on the other hand, will include differences in cervical spine range (ΔCROM) and cervical disability (ΔND).
Non-specific chronic neck pain (NCNP) is commonly seen in office workers. Individuals with NCNP not only demonstrate impaired neck movement control and muscle activation, but also show abnormal scapular kinematics and muscle activation timing. Office workers with NCNP also show higher activity of upper trapezius during computer typing and have difficulty relaxing upper trapezius after typing. These changes related to scapula may increase strain over neck. In addition to the altered neuromuscular control, recent studies found neuroplasticity changes in the central nervous system on patients of chronic musculoskeletal disorders. Therefore, few studies found shifts and alterations of motor cortex representation of neck muscles in individuals with NCNP, which was correlated with delayed muscle activation of deep neck flexors muscle in functional activities. However, no studies have explored that whether this corticospinal adaptation also happens over scapular muscles, especially after a computer typing task. The objectives of this proposal are to investigate the differences in corticospinal and neuromuscular control of shoulder complex between office workers with and without NCNP. Thirty-five individuals with NCNP and 35 healthy controls will be recruited. Twenty young healthy subjects will be also recruited for a pilot study to test the reliability of all the measures. Scapular kinematics and muscle activation will be tested during arm elevation. Corticospinal parameters of trapezius and serratus anterior will be tested with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), including active motor threshold, motor evoked potential, cortical silent period, short interval intracortical facilitation, short interval intracortical inhibition and cortical mapping. Corticospinal parameters, except cortical mapping, will be measured again after a 30-minute computer typing task. Scapular muscle activation will be also recorded during the typing task.
Introduction: Non-specific chronic neck pain is a very prevalent condition in the population ranging from 45% to 54%. Several conservative treatments have been shown to be effective and are currently used in clinical practice. However, among the physical therapy ones, no study evaluated the effectiveness of Pompage techniques in addition to an active treatment. This protocol describes a controlled, randomized trial that aims to assess the effectiveness of two physical therapy treatments in patients with chronic non-specific neck pain. Methods: Seventy subjects with chronic nonspecific neck pain from 18 to 80 years will be recruited according to the inclusion criteria. Afterwards they will be randomized to one of the 2 groups: group 1 (G1) will undergo an active intervention and group 2 (G2) will receive the same active intervention plus manual technique. Active intervention, according to the current guidelines on non-specific neck pain, will be a treatment including both pain education and home exercises; manual technique will be the so-called "Pompage" technique. A booster session will be planned for both groups after 4 weeks from the beginning of the trial, to reinforce the patients adherence to the self-treatment. The patients will be evaluated before the treatments (baseline, T0), after 8 weeks from the beginning of the treatments (T1), and 6 months after the end of the treatments (T2). The primary outcome will be pain perception, which will be assessed using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The secondary outcomes will be: kinesiophobia (measured with the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia - TSK), physical function (measured with the Neck Disability Index - NDI), active cervical range of motion - ROM (measured with the "CROM Deluxe" device), patient satisfaction for treatment (measured with the Physical Therapy Satisfaction Questionnaire - PTPSQI(15)), and subjective perception of improvement (measured with the Global Perceived Effect - GPE). Adverse effects will be registered. Discussion: Considering that there is no consensus on the use of Pompage techniques in addition to an active treatment in individuals with nonspecific chronic neck pain, our protocol will be the basis for the use of these techniques by health professionals and for new studies to be performed.