Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT05247723 |
Other study ID # |
SIVCA |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Completed |
Phase |
N/A
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
January 1, 2019 |
Est. completion date |
January 20, 2022 |
Study information
Verified date |
March 2022 |
Source |
Cairo University |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
Study question:
Can enough testicular tissue be aspirated for sperm retrieval in non-obstructive azoospermia
(NOA), using a wide bore 14-G Standard IV cannula in comparison to micro-TESE?
Summary answer:
Standard IV cannula Aspiration (SIVCA) can yield an ample amount of testicular tissue
sufficient for sperm retrieval through a single puncture site on the scrotum.
Description:
What is known already:
The current conventional method of testicular sperm aspiration is fine needle aspiration
(FNA). FNA has the advantage of being a cost-effective and minimally invasive procedure
compared to open testicular sperm extraction (TESE). But FNA with its conventional 23-G
needle may not always yield enough testicular tissue for sperm retrieval. Furthermore, FNA
may require multiple punctures on the scrotum to retrieve enough tissues from different areas
of the testis.
Study design, size, duration:
A 24 months prospective cohort study conducted at a specialized IVF center. A total of 130
men aged from 22 to 53 years old (35.03 +/- 9.04) with NOA and normal testicular volume (≥
12ml) were enrolled in the study. The men had testicular biopsies taken at the day of their
partners' ovum pick-up. On each patient, the testes were randomized to undergo SIVCA on one
testis followed by micro-TESE on the contralateral testis.
Participants/materials, setting, methods:
After local anesthesia, a wide bore 14-G standard IV cannula was introduced near the lower
pole of the testis. The needle was withdrawn and the catheter introduced into the testicular
tissue. A 20-ml syringe was secured to the catheter and constant negative pressure applied
and secured with a clamp. Back and forth motions were performed covering as many areas of the
testis as possible. Micro-TESE was then performed on the contralateral testis.Sperm retrieval
rates (SRR) will be compared between the two techniques using McNemar χ2 test. A P-value of
less than 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.