View clinical trials related to Non-nutritive Sucking.
Filter by:The design of this study is an experimental research design, and the research subjects who meet the conditions of acceptance will be used as randomized controlled trials. Cases meeting the sampling conditions in the neonatal intensive care unit were stratified according to birth weeks (26 to 27+6 weeks and 28 to 31+6 weeks), and then randomly assigned to experimental group A (non-nutritive sucking 5 minutes), experimental group B (non-nutritive sucking for 15 minutes) and control group (no non-nutritive sucking). The variables controlled in this study were gestational weeks, birth weight, sex, Apgar score, respirator use, and type of milk fed. The premature infants in the experimental group were given non-nutritive sucking before the first tube-feeding and the feeding volume reached 10mL/kg/day, while the control group was not given non-nutritive sucking before tube-feeding. The interventional measures adopted in this study were set as two meals a day before 17:00, and the patients were force-fed every three hours, and the time interval between the two interventional measures was every six hours (intervention measures were provided every other meal) , the measurement time, times and intervals of the two groups are the same. Experimental group A was given pacifier NNS 5 minutes before each feeding, experimental group B was given pacifier NNS 15 minutes before each feeding, while the control group was not given NNS before feeding, and the two groups were given 150 minutes after feeding (ie 30 minutes before the next force-feeding) to monitor gastric residual volume, changes in abdominal circumference, and vomiting. Since FI mainly occurred 48-72 hours after the start of feeding, the duration of this study was 3 consecutive days to compare with the control group. The acceptance conditions of the research objects are: 1. Premature infants whose gestational age is more than 26 weeks (inclusive) to less than 32 weeks, 2. Premature neonates who have been placed with orogastric tube or nasogastric tube for force-feeding, 3. No congenital gastrointestinal tract Abnormal, 4. No serious congenital abnormalities and heart disease, no cleft lip and palate, 5. Never received stomach or intestinal surgery, 6. No central nervous system damage, 7. With the consent of their parents or guardians, and fill out the consent form By. If the condition is unstable during the course of the case, including severe hypoxemia, hypotension, esophageal perforation, necrotic enteritis, sepsis caused by infection, and grade 3-4 intraventricular hemorrhage, etc., they will be excluded.
This study will determine if it is beneficial to use a weighted pacifier in neonates.
No one disputes that fetal sucking in the womb is a natural human right. Available information on whether, how and when to stop children's sucking habits comes from popular cultural misunderstandings and lack of sound evidence-based results. Because Western countries regard thumb or pacifier (dummy) sucking after a given age as a shameful habit, parents feel stressed, anxious and even guilty for being unable to induce their children to stop non-nutritive sucking (NNS) habits or drag their unwilling child off the soothing-devices, such as pacifiers. Pacifier sucking substantially decreases the incidence of sudden infant death syndrome, reduces pain and crying, and prolongs sleeping time. Of major interest is the hypothesis that NNS improves proprioceptive and exteroceptive development including gait in big mammals (rhesus monkeys). Despite these benefits, available information claims the possible risks induced by prolonging NNS, including psychological shortfall, delayed language skills or dental problems. Despite these claims, authoritative clinical organizations worldwide reach no consensus on the appropriate age at which NNS habits should be stopped. Prompted by conflicting information from primary studies and reviews designed to balance the benefits and risks of NNS habits, our aim in this pilot open randomized controlled trial (RCT) is to test the efficacy of NNS in improving balance and gait in children enrolled at 12-42 months and followed for three years.
Preterm infants undergo very frequent painful procedures during neonatal care particularly during the first few days. The support for the pain of the preterm is a priority for nurses and neonatologists. Previous studies showed that non-nutritive sucking combined with sucrose ensures effective pain-relief for preterm (28-32 weeks GA). Unfortunately, the use of sucrose is limited to 4 administrations per day which is insufficient compared to the average of daily painful procedures. So, validation of an effective non-pharmacological intervention to relieve or avoid pain is essential. Facilitated tucking alone has been validated for preterm less than 37 GA during heel stick procedure with the PIPP score but no study looks for the benefit for pain relief of the association of non-nutritive sucking and facilitated tucking during heel stick procedure.