Outcome
Type |
Measure |
Description |
Time frame |
Safety issue |
Primary |
Change in subjective cognitive difficulties : Perceived cognitive impairments |
The impact of self-hypnosis/self-care on the perceived cognitive impairments will be assessed by means of the subtest "Perceived cognitive impairments" of the Functionnal Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive Function (FACT-COG; Wagner et al., 2009). Scale ranging from 0 to 4 (0=never; 4=several times a day). |
T1 (before the intervention), T2 (right after the intervention), T3 (3 months follow-up) |
|
Primary |
Change in subjective cognitive difficulties : Comments by others |
The impact of self-hypnosis/self-care on the perceived cognitive impairments will be assessed by means of the subtest "Comments by others" of the Functionnal Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive Function (FACT-COG; Wagner et al., 2009). Scale ranging from 0 to 4 (0=never; 4=several times a day). |
T1 (before the intervention), T2 (right after the intervention), T3 (3 months follow-up) |
|
Primary |
Change in subjective cognitive difficulties : Perceived cognitive abilities |
The impact of self-hypnosis/self-care on the perceived cognitive impairments will be assessed by means of the subtest "Perceived cognitive abilities" of the Functionnal Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive Function (FACT-COG; Wagner et al., 2009). Scale ranging from 0 to 4 (0=not at all; 4=very much). |
T1 (before the intervention), T2 (right after the intervention), T3 (3 months follow-up) |
|
Primary |
Change in subjective cognitive difficulties : Impact on quality of life |
The impact of self-hypnosis/self-care on the perceived cognitive impairments will be assessed by means of the subtest "Impact on quality of life" of the Functionnal Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive Function (FACT-COG; Wagner et al., 2009). Scale ranging from 0 to 4 (0=not at all; 4=very much). |
T1 (before the intervention), T2 (right after the intervention), T3 (3 months follow-up) |
|
Primary |
Change in objective cognitive difficulties : Verbal long term memory |
The impact of self-hypnosis/self-care on verbal long term memory will be assessed by means the Buschke Selective Reminding Test (Buschke, 1973). According to the sex and the subject's age, the test gives us a score and the norms. |
T1 (before the intervention), T2 (right after the intervention), T3 (3 months follow-up) |
|
Primary |
Change in objective cognitive difficulties : Attention |
The impact of self-hypnosis/self-care on attention abilities will be assessed by means of the subtest "Phasic alertness" of the Test of Attentional Performance 2.3.1 (Zimmermann & Fimm, 2002). Computerized test, according to the sex and the subject's age, the test gives us a score and the norms. |
T1 (before the intervention), T2 (right after the intervention), T3 (3 months follow-up) |
|
Primary |
Change in objective cognitive difficulties : Processing speed |
The impact of self-hypnosis/self-care on processing speed abilities will be assessed by means of the first part of the Stroop test (Stroop, 1935). According to the sex and the subject's age, the test gives us a score and the norms. |
T1 (before the intervention), T2 (right after the intervention), T3 (3 months follow-up) |
|
Primary |
Change in objective cognitvie difficulties : Inhibition |
The impact of self-hypnosis/self-care on inhibition abilities will be assessed by means of the first part of the Stroop test (Stroop, 1935). According to the sex and the subject's age, the test gives us a score and the norms. |
T1 (before the intervention), T2 (right after the intervention), T3 (3 months follow-up) |
|
Primary |
Change in objective cognitvie difficulties : mental flexibility |
The impact of self-hypnosis/self-care on mental flexibility abilities will be assessed by means of the subtest "Flexibility" of the Test of Attentional Performance 2.3.1 (Zimmermann & Fimm, 2002). Computerized test, according to the sex and the subject's age, the test gives us a score and the norms. |
T1 (before the intervention), T2 (right after the intervention), T3 (3 months follow-up) |
|
Primary |
Change in objective cognitvie difficulties : working memory |
The impact of self-hypnosis/self-care on mental flexibility abilities will be assessed by means of the subtest "Working memory" of the Test of Attentional Performance 2.3.1 (Zimmermann & Fimm, 2002). Computerized test, according to the sex and the subject's age, the test gives us a score and the norms. |
T1 (before the intervention), T2 (right after the intervention), T3 (3 months follow-up) |
|
Primary |
Change in objective cognitvie difficulties : executive functions |
The impact of self-hypnosis/self-care on executive functions will be assessed by means of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (David et al., 1948). According to the sex and the subject's age, the test gives us a score and the norms. |
T1 (before the intervention), T2 (right after the intervention), T3 (3 months follow-up) |
|
Primary |
Impact on return-to-work |
For people who continued to work at time of recruitment, Work Design questionnaire will be administered Morgeson & Hymphrey, 2006). Scale raging from 0 to 5 (0=not at all; 5=exactly). |
T1 (before the intervention), T2 (right after the intervention), T3 (3 months follow-up) |
|
Secondary |
Change in emtional distress : Anxiety |
The impact of self-hypnosis/self-care on anxiety and despression will be assessed by means of the Hopsital Anxiety and Depression Scale (Zigmond & Snaith, 1983). Scale ranging from 0 to 3 (0=never; 4=always). |
T1 (before the intervention), T2 (right after the intervention), T3 (3 months follow-up) |
|
Secondary |
Change in emtional distress : Depression |
The impact of self-hypnosis/self-care on anxiety and despression will be assessed by means of the Hopsital Anxiety and Depression Scale (Zigmond & Snaith, 1983). Scale ranging from 0 to 3 (0=alwaysr; 4=never). |
T1 (before the intervention), T2 (right after the intervention), T3 (3 months follow-up) |
|
Secondary |
Change in fatigue : General fatigue |
The impact of self-hypnosis/self-care on fatigue will be assessed by means of the subscale "general fatigue" of the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (Smets et al., 1995). Scale ranging from 1 to 4 (1=not agree at all; 4=agree completely). |
T1 (before the intervention), T2 (right after the intervention), T3 (3 months follow-up) |
|
Secondary |
Change in fatigue : Physical fatigue |
The impact of self-hypnosis/self-care on fatigue will be assessed by means of the subscale "physical fatigue" of the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (Smets et al., 1995). Scale ranging from 1 to 4 (1=not agree at all; 4=agree completely). |
T1 (before the intervention), T2 (right after the intervention), T3 (3 months follow-up) |
|
Secondary |
Change in fatigue : Mental fatigue |
The impact of self-hypnosis/self-care on fatigue will be assessed by means of the subscale "mental fatigue" of the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (Smets et al., 1995). Scale ranging from 1 to 4 (1=not agree at all; 4=agree completely). |
T1 (before the intervention), T2 (right after the intervention), T3 (3 months follow-up) |
|
Secondary |
Change in fatigue : Motivational decrease |
The impact of self-hypnosis/self-care on fatigue will be assessed by means of the subscale "motivational decrease" of the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (Smets et al., 1995). Scale ranging from 1 to 4 (1=not agree at all; 4=agree completely). |
T1 (before the intervention), T2 (right after the intervention), T3 (3 months follow-up) |
|
Secondary |
Change in fatigue |
The impact of self-hypnosis/self-care on fatigue will be assessed by means of the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI; Smets et al., 1995) and an 1-week agenda. |
T1 (before the intervention), T2 (right after the intervention), T3 (3 months follow-up) |
|
Secondary |
Change in fatigue : Weekly agenda |
Qualitative questionnaire concerning the sleep habits of participants. They have to give information concerning their sleeping habits. |
T1 (before the intervention), T2 (right after the intervention), T3 (3 months follow-up) |
|
Secondary |
Change in quality of life |
The improvement of quality of life will be assessed my means of the european Organization for Reasearch and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 version 3.0 (E Aaronson et al., 1993). Scale ranging from 1 to 4 (1=not at all; 4=excellent). |
T1 (before the intervention), T2 (right after the intervention), T3 (3 months follow-up) |
|