Non-Eosinophilic Asthma Clinical Trial
Official title:
Should Non-Eosinophilic Asthmatic Subjects be Treated With Inhaled Corticosteroids?
The efficacy of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in asthmatic subjects showing no sputum
eosinophils is controversial. The broad aim of this study is to assess whether ICS alone or
in combination with long-acting beta-2 agonists are an effective treatment in
non-eosinophilic asthmatic subjects. Methods: The investigators will perform a randomized
double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study comparing the efficacy of ICS and
placebo for 4 weeks followed by a 4-week open treatment period with ICS/salmeterol in
steroid-naïve asthmatic subjects without sputum eosinophilia. The primary outcome will be
the the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) score after four weeks of treatment by ICS or
placebo.
This study will determine whether or not non-eosinophilic asthmatic subjects respond to ICS
and if they further benefit from the addition of a long-acting beta-2 agonists. This study
will also determine whether or not the assessment of airway inflammation should be performed
in every asthmatic patient in order to give the most appropriate treatment.
| Status | Recruiting |
| Enrollment | 100 |
| Est. completion date | September 2010 |
| Est. primary completion date | January 2010 |
| Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
| Gender | Both |
| Age group | 18 Years to 70 Years |
| Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Are between 18 and 70 years of age at the time of signing the informed consent. - Have a diagnosis of asthma according to the Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma and have not been treated with ICS in the previous two months. - Have a PC20 methacholine less than 8 mg/ml. - Have a baseline FEV1 greater or equal to 65% of predicted value (at least 6 hours after bronchodilator). - Are not optimally controlled with short-acting 2 agonists as shown by awakenings due to asthmatic symptoms at least once a week, or regular use of salbutamol on 4 or more occasions per week (excluding exercise prophylaxis) due to asthma symptoms. - ACQ score equal or greater than 2 - Have sputum eosinophils less than 2% - Are non smokers or ex-smokers who smoked a maximum of 10 pack/year. Exclusion Criteria: - Hospitalized patients within the last 3 months - Current or recent (within the last month) symptoms of a cold or flu - Patients with a history of near fatal asthma - Subjects on inhaled corticosteroids, prednisone, long-acting beta 2 agonists, montelukast or theophylline, within 2 months prior to entry into the study. |
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor), Primary Purpose: Treatment
| Country | Name | City | State |
|---|---|---|---|
| Canada | Firestone Institute for Respiratory Health | Hamilton | Ontario |
| Canada | The Meakins-Christie Laboratories | Montreal | Quebec |
| Canada | Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal | Montréal | Quebec |
| Canada | The Ottawa Hospital | Ottawa | Ontario |
| Canada | Hôpital Laval | Quebec | |
| Canada | Vancouver General Hospital | Vancouver | British Columbia |
| Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
|---|---|
| Université de Montréal | Laval University, McGill University, University of British Columbia, University of Ottawa |
Canada,
| Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) score after 4 weeks of treatment with ICS or placebo | two years | No | |
| Secondary | Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) score after 4 weeks of treatment | Two years | No | |
| Secondary | Change in FEV1 | Two years | No | |
| Secondary | Change in PC20 | Two years | No |
| Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Completed |
NCT05288504 -
A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of AVTX-002 for the Treatment of Poorly Controlled Non-Eosinophilic Asthma.
|
Phase 2 |