View clinical trials related to Non-carious Cervical Lesions.
Filter by:The objective of this study is to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of a new composite resin (SHOFU Beautifil II LS) vs a control (3M/ESPE Filtek Supreme) for use in restoring non carious cervical lesions Class V lesions. 3M ESPE FiltekTM Supreme is one of the composite resin materials that will be used in this study (Group 1). This is a light-activated, flowable restorative composite. Shofu Beautifil II LS (SI R21204) is a new type of filling material called a Giomer. This is the second composite that will be used in this study (Group 2) Giomer is a collective term for dental materials that will release ions, such as fluoride. Results from previous studies show that the released ions may have beneficial effects on the tooth, including strengthening the tooth. In each participant, one tooth with a class V lesion will be randomized to group 1, and a second tooth with a class V lesion will be randomized to group 2. The restorations will be observed over 18 months to determine clinical acceptability.
This study will verify the effect of the application of a substance (10% sodium hypoclorite -NaOCL) in dentin on noncarious cervical lesions, with the aim of increasing the longevity of the restorations performed in this type of lesion. The hypothesis of the present study is that the application of deproteinization solution after acid etching does not influence the failure rate of the restorations.
This study aims to evaluate the effect of chlorhexidine digluconate (CRX) application in etched dentin on the retention of noncarious cervical lesions restorations. A randomized controlled split-mouth and blind trial will be carried out. Patients with at least two non-carious cervical lesions (NCL) will be selected. NCL will be randomly assigned according the type of teeth (incisors, canine or pre-molars) into two groups: control or experimental group (application of 2% CRX for 60 seconds after the acid etching procedure). Class V restorations will be performed out with an etch-and-rinse adhesive system (Adper Single Bond 2-3M ESPE) and a composite resin (Filtek Z350-3M ESPE) according the manufacture instructions, by previously trained operators. The restorations will be evaluated by a calibrate examiner at 1 week (baseline), and 6-month, 12-month and 24-month, using the World Dental Federation (FDI) criteria. The outcome is retention of the restoration.
During restorative procedures, different isolation methods of the operative field can be used to promote moisture control and retraction of the gingival tissues. The aim of the present clinical trial is to evaluate the effects of two isolation techniques on the clinical performance of Class V restorations, as well on the periodontal conditions of restored sites. Patients presenting at least two noncarious cervical lesions (NCLs) will be enrolled in this study. The NCLs will be randomized into the following groups: (1) isolation performed with rubber dam and gingival retraction clamp and (2) isolation provided with cotton rolls and gingival retraction cord. Both techniques will be used with a saliva suction device. All restorative procedures were performed using a self-etching adhesive system and a nanofilled composite resin according to the manufacturer's instructions. The clinical performance of restorations will be recorded in terms of fracture and retention of restoration, marginal adaptation, marginal staining, postoperative hypersensitivity, and preservation of tooth vitality at 1 week, 6 months, 12, 24 and 72 months after placement. The periodontal condition of restored sites will be evaluated based on the presence of supragingival plaque, gingival marginal bleeding, probing depth, and relative gingival recession.