Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Not yet recruiting
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT06160271 |
Other study ID # |
2022PI044 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Not yet recruiting |
Phase |
Phase 2
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
September 1, 2024 |
Est. completion date |
June 1, 2027 |
Study information
Verified date |
November 2023 |
Source |
Central Hospital, Nancy, France |
Contact |
Chevalier Elodie, MD |
Phone |
+3383153475 |
Email |
e.chevalier[@]chru-nancy.fr |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), estimated to be 17% prevalent in France, can lead
to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), which in turn can progress to fibrosis, the ultimate
stage of which is cirrhosis, a major cause of liver transplantation. The prevalence of NASH
is increasing worldwide, along with that of type 2 diabetes and obesity. Significant liver
fibrosis is estimated to affect at least 2.6% of the adult population in France.
The prognosis of patients with NASH is directly linked to the stage of liver fibrosis
determined by biopsy, and these biopsies must now be repeated to assess the effect of
treatments. Hepatic fibrosis is traditionally classified into five stages, from the absence
of fibrosis (F0) to severe cirrhosis (F4), and passage from one stage to another is
considered to demonstrate significant variation, likely to impact prognosis.
However, liver biopsy is painful. It can only analyze a very small proportion of liver volume
(1/50,000), whereas the distribution of fibrosis is generally heterogeneous. Above all,
biopsy is not devoid of risks, primarily hemorrhage, which can sometimes be severe or even
fatal.
In line with current recommendations, clinical-biological algorithms, as well as ultrasound
elastography or MRI, are used to assess the risk of fibrosis and the value of a liver biopsy.
Generally speaking, these tests have the advantage of very good negative predictive values,
making it possible to exclude the possibility of significant fibrosis in a large proportion
of patients. However, their positive predictive values are weaker, even when these tests are
combined. Above all, they do not allow us to follow the evolution of the fibrosis stage over
time. This is why liver biopsies remain indispensable for determining the stage and severity
of hepatic fibrosis and monitoring its evolution. It is therefore essential to develop more
precise, non-invasive methods for accurately assessing the extent of liver fibrosis. This is
the objective of the FreSH national cohort, which uses conventional biological techniques and
in which our patients will also be included.
Description:
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), estimated to be 17% prevalent in France, can lead
to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), which in turn can progress to fibrosis, the ultimate
stage of which is cirrhosis, a major cause of liver transplantation. The prevalence of NASH
is increasing worldwide, along with that of type 2 diabetes and obesity. Significant liver
fibrosis is estimated to affect at least 2.6% of the adult population in France The prognosis
of patients with NASH is directly linked to the stage of liver fibrosis determined by biopsy,
and these biopsies must now be repeated to assess the effect of treatments. Hepatic fibrosis
is traditionally classified into five stages, from the absence of fibrosis (F0) to severe
cirrhosis (F4), and passage from one stage to another is considered to demonstrate
significant variation, likely to impact prognosis.
However, liver biopsy is painful. It can only analyze a very small proportion of liver volume
(1/50,000), whereas the distribution of fibrosis is generally heterogeneous. Above all,
biopsy is not devoid of risks, primarily hemorrhage, which can sometimes be severe or even
fatal.
In line with current recommendations, clinical-biological algorithms, as well as ultrasound
elastography or MRI, are used to assess the risk of fibrosis and the value of a liver biopsy.
Generally speaking, these tests have the advantage of very good negative predictive values,
making it possible to exclude the possibility of significant fibrosis in a large proportion
of patients. However, their positive predictive values are weaker, even when these tests are
combined. Above all, they do not allow us to follow the evolution of the fibrosis stage over
time. This is why liver biopsies remain indispensable for determining the stage and severity
of hepatic fibrosis and monitoring its evolution. It is therefore essential to develop more
precise, non-invasive methods for accurately assessing the extent of liver fibrosis. This is
the objective of the FreSH national cohort, which uses conventional biological techniques and
in which our patients will also be included.
The hypothesis behind this initial pilot study is that 68Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT imaging, which
targets fibroblast activating protein (FAP), could provide a precise assessment of the
severity and stages of liver fibrosis, as well as its distribution throughout the liver
volume, and could ultimately be a useful tool for non-invasive monitoring of patients
undergoing treatment. This technique has already been validated for the detection of numerous
cancers, including hepatocarcinomas, and is capable of assessing renal fibrosis (pilot study
with 15 patients), with a good correlation to biopsy and a direct link to glomerular
filtration rate.
Targeted receptor (FAP) data also strongly support our hypothesis:
- FAP expression is negligible in healthy livers and proportional to the degree of
fibrosis in pathological livers.
- Low plasma FAP concentrations rule out the hypothesis of hepatic fibrosis. PAF
inhibitors also represent a very promising avenue of therapeutic research in NASH.
The HEFITEP study will assess for the first time the discriminative power of 68Ga-FAPI-46
PET/CT for grading liver fibrosis with reference to centrally analyzed liver biopsy in
patients biopsied for suspected or proven non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH).