Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT01791036
Other study ID # 12-5231-B
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received February 11, 2013
Last updated March 2, 2015
Start date May 2013
Est. completion date March 2015

Study information

Verified date March 2015
Source University Health Network, Toronto
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority Canada: Health Canada
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Adductor canal block will provide adequate analgesia to patients undergoing arthroscopic ACL reconstruction surgery, yet result in less motor blockade than a femoral block.


Description:

This study is designed to demonstrate that postoperative analgesia produced by the adductor canal block is not inferior to that produced by femoral nerve block in patients undergoing arthroscopic ACL reconstruction surgery. The study will also compare the degree of motor blockade of the adductor canal block to that of the femoral nerve block.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 100
Est. completion date March 2015
Est. primary completion date March 2015
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender Both
Age group 18 Years to 50 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

American Society of Anesthesiologists(ASA)classification I-III, Patients 18 to 50 years of age, BMI 18 - 40. Patients scheduled for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery under general anesthesia and nerve blocks.

Exclusion Criteria:

Refusal or inability to provide informed consent. Any contraindication to regional anesthesia including coagulopathy or bleeding diathesis, allergy to local anesthetics, infection, nerve injury or malignancy at the site of the block.

History of alcohol/drug dependence. History of long term opioid intake or chronic pain disorder. History of preexisting neuropathy in the operative leg History of significant psychiatric conditions that may affect patient assessment.

Inability to understand the informed consent and demands of the study. Allergy to any of the components of the multimodal analgesic regimen.

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor), Primary Purpose: Treatment


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Procedure:
Adductor Canal Block
Examination of the adductor canal using ultrasound will be performed using a high frequency linear probe. Following this the ultrasound probe will be positioned perpendicular to the skin in the medial upper-thigh region. The ultrasound probe will be moved either cephalad or caudad from its initial position in order to visualize the femoral artery immediately deep to the middle of the sartorius muscle. This point will then be selected as the appropriate level for needle insertion. Sham blocks using subcutaneous injection of normal saline will be used in both groups to maintain patient blinding.
Femoral Nerve Block
Examination of the femoral nerve using ultrasound will be performed using a high frequency linear probe. Following this the ultrasound probe will be positioned perpendicular to the skin at the level of the femoral crease. The femoral artery will be identified and the femoral nerve will then be located immediately lateral to the artery, deep to the fascia iliaca and superficial to the iliopsoas muscle. The needle will be positioned next to the femoral nerve. Following this 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine with epinephrine will be injected incrementally over a 1 to 2 minute period. Sham blocks using subcutaneous injection of normal saline will be used in both groups to maintain patient blinding.

Locations

Country Name City State
Canada Women's College Hospital Toronto Ontario

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
University Health Network, Toronto

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Canada, 

References & Publications (3)

Dauri M, Fabbi E, Mariani P, Faria S, Carpenedo R, Sidiropoulou T, Coniglione F, Silvi MB, Sabato AF. Continuous femoral nerve block provides superior analgesia compared with continuous intra-articular and wound infusion after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009 Mar-Apr;34(2):95-9. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e31819baf98. — View Citation

Sakura S, Hara K, Ota J, Tadenuma S. Ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve blocks for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: effect of obturator nerve block during and after surgery. J Anesth. 2010 Jun;24(3):411-7. doi: 10.1007/s00540-010-0916-3. Epub 2010 Mar 12. — View Citation

Williams BA, Kentor ML, Vogt MT, Irrgang JJ, Bottegal MT, West RV, Harner CD, Fu FH, Williams JP. Reduction of verbal pain scores after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with 2-day continuous femoral nerve block: a randomized clinical trial. Anesthesiology. 2006 Feb;104(2):315-27. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Other Block procedure time Block procedure time from probe placement on the skin to time of needle exit min No
Other Block success 1 or 0 on both sensory and motor block testing after 30 min for success 30 min No
Primary Opioid consumption Postoperative cumulative opioid consumption during the first 24 hours. All doses of supplemental (PRN) oral and parenteral opioid analgesics required will be converted into equivalent doses of oral morphine 24 hours No
Primary Motor Blockade The degree of motor blockade 30 minutes following the block procedure 30 minutes No
Primary Pain Scores Visual Analog Pain scores at rest and with movement at admisssion and discharge from post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), AT DISCHARGE FROM same day surgery unit (SDC) and at 12, 24 and 48 hours 12,24 and 48 hours No
Secondary Sensory blockade The degree of sensory blockade 30 minutes following the block procedure 30 min No
Secondary Spread of local anesthetic Spread of local anesthetic from the injection site 30 min No
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT02484651 - Can Adequacy of Anesthesia Depth and Quality of Recovery be Influenced by the Level of Neuromuscular Blockade? Phase 4
Completed NCT01440933 - Efficacy of Sugammadex in Magnesium Pretreated Patients Phase 2
Recruiting NCT02778945 - Neuromuscular Blockade for Optimising Surgical Conditions During Spinal Surgery Phase 4
Recruiting NCT02966249 - Dexmetomidine Intrathecally and Intravenously Additionally to Spinal Anaesthesia, in Total Knee Arthroplasty Phase 4
Completed NCT02838134 - Deep Versus Moderate Muscle Relaxation During Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy in Enhancing Postoperative Recovery Phase 4
Completed NCT03734250 - D Vitamin Effects on Neuromuscular Blocker Reverse Time
Not yet recruiting NCT03287388 - MRI Measurement of the Effects of Deep Neuromuscular Blockade on the Abdominal Working Space During Laparoscopy N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT02648503 - Deep Neuromuscular Block and Sugammadex Versus Standard of Care on Quality of Recovery in Patient Undergo Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Phase 4
Completed NCT00895609 - Sugammadex and Neostigmine at Shallow Neuromuscular Blockade Phase 4
Completed NCT02483611 - Effects of Intravenous Lidocaine Associated With Magnesium Sulfate on the Cisatracurium-Induced Neuromuscular Block Phase 4
Completed NCT02320734 - Deep Neuromuscular Relaxation in Patients for Thoraco-laparoscopic Esophagectomy Phase 4
Recruiting NCT05005676 - Evaluation of the New Acceleromyograph TOF 3D N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT03460509 - Reversal With Low Doses of Sugammadex in Patients Undergoing Non-cardiac Surgery Phase 4
Completed NCT00828373 - The Influence of Intravenous Lidocaine on the Action of the Neuromuscular Blocker Rocuronium Phase 4