A Study In Patients With Neuropathic Pain From Post-Herpetic Neuralgia (PHN)

Neuralgia, Postherpetic Clinical Trial

Official title:

Study PXN110748: An Efficacy and Safety Study of XP13512 Compared With a Concurrent Placebo Control in Subjects With Neuropathic Pain Associated With Post-herpetic Neuralgia (PHN)

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT00619476
• Other study ID #: 110748
• Status: Completed
• Phase: Phase 2
• First received: February 7, 2008
• Last updated: July 15, 2013
• Start date: February 2008
• Est. completion date: July 2009

Study information

• Verified date: January 2013
• Source: XenoPort, Inc.
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Health authority: Canada: Health CanadaUnited States: Food and Drug Administration
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether gabapentin enacarbil (XP13512/GSK1838262), hereafter referred to as GEn is effective in the treatment of neuropathic pain associated with post-herpetic neuralgia (PHN).

Description:

The primary purpose of study PXN110748 was to evaluate efficacy and safety of 3 fixed doses of GEn in the treatment of PHN.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 376
• Est. completion date: July 2009
• Est. primary completion date: July 2009
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: Both
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• 18 years or older

• Female subjects are eligible if of non-childbearing potential or not lactating, has a negative pregnancy, and agrees to use one a specified highly effective method for avoiding pregnancy

• Documented medical diagnosis of PHN of with pain present for at least three months from the healing of a herpes zoster rash

• Baseline 24-hour average pain intensity score = 4.0 based on an 11-point PI-NRS

• Provides written informed consent in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements

Exclusion Criteria:

• Other chronic pain conditions not associated with PHN. However, the subject will not be excluded if:

• The pain is located at a different region of the body; and

• The pain intensity is not greater than the pain intensity of the PHN; and

• The subject can assess PHN pain independently of other pain

• Is unable to discontinue prohibited medications or non-drug therapies or procedures throughout the duration of the study

• Hepatic impairment defined as ALT or AST > 2x upper limit of normal (ULN), or alkaline phosphatase or bilirubin > 1.5x ULN

• Chronic hepatitis B or C

• Impaired renal function defined as creatinine clearance <60 mL/min or requiring hemodialysis

• Corrected QT (QTc) interval = 450 msec or QTc interval =480 msec for patients with Bundle Branch Block

• Uncontrolled hypertension at screen (sitting systolic >160 mmHg and/or sitting diastolic >90 mmHg)

• Current diagnosis of active epilepsy or any active seizure disorder requiring chronic therapy with antiepileptic drugs

• Medical condition or disorder that would interfere with the action, absorption, distribution, metabolism, or excretion of GEn, or, in the investigator's judgment

• Is considered to be clinically significant and may pose a safety concern, or,

• Could interfere with the accurate assessment of safety or efficacy, or,

• Could potentially affect a subject's safety or study outcome

• Meets criteria defined by the DSM-IV-TR for a major depressive episode or for active significant psychiatric disorders within last year

• Depression in remission, with or without antidepressant treatment, may participate, unless stable antidepressant regimen is a prohibited medication

• Antidepressant medication may not be changed or discontinued to meet entry criteria and must be stable for at least three months prior to enrollment

• History of clinically significant drug or alcohol abuse (DSM-IV-TR) or is unable to refrain from substance abuse throughout the study. Benzodiazepines or atypical benzodiazepines as hypnotic sleep agents permitted.

• Currently participating in another clinical study in which the subject is, or will be exposed to an investigational or non-investigational drug or device

• Has participated in a clinical study and was exposed to investigational or non-investigational drug or device:

• Within preceding month for studies unrelated to PHN, or

• Within preceding six months for studies related to PHN

• Treated previously with GEn

• History of allergic or medically significant adverse reaction to investigational products (including gabapentin) or their excipients, acetaminophen or related compounds

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor), Primary Purpose: Treatment

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Neuralgia
• Neuralgia, Postherpetic

Intervention

Drug:
• GEn 1200mg/day
gabapentin enacarbil 1200mg/day
• GEn 2400mg/day
gabapentin enacarbil 2400mg/day
• GEn 3600mg/day
gabapentin enacarbil 3600mg/day
• Placebo
placebo

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Canada	GSK Investigational Site	Brampton	Ontario
Canada	GSK Investigational Site	Kelowna	British Columbia
Canada	GSK Investigational Site	London	Ontario
Canada	GSK Investigational Site	Montreal	Quebec
Canada	GSK Investigational Site	Niagara Falls	Ontario
Canada	GSK Investigational Site	Quebec
Canada	GSK Investigational Site	Sherbrooke	Quebec
Canada	GSK Investigational Site	St-Romuald	Quebec
Canada	GSK Investigational Site	Thornhill	Ontario
Canada	GSK Investigational Site	Toronto	Ontario
Canada	GSK Investigational Site	Trois Rivières	Quebec
United States	GSK Investigational Site	Albuquerque	New Mexico
United States	GSK Investigational Site	Altoona	Pennsylvania
United States	GSK Investigational Site	Amherst	New York
United States	GSK Investigational Site	Arcadia	California
United States	GSK Investigational Site	Bingham Farms	Michigan
United States	GSK Investigational Site	Birmingham	Alabama
United States	GSK Investigational Site	Boston	Massachusetts
United States	GSK Investigational Site	Boulder	Colorado
United States	GSK Investigational Site	Bradenton	Florida
United States	GSK Investigational Site	Bradenton	Florida
United States	GSK Investigational Site	Brooklyn	New York
United States	GSK Investigational Site	Chandler	Arizona
United States	GSK Investigational Site	Charlotte	North Carolina
United States	GSK Investigational Site	Chicago	Illinois
United States	GSK Investigational Site	Cincinnati	Ohio
United States	GSK Investigational Site	Danville	Indiana
United States	GSK Investigational Site	Daytona Beach	Florida
United States	GSK Investigational Site	Decatur	Georgia
United States	GSK Investigational Site	Elkhart	Indiana
United States	GSK Investigational Site	Eugene	Oregon
United States	GSK Investigational Site	Gilbert	Arizona
United States	GSK Investigational Site	Greensboro	North Carolina
United States	GSK Investigational Site	Hallandale Beach	Florida
United States	GSK Investigational Site	Hickory	North Carolina
United States	GSK Investigational Site	High Point	North Carolina
United States	GSK Investigational Site	Hollywood	Florida
United States	GSK Investigational Site	Huntington Park	California
United States	GSK Investigational Site	Kansas City	Missouri
United States	GSK Investigational Site	Lebanon	New Hampshire
United States	GSK Investigational Site	Libertyville	Illinois
United States	GSK Investigational Site	Litchfield Park	Arizona
United States	GSK Investigational Site	Little Rock	Arkansas
United States	GSK Investigational Site	Marietta	Georgia
United States	GSK Investigational Site	Medford	Oregon
United States	GSK Investigational Site	Milwaukee	Wisconsin
United States	GSK Investigational Site	Naranja	Florida
United States	GSK Investigational Site	New Port Beach	California
United States	GSK Investigational Site	New Port Richey	Florida
United States	GSK Investigational Site	New York	New York
United States	GSK Investigational Site	New York	New York
United States	GSK Investigational Site	Norman	Oklahoma
United States	GSK Investigational Site	Northport	Alabama
United States	GSK Investigational Site	Northridge	California
United States	GSK Investigational Site	Ocala	Florida
United States	GSK Investigational Site	Oklahoma City	Oklahoma
United States	GSK Investigational Site	Olive Branch	Mississippi
United States	GSK Investigational Site	Oxnard	California
United States	GSK Investigational Site	Redondo Beach	California
United States	GSK Investigational Site	Reno	Nevada
United States	GSK Investigational Site	Riverside	California
United States	GSK Investigational Site	Rochester	New York
United States	GSK Investigational Site	Rockville	Maryland
United States	GSK Investigational Site	Salisbury	North Carolina
United States	GSK Investigational Site	San Antonio	Texas
United States	GSK Investigational Site	San Diego	California
United States	GSK Investigational Site	San Francisco	California
United States	GSK Investigational Site	Santa Monica	California
United States	GSK Investigational Site	Scottsdale	Arizona
United States	GSK Investigational Site	Shreveport	Louisiana
United States	GSK Investigational Site	St. Louis	Missouri
United States	GSK Investigational Site	St. Petersburg	Florida
United States	GSK Investigational Site	Tacoma	Washington
United States	GSK Investigational Site	Tallahassee	Florida
United States	GSK Investigational Site	Tampa	Florida
United States	GSK Investigational Site	Tampa	Florida
United States	GSK Investigational Site	Tampa	Florida
United States	GSK Investigational Site	Terre Haute	Indiana
United States	GSK Investigational Site	Tucson	Arizona
United States	GSK Investigational Site	Weber City	Virginia
United States	GSK Investigational Site	Wenatchee	Washington
United States	GSK Investigational Site	Winston-Salem	North Carolina
United States	GSK Investigational Site	Yakima	Washington

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
XenoPort, Inc.

Countries where clinical trial is conducted

United States,  Canada, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Change From Baseline in the Mean 24-hour Average Pain Intensity (API) Score at the End of Maintenance Treatment (EOMT) Using Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Data	Baseline and EOMT values are the calculated means of the daily 24-hour API scores for each participant during the last 7 days prior to randomization (Baseline) and the earliest date of Week 13 visit/Withdrawal visit/last dose of study drug (EOMT). Participants used a hand-held diary to rate their average pain intensity over the preceding 24 hours, using an 11-point PI-Numerical Rating Scale (0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine). LOCF was used if less than 4 days of diary data were provided. Change from baseline was calculated as EOMT score minus Baseline score.	Baseline and EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit)	No
Secondary	Change From Baseline in the Mean Night-time Average Pain Intensity (API) Score at EOMT Using LOCF Data	Night-time is defined as the time between going to bed at night and rising in the morning. Participants recorded night-time API on a daily basis in the morning upon awakening using an 11-point PI-NRS (0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine). Baseline and EOMT are as defined for the primary endpoint. Change from baseline wss calculated as the EOMT score minus the baseline score. An ANCOVA model with baseline value, BMI, grouped center as covariates was used.	Baseline and EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit)	No
Secondary	Change From Baseline in the Mean Current Morning Pain Intensity Score at EOMT Using LOCF Data	Current pain is defined as the participant's assessment of pain intensity "right now." Participants recorded their current morning pain intensity in the morning upon wakening using an 11-point PI-NRS (0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine). Baseline and EOMT are as defined for the primary endpoint. Change from baseline was calculated as the EOMT score minus the baseline score. An ANCOVA model with baseline value, BMI, grouped center as covariates was used.	Baseline and EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit)	No
Secondary	Change From Baseline in the Mean Night-time Worst Pain Intensity Score at EOMT Using LOCF Data	Night-time worst pain is defined as the participant's assessment of their worst pain between going to bed at night and rising in the morning. Participants recorded night-time worst pain in the morning upon awakening using an 11-point PI-NRS (0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine). Baseline and EOMT are as defined for the primary endpoint. Change from baseline was calculated as the EOMT score minus the baseline score. An ANCOVA model with baseline value, BMI, grouped center as covariates was used.	Baseline and EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit)	No
Secondary	Change From Baseline in the Mean Sleep Interference Score at EOMT Using LOCF Data	Participants assessed sleep interference due to pain on a daily basis using the 11-point NRS (0=pain does not interfere with sleep, 10=pain completely interferes with sleep). Baseline and EOMT are as defined for the primary endpoint. Change from baseline was calculated as the EOMT score minus the baseline score. An ANCOVA model with baseline value, BMI, grouped center as covariates was used.	Baseline and EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit)	No
Secondary	Change From Baseline in the Mean Day-time Average Pain Intensity(API) Score at EOMT Using LOCF Data	Day-time is defined as the time between rising in the morning and going to bed at night. Participants recorded day-time API on a daily basis in the evening before bedtime using an 11-point PI-NRS (0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine). Baseline and EOMT are as defined for the primary endpoint. Change from baseline was calculated as the EOMT score minus the baseline score. An ANCOVA model with baseline value, BMI, grouped center as covariates was used.	Baseline and EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit)	No
Secondary	Change From Baseline in the Mean Current Evening Pain Intensity Score at EOMT Using LOCF Data	Current pain is defined as the participant's assessment of pain intensity "right now." Participants recorded their current evening pain intensity in the evening before bedtime using an 11-point PI-NRS (0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine). Baseline and EOMT are as defined for the primary endpoint. Change from baseline was calculated as the EOMT score minus the baseline score. An ANCOVA model with baseline value, BMI, grouped center as covariates was used.	Baseline and EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit)	No
Secondary	Change From Baseline in the Mean Day-time Worst Pain Intensity Score at EOMT Using LOCF Data	Day-time worst pain is defined as the participant's assessment of their worst pain between rising in the morning and going to bed at night. Participants recorded day-time worst pain in the evening before bedtime using an 11-point PI-NRS (0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine). Baseline and EOMT are as defined for the primary endpoint. Change from baseline was calculated as the EOMT score minus the baseline score. An ANCOVA model with baseline value, BMI, grouped center as covariates was used.	Baseline and EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit)	No
Secondary	Change From Baseline in Pain Quality as Assessed by the Neuropathic Pain Scale (NPS) Summary Scores at EOMT Using LOCF Data	The NPS assesses pain qualities and consists of 11-items, 10 assessed on an 11-point NRS (0=no impact to 10=greatest impact); and 1 open-ended question not used in score calculation. 4 summary scores are calculated: NPS 10 (items 1-7, 9-11), NPS 8 (8 pain descriptor items), NPS Non-Allodynic (NA) (8 NA items), and NPS 4 (4 pain quality items); and range from 0 to 100 (0=no impact and 100=greatest impact). The analysis is based on the change from baseline (BL) (EOMT score minus the BL score) using an ANCOVA model with BL value, BMI, grouped center as covariates.	Baseline and EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit)	No
Secondary	Change From Baseline in Pain Characteristics and Intensity as Assessed by the Short Form-McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) at EOMT Using LOCF Data	The SF-MPQ, a general pain instrument, assesses the characteristics and intensity of pain and consists of 15-items assessed on a 4-point scale (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, and 3=severe). 3 summary scores are calculated: sensory score (sum of items 1-11, range 0-33), affective score (sum of items 12-15, range 0-12), total score (sum of items 1-15, range 0-45), where lower scores = lower pain/impact. Analysis is based on the change from baseline (BL) (EOMT score minus the BL score) using an ANCOVA model with BL value, BMI, grouped center as covariates.	Baseline and EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit)	No
Secondary	Change From Baseline in Dynamic Allodynia at EOMT Using LOCF Data	Dynamic allodynia (pain in response to a standardized light touch stimulus, a foam brush applied with light pressure to the site of maximum pain) was assessed by an 11-point PI-NRS (0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine). Baseline and EOMT are as defined for the primary endpoint. Change from baseline was calculated as the EOMT score minus the baseline score. An ANCOVA model with baseline value, BMI, grouped center as covariates was used.	Baseline and EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit)	No
Secondary	Number of Participants Who Are Responders on the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Questionnaire at EOMT Using LOCF Data	The PGIC is a single-item questionnaire designed to provide an overall assessment of treatment from the participant's perspective since the start of the study. It is measured on a 7-point scale, where 1=very much improved and 7=very much worse. A participant is considered a responder if they have a response of "very much improved" or "much improved." EOMT response is defined as the score recorded at the Week13/Withdrawal visit.	EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit)	No
Secondary	Number of Participants Achieving Various Levels of Percent Reduction From Baseline in the Mean 24-hour Average Pain Intensity Score at EOMT Using LOCF Data	Baseline and EOMT scores are the calculated means of the 24-hour average pain scores for each participant during the last 7 days prior to randomization and EOMT, respectively. Percent reduction from baseline was calculated as the [(EOMT score minus the baseline score)divided by the baseline score], multiplied by 100. The PI-NRS is an 11-point scale (0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine) by which a participant assesses their 24-hour average pain intensity.	Baseline and EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit)	No
Secondary	Time to Onset of Sustained Improvement in the 24-hour Average Pain Intensity Score	Sustained improvement in the 24-hour average pain intensity score is defined as at least 2 consecutive days on which the 24-hour average pain intensity score is >=2 points less than the mean 24-hour average pain intensity score at baseline. Time to onset is measured from baseline and was calculated as the first day of event minus the last day of baseline and is expressed in days. Baseline score is the calculated mean of the 24-hour average pain score for each participant during the last 7 days prior to randomization.	Anytime post-baseline until date of last dose of study medication (up to Week 13)	No
Secondary	Change From Baseline in the Mean Daily Dose in Milligrams of Rescue Medication at EOMT Using LOCF Data	Mean daily use of rescue medication (milligrams of acetaminophen) was calculated by determining the average number of tablets taken per day of rescue medication (Commerical Tylenol) during treatment and multiplying that by 500 mg. Baseline and EOMT are as defined for the primary endpoint. Change from baseline was calculated as the EOMT score minus the baseline score. An ANCOVA model with baseline value, BMI, grouped center as covariates was used.	Baseline and EOMT (Week 13 or early withdrawal)	No
Secondary	Change From Baseline in Severity of Pain and the Impact of Pain as Assessed by the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) at EOMT Using LOCF Data	The BPI, a general pain instrument, assesses the severity and interference of pain; and consists of 6 items assessed on an 11-point NRS (0=no impact and 10=greatest impact). 2 summary scores are calculated: BPI Severity Score (average of first 4 items) and BPI Interference Score (average of 7 responses to item 6); where each summary score ranges from 0 to 10 (0=no impact and 10=greatest impact). Analysis of this endpoint is based on the change from baseline (BL) (EOMT score minus the BL score) using an ANCOVA model with BL value, BMI, grouped center as covariates.	Baseline and EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit)	No
Secondary	Change From Baseline in Quality of Life as Assessed by the SF-36 at EOMT Using LOCF Data	The SF-36 is a general health-related quality of life instrument consisting of 36 items with various response options (Yes/No, 5- to 6-point Likert scale). Summary scores are calculated for 8 domains and 2 components (physical and mental); where scores range from 0 to 100 (higher scores = better quality of life). Analysis of this endpoint is based on the change from baseline (BL) (EOMT score minus the BL score) using an ANCOVA model with BL value, BMI, grouped center as covariates.	Baseline and EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit)	No
Secondary	Change From Baseline in Emotional Functioning as Assessed by the POMS-B at EOMT Using LOCF Data	The POMS-B, an emotional functioning instrument, assesses mood, tension, and other psychological symptoms and consists of 30-items assessed on a 5-point scale (0=not at all to 4=extremely). 6 summary scores are calculated: Tension/Anxiety, Depression/Rejection, Anger/Hostility, Vigor/Activity, Fatigue/Inertia, and Confusion/Bewilderment; and range from 0-20 (higher scores = more negative mood state). Analysis of this endpoint is based on the change from baseline (BL) (EOMT score minus the BL score) using an ANCOVA model with BL value, BMI, grouped center as covariates.	Baseline and EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit)	No
Secondary	Number of Participants Who Are Responders on the Clinician Global Impression of Change (CGIC) Questionnaire at EOMT Using LOCF Data	The CGIC is a single-item questionnaire designed to provide an overall assessment of treatment from the clinician's perspective since the start of the study. It is measured on a 7-point scale, where 1=very much improved and 7=very much worse. A participant is considered a responder if they have a response of "very much improved" or "much improved." EOMT response is defined as the score recorded at the Week13/Withdrawal visit.	EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit)	No