Ultrasound-guided Femoral Nerve Block Without Electrical Stimulation of Peripheral Nerves

Nerve Block Clinical Trial

— USvsUSEPN  

Official title:

Femoral Nerve Block: Comparison of the Effectiveness of Ultrasound Control Versus Ultrasound Control With Electrical Stimulation of Peripheral Nerves

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT05209490
• Other study ID #: 4 femoral block without EPN
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: February 1, 2022
• Est. completion date: June 30, 2022

Study information

• Verified date: August 2022
• Source: Mogilev Regional Clinical Hospital
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

There is little work comparing the effectiveness of a femoral nerve block performed only under US guidance or US plus electrical stimulation of the peripheral nerve (EPN). The authors have shown the same effectiveness of these techniques(1).But the effectiveness of the blockade of the femoral nerve (complete blockade) performed in different ways turned out to be low valve: 71.7% for ultrasound in combination with electrical stimulation versus 69% for only ultrasound guidance.

Research hypothesis: the blockade of the femoral nerve performed only under ultrasound control has the same effectiveness as the blockade performed under the ultrasound control with EPN.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 40
• Est. completion date: June 30, 2022
• Est. primary completion date: May 31, 2022
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years to 90 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• indication requiring anesthesia maintenance;

• patient's written consent about the type of anesthesia and possible complications of regional anesthesia

Exclusion Criteria:

• patient's refusal of application for the proposed form of anesthesia;

• patients younger than 18 years;

• patients weighing less than 50 kg;

• a physical status score of more than 3 determined by the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA);

• a history of allergic reactions to the drugs used;

• coagulopathies;

• infections of the skin at the injection site;

• neurological or neuromuscular diseases;

• severe liver diseases or kidney failures;

• an inability to cooperate with the patient.

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Efficiency
• Femoral Nerve
• Nerve Block
• Ultrasonography

Intervention

Procedure:
• Femoral nerve blockade under ultrasound control with a peripheral nerve stimulator
Following the ultrasound visualization of the femoral nerve, a insulated injection needle was connected to the nerve stimulator . Under ultrasound visualization guidance, the needle of the electronic nerve stimulator was positioned at the sciatic nerve (in plane) from its lateral side at a slightly superior position . A marker for LA introduction was the visualization of the needle end near the nerve, and a positive muscular response . Subsequently, the introduction of LA solution was initiated.If LA was spreading from the lateral side down to the nerve, then the needle was replaced to the upper point of the nerve and the rest of LA was introduced, and vice versa . The presence of a complete and incomplete spread of LA along the entire circumference of the nerve was assessed. Correspondingly, if the anesthetic was spreading upwardly, the needle would be downwardly replaced. In addition, a sciatic femoral nerve block is performed.
• femoral nerve blockade under ultrasound control without a peripheral nerve stimulator
Under ultrasound visualization guidance, the needle owas positioned at the femoral nerve (in plane) from its lateral side at a slightly superior position . A marker for LA introduction was the visualization of the needle end near the nerve. Subsequently, the introduction of LA solution was initiated. The position of the needle was corrected 1-2 times according to the type of anesthetic spread. If LA was spreading from the lateral side down to the nerve, then the needle was replaced to the upper point of the nerve and the rest of LA was introduced, and vice versa . The presence of a complete and incomplete spread of LA along the entire circumference of the nerve was assessed. Correspondingly, if the anesthetic was spreading upwardly, the needle would be downwardly replaced. In addition, a sciatic nerve block is performed.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Belarus	Mogilev Regional Clinical Hospital	Mogilev

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Mogilev Regional Clinical Hospital

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Belarus, 

References & Publications (1)

Sites BD, Beach ML, Chinn CD, Redborg KE, Gallagher JD. A comparison of sensory and motor loss after a femoral nerve block conducted with ultrasound versus ultrasound and nerve stimulation. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009 Sep-Oct;34(5):508-13. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e3181ae7306. — View Citation

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Other	The need for additional pain relief during surgery	The need for additional use of narcotic analgesics or local anesthesia during surgery (criterion-reporting of painful feelings during the operation). Based on the patient's complaint about pain of any intensity during the operation.	During the operation (start of operation - end of operation)
Primary	?omplete sensory femoral nerve block	The stimulus of the needle prick was applied to check the sensory block of thefemoral nerve. The assessment of skin sensitivity was carried out with the help of a similar scale: + +\ indicating a complete sensory block; +\ indicating a partial sensory block, a patient was unable to differentiate between the type of stimuli ; and -\ indicating that the skin sensitivity was fully preserved.	The quality of sensory blocks was assessed after 45 minutes of administration of the sciatic nerve block. The evaluation of the block was carried out by an anesthesiologist who was not involved in the study, and was blinded to solution that had been
Secondary	?omplete motor femoral nerve block	The assessment of the motor block was carried out with the help of the following scale: + +\ which indicated that movements were completely absent; +\ which indicated that movements were partially preserved or were uncoordinated; and -\ which indicated that movements were fully preserved.	The quality of motor blocks was assessed after 45 minutes of administration of the sciatic nerve block. The evaluation of the block was carried out by an anesthesiologist who was not involved in the study, and was blinded to solution that had been