Neostigmine Clinical Trial
Official title:
Can we Antagonize Mivacurium With Neostigmine
Verified date | May 2017 |
Source | Université Libre de Bruxelles |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
The antagonism of neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBA) (or curares), as well as the
antagonism of other drugs used in anesthesia, is a major challenge for the speciality.
Residual paralysis is indeed a risk factor for post-operative morbidity and mortality and
antagonization of curares at the end of the procedure is associated with a reduction in
mortality .
Its use should be as large as possible and its contraindications are extremely rare.
The antagonism of the NMBA reduces the duration of the neuromuscular block and the
complications that are associated .
In this study, the investigators use mivacurium (or Mivacron) as non-depolarizing curare and
neostigmine as an antagonist.
Neostigmine reduces the duration of the neuromuscular block induced by mivacurium, By
reducing the breakdown of acetylcholine, neostigmine induces an increase in acetylcholine in
the synaptic cleft which competes for the same binding site as nondepolarizing neuromuscular
blocking agents, and reverses the neuromuscular blockade.
But the use of neostigmine in current practice is not very widespread in this clinical
situation.
The reduction in the duration of the block is significant in comparison with a spontaneous
recovery .
Moreover, spontaneous recovery is not always complete and sometimes very long.
Nevertheless, its action is effective and this study could support this use but also specify
the duration and the quality of the return to normal of the neuromuscular transmission.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 80 |
Est. completion date | April 22, 2017 |
Est. primary completion date | April 22, 2017 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 75 Years |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Patients American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) 1 to 3 - Absence of neuromuscular disease, renal and hepatic insufficiency - Absence of medication that could interfere with the mediators of the neuromuscular junction Exclusion Criteria: - Bronchial asthma - Parkinson disease - BMI> 35 - Known hypersensitivity to neostigmine or to any of the excipients of Neostigmine |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Belgium | Michel Baurain | Bruxelles Capitale |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Université Libre de Bruxelles |
Belgium,
Baillard C, Clec'h C, Catineau J, Salhi F, Gehan G, Cupa M, Samama CM. Postoperative residual neuromuscular block: a survey of management. Br J Anaesth. 2005 Nov;95(5):622-6. Epub 2005 Sep 23. — View Citation
Baurain MJ, Dernovoi BS, d'Hollander AA, Hennart DA. Comparison of neostigmine-induced recovery with spontaneous recovery from mivacurium-induced neuromuscular block. Br J Anaesth. 1994 Dec;73(6):791-4. — View Citation
Szenohradszky J, Fogarty D, Kirkegaard-Nielsen H, Brown R, Sharma ML, Fisher DM. Effect of edrophonium and neostigmine on the pharmacokinetics and neuromuscular effects of mivacurium. Anesthesiology. 2000 Mar;92(3):708-14. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Change in TOF ( Train Of Four) measure | for each patient, measure of Train Of Four at 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 minutes |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT05794503 -
Postoperative Urinary Retention After Reversal of Neuromuscular Block by Neostigmine Versus Sugammadex
|
Early Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT05066035 -
Residual Paralysis and Reversal With Routine Neostigmine Versus Half-dose Sugammadex and Routine Neostigmine
|
Phase 4 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT06081738 -
Neostigmine Versus Sugammadex on Renal Functions
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT04920682 -
Reversal of Moderate or Superficial Neuromuscular Blockade Induced by Cisatracurium
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT04244266 -
Observational Study in Bariatric Surgery
|
||
Completed |
NCT04332627 -
Comparison of QoR-15 in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Sugammadex vs. Neostigmine
|
Phase 4 |