Paramedian CESI vs Selective Nerve Root PRF for Lower Cervical Radicular

Status Completed

Clinical Trial Summary

This study aims to compare the efficacy of ultrasound-guided selective cervical nerve root pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) versus fluoroscopy-guided paramedian cervical epidural steroid administration (CESI) for the treatment of lower cervical radicular pain refractory to conservative treatments. For this evaluation, a numerical rating (NRS), neck disability index (NDI), and Leeds Assessment Of Neuropathic Symptoms And Signs (LANSS) scale will be used before and after both interventions.

Clinical Trial Description

Chronic cervical radicular pain is a common condition that affects the quality of life of many patients and is caused by compression or irritation of the cervical nerve roots. Treatment options for this condition include conservative methods such as medications and physical therapy, as well as interventions such as surgery or injections. Two commonly used injections for chronic cervical radicular pain are ultrasound-guided selective nerve root PRF and fluoroscopy-guided paramedian CESI. PRF involves the application of pulsed radiofrequency energy (intermittent current, tissue temperature not exceeding 42 °C) to the cervical nerve root under ultrasound guidance. PRF is a non-destructive technique that modulates the activity of nerve fibers without causing thermal damage. CESI involves injecting local anesthetic and steroids into the epidural space between the laminae of the vertebrae under fluoroscopic guidance. The aim of both techniques is to reduce inflammation and pain transmission from the affected nerve root. The efficacy of both CESI and selective nerve root PRF has been demonstrated in clinical trials. The primary aim of the investigators in this study is to compare the efficacy of these two treatments. A total of at least 60 patients, 30 patients in each group, will be enrolled for comparison. NRS, NDI, and LANSS scores before, 3 months, and 6 months after treatment will be compared both within and between groups. The secondary aim is to reveal the side effects and adverse events in these two treatment modalities. ;

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

Clinical Trial Details

NCT number	NCT05950321
Study type	Interventional
Source	Diskapi Teaching and Research Hospital
Contact
Status	Completed
Phase	N/A
Start date	August 1, 2022
Completion date	August 20, 2023

View Details

See also
Status	Clinical Trial	Phase
Completed	`NCT05293847` - Postural Based Telerehabilitation in Mechanic Neck Pain	N/A
Completed	`NCT04060004` - The Effects of Dry Needling on the Superficial Neck Musculature	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT06204627` - TDCS* and Laterality Trainnning in Patients With Chronic Neck Pain	N/A
Active, not recruiting	`NCT05870371` - The Effect of the Feldenkrais Method on Pain and Function in Patients With Chronic Neck Pain	N/A
Completed	`NCT06049316` - Scapular Stabilization vs Functional Exercises on Chronic Neck Pain	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT05944354` - Wearable Spine Health System for Military Readiness
Completed	`NCT02731014` - Dry Needling for Patients With Neck Pain	N/A
Completed	`NCT02904668` - Self-management Program in Chronic Neck Pain	N/A
Completed	`NCT03147508` - Investigating Clinical Indicators of Spine Related Dysfunction Patterns. A Clinical Study on Neck Pain Patients.
Completed	`NCT02882061` - Examination of Cervical Thoracic Differentiation Testing in Individuals With Neck Pain	N/A
Completed	`NCT02638987` - EMG Activity Before, During and After Dry Needling	N/A
Active, not recruiting	`NCT02843269` - Multiple-component Workplace FRamed Intervention to Decrease Occupational Muscle Pain - FRIDOM	N/A
Enrolling by invitation	`NCT02485795` - Observational Study of the Impact of Genetic Testing on Healthcare Decisions and Care in Interventional Pain Management	N/A
Completed	`NCT02225873` - The Effectiveness of Exercises Protocol in Management of Neck Pain	N/A
Completed	`NCT02245425` - Comparison of Two Thoracic Manipulation Techniques to Improve Neck Pain	N/A
Completed	`NCT02235207` - Effectiveness of Fustra—Exercise Program in Neck and Low Back Pain	N/A
Completed	`NCT02190890` - Dry Needling Dosage in the Treatment of Myofascial Neck Pain	N/A
Completed	`NCT02051478` - Thoracic Manipulation and Mobilization for Neck Pain	N/A
Completed	`NCT01938209` - A Comparison of Seated Thoracic Manipulation and Targeted Supine Thoracic Manipulation on Cervical Flexion Motion and Pain	N/A
Completed	`NCT01233180` - Effects of Gua Sha and Thermotherapy on Chronic Neck Pain	N/A

Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.

Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.

Paramedian CESI vs Selective Nerve Root PRF for Lower Cervical Radicular Pain

Clinical Trial Summary

Clinical Trial Description

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms