Effects of Painful Compared to Painless Manual Therapy on Pain Processing in University Students With Neck Pain

Neck Pain Clinical Trial

Official title:

Conditioned Pain Modulation Effects of Manual Therapy in University Students With Recurrent or Chronic Neck Pain

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT05680688
• Other study ID #: PAINMT1
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: January 11, 2023
• Est. completion date: February 21, 2023

Study information

• Verified date: June 2023
• Source: Universidad Rey Juan Carlos
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of provoking pain with manual therapy on pain processing in university students with recurrent or chronic neck pain.

Description:

The mechanical stimulus produced in manual therapy (MT) techniques elicits neurophysiological responses within the peripheral and central nervous system responsible for pain inhibition. Almost all types of MT elicit a neurophysiological response that is associated with the descending pain modulation circuit. But it has not been demonstrated whether this inhibition occurs through a conditioned pain modulation mechanism generated by the pain that manual therapy techniques may elicit in the patient.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 38
• Est. completion date: February 21, 2023
• Est. primary completion date: February 14, 2023
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years to 65 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• University students
• Chronic neck pain (persistent pain > 3 months almost every day of the week) or recurrent neck pain (repeated episodes of neck pain starting > 3 months ago with pain-free periods)
• Non-specific neck pain (pain in the neck region that is not attributable to a known specific such as herniated disc, myelopathy, fractures, spinal stenosis, neoplasm etc. nor is it associated with traumatic causes such as whiplash)
• Mean NRS score the last week > 2/10 and presence of pain on the day of assesment and treatment

Exclusion Criteria:

• Signs of radiculopathy or neuropathic pain
• Neck surgeries
• Inflammatory rheumatic
• Neurological, cardiorespiratory, oncological or psychiatric disease
• Pregnancy
• Not being able to read Spanish in order to fill in the questionnaires

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Neck Pain

Intervention

Other:
• Manual Therapy
Postero-anterior mobilizations: the physiotherapist will place his thumbs on the posterior surface of the spinous process of the vertebra previously assessed as the most painful to mobilise. The oscillations will be performed at the frequency of 1 oscillation per second and will be performed 3 series of 3 minutes, with a 1 minute rest interval. Pressure: The point of greatest pain shall be treated by maintained pressure in each of the following areas: right upper trapezius, left upper trapezius, right paravertebral musculature and left paravertebral musculature. Pressure shall be applied to each of the points for 1 minute. Massage: Pressure is applied to the muscles by sliding along the muscle belly. This will be done slowly to control the pain that is being provoked. 3 minutes will be carried out on each upper trapezius, sliding from the acromion to the occipital and another 3 minutes on the paravertebral musculature on each side, sliding from T1 to the occipital.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Spain	Universidad Rey Juan Carlos	Alcorcón	Madrid

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Josue Fernandez Carnero

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Spain, 

References & Publications (4)

Bialosky JE, Beneciuk JM, Bishop MD, Coronado RA, Penza CW, Simon CB, George SZ. Unraveling the Mechanisms of Manual Therapy: Modeling an Approach. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2018 Jan;48(1):8-18. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2018.7476. Epub 2017 Oct 15. — View Citation

Melzack R. Prolonged relief of pain by brief, intense transcutaneous somatic stimulation. Pain. 1975 Dec;1(4):357-373. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(75)90073-1. — View Citation

Vigotsky AD, Bruhns RP. The Role of Descending Modulation in Manual Therapy and Its Analgesic Implications: A Narrative Review. Pain Res Treat. 2015;2015:292805. doi: 10.1155/2015/292805. Epub 2015 Dec 16. Erratum In: Pain Res Treat. 2017;2017:1535473. — View Citation

WAND-TETLEY JI. Historical methods of counter-irritation. Ann Phys Med. 1956 Jul;3(3):90-9. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/iii.3.90. No abstract available. — View Citation

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Change from Baseline in Tibialis Anterior Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT) to immediate post-intervention	PPTs will be assessed bilaterally (the mean between both sides will be used for analysis) over the tibialis anterior muscle (remote pain-free area) using a digital algometer (Wagner instruments, Greenwich, CT, USA). Participants will be instructed to say "stop" when the pressure sensation becomes painful. The average of two trials for each side will be performed for analysis. The algometer pressure for assessment will be gradually increased at a rate of 1kg/second. Data will be collected in kg/cm2.	At baseline and immediately after the intervention
Primary	Change from Baseline in extensor carpi ulnaris PPT to immediate post-intervention	PPTs will be assessed bilaterally (the mean between both sides will be used for analysis) over the extensor carpi ulnaris muscle (remote pain-free area) using a digital algometer (Model FPX, Wagner instruments, Greenwich, CT, USA). Participants will be instructed to say "stop" when the pressure sensation becomes painful. The average of two trials for each side will be performed for analysis. The algometer pressure for assessment will be gradually increased at a rate of 1kg/second. Data will be collected in kg/cm2.	At baseline and immediately after the intervention
Primary	Change from Baseline in upper trapezius PPT to immediate post-intervention	PPTs will be assessed bilaterally (the mean between both sides will be used for analysis) over the extensor upper trapezius muscle (symptomatic area) using a digital algometer (Model FPX, Wagner instruments, Greenwich, CT, USA). Participants will be instructed to say "stop" when the pressure sensation becomes painful. The average of two trials for each side will be performed for analysis. The algometer pressure for assessment will be gradually increased at a rate of 1kg/second. Data will be collected in kg/cm2.	At baseline and immediately after the intervention
Primary	Change from Baseline in spinous process of C7 PPT to immediate post-intervention	PPT will be assessed over the spinous process of C7 (cervical innervated-related area) using a digital algometer (Model FPX, Wagner instruments, Greenwich, CT, USA). Participants will be instructed to say "stop" when the pressure sensation becomes painful. The average of two trials will be performed for analysis. The algometer pressure for assessment will be gradually increased at a rate of 1kg/second. Data will be collected in kg/cm2.	At baseline and immediately after the intervention
Secondary	Change from Baseline in Pain Intensity by Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) to immediate post-intervention	The NRS measures the pain intensity using a 11-point scale. Rank from 0 to 10, with the 0-end point labeled with "no pain" and the 10-end point labeled as "worst imaginable pain".	At baseline and immediately after the intervention
Secondary	Change from Baseline in Pain Intensity by NRS to 4 hours post-intervention	The NRS measures the pain intensity using a 11-point scale. Rank from 0 to 10, with the 0-end point labeled with "no pain" and the 10-end point labeled as "worst imaginable pain".	At baseline and 4 hours after the intervention
Secondary	Change from Baseline in Pain Intensity by NRS to 1 day post-intervention	The NRS measures the pain intensity using a 11-point scale. Rank from 0 to 10, with the 0-end point labeled with "no pain" and the 10-end point labeled as "worst imaginable pain".	At baseline and 1 day after the intervention
Secondary	Change from Baseline in Pain Intensity by NRS to 2 days post-intervention	The NRS measures the pain intensity using a 11-point scale. Rank from 0 to 10, with the 0-end point labeled with "no pain" and the 10-end point labeled as "worst imaginable pain".	At baseline and 2 days after the intervention
Secondary	Change from Baseline in Pain Intensity by NRS to 3 days post-intervention	The NRS measures the pain intensity using a 11-point scale. Rank from 0 to 10, with the 0-end point labeled with "no pain" and the 10-end point labeled as "worst imaginable pain".	At baseline and 3 days after the intervention
Secondary	Change from Baseline in Pain Intensity by NRS to 4 days post-intervention	The NRS measures the pain intensity using a 11-point scale. Rank from 0 to 10, with the 0-end point labeled with "no pain" and the 10-end point labeled as "worst imaginable pain".	At baseline and 4 days after the intervention
Secondary	Change from Baseline in Pain Intensity by NRS to 5 days post-intervention	The NRS measures the pain intensity using a 11-point scale. Rank from 0 to 10, with the 0-end point labeled with "no pain" and the 10-end point labeled as "worst imaginable pain".	At baseline and 5 days after the intervention
Secondary	Change from Baseline in Pain Intensity by NRS to 6 days post-intervention	The NRS measures the pain intensity using a 11-point scale. Rank from 0 to 10, with the 0-end point labeled with "no pain" and the 10-end point labeled as "worst imaginable pain".	At baseline and 6 days after the intervention
Secondary	Change from Baseline in Pain Intensity by NRS to 7 days post-intervention	The NRS measures the pain intensity using a 11-point scale. Rank from 0 to 10, with the 0-end point labeled with "no pain" and the 10-end point labeled as "worst imaginable pain".	At baseline and 7 days after the intervention
Secondary	Self-perceived improvement by Global Rating of Change (GROC scale) immediately after the intervention	The GROC assesses self-perceived improvement on a scale from -7 (a very great deal worse) to +7 (a very great deal better).	Immediately after the intervention
Secondary	Self-perceived improvement by Global Rating of Change (GROC scale) 7 days after the intervention	The GROC assesses self-perceived improvement on a scale from -7 (a very great deal worse) to +7 (a very great deal better).	7 days after the intervention
Secondary	Change from Baseline in Parallel Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM) to immediate post-intervention	To evaluate conditioned pain modulation (CPM), a handheld pressure algometer will be used as the test stimulus to evaluate the PPT at the nail bed of the thumb of the symptomatic side before and during application of a conditioning stimulus. Ischemic muscle pain will be used as the conditioning stimulus using a sphygmomanometer. The sphygmomanometer will be applied around the upper arm of the asymptomatic side, with its lower rim 3 cm proximal to the cubital fossa. The cuff was inflated to 260 mmHg and maintained until the subject perceived a 7/10 pain on the NRS. The CPM will be the result of the PPT during the conditioning stimulus minus the PPT before the conditioning stimulus.	At baseline and immediately after the intervention
Secondary	Change from Baseline in Sequential Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM) to immediate post-intervention	To evaluate conditioned pain modulation (CPM), a handheld pressure algometer (Model FPX, Wagner instruments, Greenwich, CT, USA) will be used as the test stimulus to evaluate the PPT at the nail bed of the thumb of the symptomatic side before and 1 minute after application of a conditioning stimulus. Ischemic muscle pain will be used as the conditioning stimulus using a sphygmomanometer. The sphygmomanometer will be applied around the upper arm of the asymptomatic side, with its lower rim 3 cm proximal to the cubital fossa. The cuff was inflated to 260 mmHg and maintained until the subject perceived a 7/10 pain on the NRS. The CPM will be the result of the PPT after the conditioning stimulus minus the PPT before the conditioning stimulus.	At baseline and immediately after the intervention
Secondary	Change from Baseline in Termporal Summation of Pain (TSP) to immediate post-intervention	TSP will be elicited with 10 applications of the algometer (Model FPX, Wagner instruments, Greenwich, CT, USA) at the individual PPT intensity perceived at the nail bed of the thumb of the asymptomatic side. For each pulse, the pressure will be increased at a rate of approximately 2 kg/second to the previously determined PPT intensity. Pulses will be presented with an interstimulus interval of 1 second because this has previously been shown to be optimal for inducing TSP with pressure pain. Before application of the first pressure pulse, subjects were instructed to manually rate the pain intensity of the first and 10th pulse with a NRS. The TSP will be calculated as the difference between the pain intensity of the tenth stimulus minus the first stimulus.	At baseline and immediately after the intervention
Secondary	Change from Baseline in Cold Pain Intensity to immediate post-intervention	Cold pain intensity will be evaluated with the subject resting on a chair with the ice application test. Testing will be conducted on the anterior skin of the right forearm.; For the ice application test, the ice pack will be held on the skin for 10 s. After 10 s of ice application, subjects will be instructed to rate the intensity of pain on NRS. The procedure will be repeated three times to obtain a mean value, with a 60 s rest period between measures to avoid summation of pain.	At baseline and immediately after the intervention