Neck Pain Clinical Trial
Official title:
Immediate Effect of a Single Cervical Spinal Manipulation on Cervical Movement Pattern
Objective: The aim of the present study is to analyze the immediate effect of a single
cervical spinal manipulation on cervical movement pattern. Further, To perform the sample
size calculation, the investigators took into consideration that the investigators pretend to
achieve a medium effect size (d=0.5) of the differences with two groups (EG and CG) and two
aimed to explore the impact on pain, disability and patient's improvement-perceived
sensation, comparing with a placebo.
Methods: The study design is experimental and purposive sampling was used to select the study
participants. The grouping allocation was randomized. The people volunteer to participate in
the study, are assigned to the experimental group (EG) that will receive a single
manipulation, to the control group (CG) that will receive a single placebo treatment.
The participants will be assessed twice, one before the treatment and the other, after the
end. Head movement is recorded by means of a video-photogrammetry system from the coordinates
of a set of eight reflective markers located on a helmet. The movements will be record at 200
fps.
In each evaluation, the perceived pain and the neck disability index are also recorded. And
the impression of change is evaluated only in the second evaluation.
Outcomes. Pain, Disability of the neck, Impression of Change, Range of motion (RoM), Maximum
angular velocity (MAV), Maximum angular acceleration (MAA) and Harmonicity (HARM).
Intervention: The intervention, in both groups, it includes only one session that lasted 15
minutes approximately: a) Cervical manipulation intervention and b)Placebo intervention.
INTRODUCTION Non-specific neck pain is defined as pain in the posterior and lateral aspect of
the neck between the superior nuchal line and the spinous process of the first thoracic
vertebra with no signs or symptoms of major structural pathology. It is a common
musculoskeletal disorder that leads to substantial disability, discomfort, and reduced
cervical mobility, resulting in enormous health costs in terms of treatment and work
absenteeism. The American Physical Therapy Association's guidelines on neck pain recommends
utilizing cervical manipulation (CM) and mobilization procedures to reduce neck pain based on
strong evidence. Spinal manipulation is defined as "a passive, high velocity, low amplitude
thrust applied to a joint complex within its anatomical limit with the intent to restore
optimal motion, function, and/or to reduce pain" and its effectiveness, concretely of a
continuous program of cervical manipulations (CM), on neck pain has been largely studied. A
previous systematic review concluded that treatments based on CM are effective both alone and
in combination with exercises whilst other systematic reviews and an evidence-based guideline
showed that CM, combined with exercises, resulted to be more effective for neck pain,
function, and global perceived effect, than a therapeutic program based, exclusively, on CM.
Nevertheless, the underlying mechanisms of the pain decrease with this therapeutic approach
are not completely understood. A recent study aimed at analyzing the biomechanics of a single
CM, used a complex system of synchronized biplane radiographs to measure the facet gapping
during a single manipulation. Authors demonstrated that target and adjacent motion segments
undergo facet joint gapping during a manipulation and that segmental and global range of
motion (ROM) increases in all three planes of motion immediately after one manipulation.
In the clinical setting, the best of our knowledge, only one previous clinical trial have
analyzed the effectiveness of a single cervical manipulation on cervical range of motion,
comparing with placebo, demonstrating an improvement in all the global maximum cervical
movements, measured with the goniometer. However, pain may affect other movement'
characteristics beside the maximum range of motion (ROM), as velocity, variability or
movement harmony.
Nevertheless, no previous study has analyzed the characteristics of the patients' cervical
motion pattern after a single manipulation which could provide information about functional
changes in cervical movements. People with neck pain, has shown more slow movements, less
harmonic movements in the points close to pain and exponential trend at the ends of the
range, even when cervical spine motion ranges remain within normal limits.
The investigators hypothesized that functional assessment of the cervical spine based on the
analysis of the motion pattern, will let us know if a single manipulation is effective in the
improvement of those variables.
The aim of the present study is to analyze the immediate effect of a single cervical spinal
manipulation on cervical movement pattern. Further, the investigators aimed to explore the
impact on pain, disability and patient's improvement-perceived sensation, comparing with a
placebo.
METHODS Participants The study design is experimental and purposive sampling was used to
select the study participants. The grouping allocation was randomized. The people volunteer
to participate in the study, are assigned to the experimental group (EG) that will receive a
single CM, to the control group (CG) that will receive a single placebo treatment.
All the participants should meet the following inclusion criteria: perceived pain scored 3 or
above, in a visual analogue scale, and neck functional status revealing a mild disability.
Additionally, patients had symptoms duration less than 30 days.
For both groups, the exclusion criteria include an inflammatory rheumatic disease or an inner
ear disorder, the use of antidepressant opioid or sedative drugs, current vertigo or
dizziness, visual loss, neurological disorder, and trunk or shoulder surgery within the past
year.
Sample size To perform the sample size calculation, the investigators took into consideration
to achieve a medium effect size (d=0.5) of the differences with two groups (EG and CG) and
two assessments (pre and post-treatment). Further, the investigators set a type I error of
5%, and a type II error of 20%. This power calculation resulted in 17 patients on each group.
Assessment procedures The participants will be assessed twice, one before the treatment and
the other, after the end. Head movement is recorded by means of a video-photogrammetry system
from the coordinates of a set of eight reflective markers located on a helmet. The movements
will be record at 200 fps.
Participants sit in a chair with the trunk fixed at the back by means of belts. In each
session, they perform three movements: flexion-extension (FE), lateral flexion (LB) and axial
rotation (AR) whose order was randomized. Each movement will be perform seven consecutive
times without stopping and achieving a continuous and smooth cyclic movement with the maximum
achievable range at their preferred speed. The participants are encouraged to practice the
three movements before the test begins, to avoid the learning effect.
In each evaluation, the perceived pain and the neck disability index are also recorded. And
the impression of change is evaluated only in the second evaluation.
Outcomes Pain, with the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), in which the patients marked their level
of pain intensity on a 10-cm horizontal line (0= no pain to 10= maximum pain) at the time the
assessment was carried out.
Disability of the neck, with the 'Neck Disability Index', a self-report questionnaire used to
determine how neck pain affects a patient's daily life. Scoring is reported on a 0-50 scale,
0 being the best possible score.
Impression of Change, with the self-reported measure 'Patient Global Impression of Change'
that reflects a patient's belief about the efficacy of treatment.
Range of motion (RoM): angular excursion of the cervical motion. Maximum angular
velocity(MAV), it is measured as percentile 95 of angular velocity during the test.
Maximum angular acceleration(MAA), it is measas percentile 95 of angular acceleration during
the test.
Harmonicity (HARM): is the absolute value of the correlation coefficient between two motion.
Thus HARM quantifies the fit between the actual movement and the simple harmonic motion.
Intervention The intervention, in both groups, it includes only one session that lasted 15
minutes approximately. Participants should wear a sleeveless shirt that allows the
physiotherapist to treat the neck region. Evaluations and manipulations are performed by the
same experienced physiotherapist.
Cervical manipulation intervention Prior to intervention, a screened for any signs of
vertebrobasilar insufficiency is performed by means of the vertebral artery compromise test,
as well as the root compression test using the Jackson test, and the screening for upper
cervical spine ligamentous instability through Sharp-Purser test, alar ligament stress test
and transverse ligament test.
To perform the evaluation and detect the cervical vertebral level with mobility restriction,
with the patient in supine position, a cervical examination is carried out to determine the
mobility restriction, both in flexo-extension, as in inclination and rotation. To check the
level of restriction, the post-anterior sliding test is performed.
Once the vertebral levels with restriction have been detected, high speed and low amplitude
manipulation is carried out based on the location of the pain and the detection of the
perceived joint hypomobility, using the clinical criterion for this, with a maximum of 2
manipulative attempts by vertebral level, regardless of having achieved joint cavitation. The
manipulation is performed following the criteria of thrust manipulations. A maximum of 3
manipulations are applied in total per subject, one for each level (high level C1-C2, medium
level C3-C6, and low level C7), if necessary.
Placebo intervention This group will receive 15 minutes of sham techniques in a supine
position over the stretcher. First, a series of short-time and no pressure contact with
physiotherapist´s hands is performed in several points of head and shoulders for 10 minutes.
Subsequently, light touch is applied on standardized anatomic areas, equal to those treated
with manipulative intervention, for 2 minutes each time, adding a total duration of
approximately 15 minutes, similar to the intervention group.
Statistics Standard statistical methods will be use to obtain the mean and standard deviation
of the mean (SD). For the inferential analysis of the data, a mixed two-factor multivariate
analysis of variance (MANOVA) with a between-subject factor 'group' (i.e. CG and EG) ant a
within-subject factor 'time' with two groups (pre and post-intervention). Multiple comparison
techniques are performed using Bonferroni correction. The investigators will evaluate the
assumption of homoscedasticity and it will be assumed in each variable. In addition, the
investigators will compare the perceived changes after treatment between the two groups with
an independent Student T test. Type I error will be set as <5% (p <.05).
;
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT05293847 -
Postural Based Telerehabilitation in Mechanic Neck Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04060004 -
The Effects of Dry Needling on the Superficial Neck Musculature
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06204627 -
TDCS* and Laterality Trainnning in Patients With Chronic Neck Pain
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05870371 -
The Effect of the Feldenkrais Method on Pain and Function in Patients With Chronic Neck Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06049316 -
Scapular Stabilization vs Functional Exercises on Chronic Neck Pain
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05944354 -
Wearable Spine Health System for Military Readiness
|
||
Completed |
NCT02731014 -
Dry Needling for Patients With Neck Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02882061 -
Examination of Cervical Thoracic Differentiation Testing in Individuals With Neck Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03147508 -
Investigating Clinical Indicators of Spine Related Dysfunction Patterns. A Clinical Study on Neck Pain Patients.
|
||
Completed |
NCT02904668 -
Self-management Program in Chronic Neck Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02638987 -
EMG Activity Before, During and After Dry Needling
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT02843269 -
Multiple-component Workplace FRamed Intervention to Decrease Occupational Muscle Pain - FRIDOM
|
N/A | |
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT02485795 -
Observational Study of the Impact of Genetic Testing on Healthcare Decisions and Care in Interventional Pain Management
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02225873 -
The Effectiveness of Exercises Protocol in Management of Neck Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02245425 -
Comparison of Two Thoracic Manipulation Techniques to Improve Neck Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02235207 -
Effectiveness of Fustra—Exercise Program in Neck and Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02190890 -
Dry Needling Dosage in the Treatment of Myofascial Neck Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02051478 -
Thoracic Manipulation and Mobilization for Neck Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01938209 -
A Comparison of Seated Thoracic Manipulation and Targeted Supine Thoracic Manipulation on Cervical Flexion Motion and Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01233180 -
Effects of Gua Sha and Thermotherapy on Chronic Neck Pain
|
N/A |