Neck Pain Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Trial to Study the Efficacy and Safety of Cyclobenzaprine HCl Extended Release (CER) 15 mg in Subjects With Acute Cervical and/or Lower Back Pain Due to Muscle Spasms of Local Origin
Verified date | January 2019 |
Source | Takeda |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of cyclobenzaprine hydrochloride (HCl) extended release (CER) 15 mg capsule once daily in participants with muscle spasms associated with acute painful musculoskeletal conditions.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 180 |
Est. completion date | March 14, 2017 |
Est. primary completion date | February 10, 2017 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 50 Years |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: 1. In the opinion of the investigator, the participant is capable of understanding and complying with protocol requirements. 2. Signs and dates a written, informed consent form and any required privacy authorization prior to the initiation of any study procedures. 3. Is experiencing for no more than 14 days cervical or lower back pain (as assessed by the participant) due to muscle spasms (confirmed by the physician) associated with acute, painful musculoskeletal conditions. 4. Is male or female and aged 18 to 50 years, inclusive. 5. Female participants require to be either 2 years postmenopausal or surgically sterile by bilateral tubal ligation, hysterectomy, or bilateral oophorectomy, or, if premenopausal, had to be using an approved contraceptive method. 6. Female participants of child-bearing potential must have a negative urine human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) test result for pregnancy at study entry. 7. After signing the informed consent form, the participant agrees not to make changes to dietary, exercise, or smoking habits and not to enter a weight loss program during his/her participation in the study. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Has muscular pain secondary to acute trauma or fractures (e.g., due to osteoporosis). Such conditions could have been ruled out based on medical history, x-ray, or physical examination. 2. Has received any investigational compound within 30 days prior to Screening. 3. If female, the participant is pregnant or lactating or intending to become pregnant before, during, or within 1 month after participating in this study; or intending to donate ova during such time period. 4. Has a history of drug abuse or recent (within the last 12 months) history of excessive alcohol consumption defined as >2 drinks/day (>90 ml of 80 proof alcohol or equivalent). 5. Has mild, moderate, severe liver impairment. 6. Is an immediate family member, study site employee, or is in a dependent relationship with a study site employee who is involved in conduct of this study (eg, spouse, parent, child, sibling) or may consent under duress. 7. Takes any concomitant medication including over-the-counter and herbal products for muscle spasms. If a participant is taking such medications, the medications has to be discontinued before starting the study. 8. Takes or took within last 14 days medications, such as: 1. selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs); 2. serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs); 3. tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs); 4. monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibitors; 5. tramadol; 6. bupropion; 7. meperidine; 8. verapamil; 9. non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs); 10. topical anti-inflammatory medications 9. Has a history or clinical manifestations of significant medical condition, such as: 1. hyperthyroidism; 2. acute recovery phase of myocardial infarction; 3. arrhythmias, heart block or conduction disturbances; 4. congestive heart failure; 5. angle-closure glaucoma; 6. urinary retention; 7. increased intraocular pressure. 10. Has abnormal physical findings or a medical condition that might have placed the participant at risk or interfered with the participant's ability to participate in the study. 11. Has any known condition or disorder that might have affected absorption of the study drug. 12. Has a history of hypersensitivity or allergies to cyclobenzaprine and/or tricyclic antidepressants or any of their components. 13. Has a history of hypersensitivity to any NSAIDs including salicylate sensitivity. 14. Has a history of thrombocytopenia. 15. Has a history of gastro-intestinal bleeding, cerebrovascular bleeding or other bleeding disorders. 16. Had active or history of recurrent peptic ulcer/haemorrhage (two or more distinct episodes of proven ulceration or bleeding) 17. Has a history of severe renal impairment 18. Had a major surgery during the 6 months preceding study entry. 19. Has a language barrier or any other problems precluding good communication or cooperation. 20. Has any reason to believe that he/she would not be able to complete the evaluations needed in this study. 21. Has a known history of positive screen for hepatitis B surface antigen, hepatitis C antibody, or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) antibody. 22. Drug abuse in anamnesis. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
n/a |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Takeda |
Russian Federation,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Percentage of Participants With Subject's Rating of Medication Helpfulness Impression on Day 3 of Treatment | Participants assessed the study medication helpfulness on a daily basis (in the daily diary), using the following 5-point rating scale: "How would you rate this study medication in improving your condition?" "0 = poor", "1 = fair", "2 = good", "3 = very good", "4 = excellent". | Day 3 | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Subject's Rating of Medication Helpfulness Impression on Days 7 and 14 of Treatment | Participants assessed the study medication helpfulness on a daily basis (in the daily diary), using the following 5-point rating scale: "How would you rate this study medication in improving your condition?" "0 = poor", "1 = fair", "2 = good", "3 = very good", "4 = excellent". | Days 7 and 14 | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Physician's Clinical Global Assessment on Day 3 of Treatment | The investigator assessed their clinical global impression of change compared to Baseline, based on physical examination, degree of muscle spasm (presence of muscle spasm assessment), reaction to palpation (presence of local pain assessment), limitation of range of motion, and evaluation of the patient's reported functional assessment (limitation of activities of daily living assessment). The following 5-point rating scale was used: "1 = worse", "2 = no change", "3 = slight improvement", "4 = moderate improvement", "5 = marked improvement". | Day 3 | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Physician's Clinical Global Assessment on Days 7 and 15 of Treatment | The investigator assessed their clinical global impression of change compared to Baseline, based on physical examination, degree of muscle spasm (presence of muscle spasm assessment), reaction to palpation (presence of local pain assessment), limitation of range of motion, and evaluation of the patient's reported functional assessment (limitation of activities of daily living assessment). The following 5-point rating scale was used: "1 = worse", "2 = no change", "3 = slight improvement", "4 = moderate improvement", "5 = marked improvement". | Days 7 and 15 | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Subject-Rated Global Impression on Days 3, 7, and 14 of Treatment | Participants assessed their clinical global impression based on relief from local pain, restriction in activities of daily living, restriction of movement and intensity of local pain on a daily basis. The following 5-point rating scale was used: "1 = worse", "2 = no change", "3 = slight improvement", "4 = moderate improvement", "5 = marked improvement". | Days 3, 7, and 14 | |
Secondary | Percentage of Responders on Days 3, 7, and 14 of Treatment | A responder was defined as a participant who had both a rating of either "very good" or "excellent" for the participant's rating of medication helpfulness. | Days 3, 7, and 14 | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Presence of Muscle Spasm on Days 3, 7, and 15 of Treatment | The investigator assessment based on physical examination, presence of muscle spasm (presence of muscle spasm assessment). The following 5-point rating scale was used: "1 = none", "2 = mild", "3 = moderate", "4 = moderately severe", "5 = severe". | Days 3, 7, and 15 | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Presence of Local Pain on Days 3, 7, and 15 of Treatment | The investigator assessed local pain based on physical examination, reaction to palpation (presence of local pain assessment). The following 5-point rating scale was used: "1 = none", "2 = mild", "3 = moderate", "4 = moderately severe", "5 = severe". | Days 3, 7, and 15 | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Limitation of Range of Motion on Days 3, 7, and 15 of Treatment | The investigator assessed limitation of range of motion. The following 5-point rating scale was used: "1 = none", "2 = mild", "3 = moderate", "4 = moderately severe", "5 = severe". | Days 3, 7, and 15 | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Limitation of Activities of Daily Living on Days 3, 7, and 15 of Treatment | The investigator assessed limitation of activities based on evaluation of the patient's reported functional assessment. The following 5-point rating scale was used: "1 = none", "2 = mild", "3 = moderate", "4 = moderately severe", "5 = severe". | Days 3, 7, and 15 |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT05293847 -
Postural Based Telerehabilitation in Mechanic Neck Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04060004 -
The Effects of Dry Needling on the Superficial Neck Musculature
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06204627 -
TDCS* and Laterality Trainnning in Patients With Chronic Neck Pain
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05870371 -
The Effect of the Feldenkrais Method on Pain and Function in Patients With Chronic Neck Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06049316 -
Scapular Stabilization vs Functional Exercises on Chronic Neck Pain
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05944354 -
Wearable Spine Health System for Military Readiness
|
||
Completed |
NCT02882061 -
Examination of Cervical Thoracic Differentiation Testing in Individuals With Neck Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02731014 -
Dry Needling for Patients With Neck Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03147508 -
Investigating Clinical Indicators of Spine Related Dysfunction Patterns. A Clinical Study on Neck Pain Patients.
|
||
Completed |
NCT02904668 -
Self-management Program in Chronic Neck Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02638987 -
EMG Activity Before, During and After Dry Needling
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT02843269 -
Multiple-component Workplace FRamed Intervention to Decrease Occupational Muscle Pain - FRIDOM
|
N/A | |
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT02485795 -
Observational Study of the Impact of Genetic Testing on Healthcare Decisions and Care in Interventional Pain Management
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02225873 -
The Effectiveness of Exercises Protocol in Management of Neck Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02235207 -
Effectiveness of Fustra—Exercise Program in Neck and Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02245425 -
Comparison of Two Thoracic Manipulation Techniques to Improve Neck Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02190890 -
Dry Needling Dosage in the Treatment of Myofascial Neck Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02051478 -
Thoracic Manipulation and Mobilization for Neck Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01938209 -
A Comparison of Seated Thoracic Manipulation and Targeted Supine Thoracic Manipulation on Cervical Flexion Motion and Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01233180 -
Effects of Gua Sha and Thermotherapy on Chronic Neck Pain
|
N/A |