Neck Dissection Clinical Trial
Official title:
Harmonic Scalpel vs. Electrocautery in Modified Radical Neck Dissection: A Single Blinded Prospective Randomized Trial
Verified date | April 2009 |
Source | University of Calgary |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | Canada: Ethics Review Committee |
Study type | Interventional |
Neck dissection is the main technique used by head and neck surgeons to treat known or
suspected metastatic cancer to the neck. The traditional radical neck dissection was
effective at treating metastatic cancer to the neck however the downside to this technique
was significant morbidity. Since the early 1960's there has been several proposed techniques
to treat metastatic head and neck cancer that involves preserving important anatomical
structures in the neck. The disadvantage to these techniques are that they require
meticulous dissection and can lead to bleeding and an increase in operative time. One
particular tool that has been proposed in other surgical subspecialties, including head and
neck surgery, is the harmonic scalpel. Using this tool, tissue dissection and vessel
occlusion at the same time can occur with a reduced thermal damage to the surrounding tissue
when compared to traditional cautery. In this study, our purpose is to determine if the
harmonic scalpel will lead to a decrease in blood loss and operative time in patients
undergoing a modified radical neck dissection compared to electrocautery.
Hypothesis: Use of the harmonic scalpel as a surgical adjunct will reduce operative time for
neck dissection and will reduce intraoperative blood loss.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 34 |
Est. completion date | December 2010 |
Est. primary completion date | September 2010 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | Both |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - age > 18 years - undergoing neck dissection (levels I-IV) Exclusion Criteria: - no prior head and neck surgery - no prior head and neck cancer - no prior head and neck radiation |
Allocation: Randomized, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Treatment
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Canada | Foothills Medical Centre | Calgary | Alberta |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
University of Calgary |
Canada,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | operative blood loss | intraoperative | No | |
Primary | Operating Time | at end of the procedure | No | |
Secondary | wound drainage | 48 hours | No | |
Secondary | wound infection | 48 hours, 1 week | No |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Withdrawn |
NCT03971760 -
Ideal Drainage Output of Post-operative Neck Suction Drain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03532581 -
Indocyanine Green Lymphangiography in Identifying Thoracic Duct During Neck Surgery
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05806073 -
Elective vs Therapeutic Neck Dissection in Treatment of Patients With Clinical T1/2N1M0 Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma
|
N/A |