Scopolamine Patch and Acupressure Point P6 Stimulation for Reduction of Nausea and Vomiting During Cesarean Section

Nausea Clinical Trial

Official title:

Is the Application of Scopolamine Patch With or Without Intra-operative Acupressure Point P6 Stimulation More Effective Than Intra-operative Acupressure Point P6 Stimulation Alone?

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT02960113
• Other study ID #: Pro20160000234
• Status: Completed
• Phase: Phase 4
• Start date: May 2016
• Est. completion date: September 2021

Study information

• Verified date: November 2022
• Source: Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of reducing intra-cesarean section nausea and vomiting with regional anesthesia in subjects who will receive scopolamine patch with acupressure point P6 stimulation versus subjects that receive just scopolamine patch versus subjects that receive just acupressure point P6 stimulation.

Description:

Nausea and vomiting are very common and unpleasant events experienced during cesarean section under regional anesthesia and in the postoperative period following cesarean section. These side effects are distressing for both the parturient and her family. In addition, intraoperative vomiting causes significant challenges for the surgeon, such as increased procedure length, increased risk of bleeding, increased risk of gastric content aspiration, and potential surgical trauma.

To combat the nausea and vomiting seen in all above anesthetic modalities, but to a greater degree in regional anesthesia, a number of pharmacological interventions are currently used with varying degrees of effectiveness in the perioperative period. These medications come from a wide range of drug classes including serotonin and dopamine receptor antagonists, corticosteroids, antihistamines, sedatives and anticholinergics.

In our study, we would like to compare the effectiveness of antiemetic agents or technique which cause less severe adverse reactions to the mother and her fetus. Out of the available pharmacological agents for reduction of intra-cesarean section nausea and vomiting, transdermal scopolamine patch is one of the safest medications. We would like to compare the effectiveness of the transdermal scopolamine patch with acupressure point P6 stimulation versus just transdermal scopolamine patch versus just acupressure point P6 stimulation.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 240
• Est. completion date: September 2021
• Est. primary completion date: September 2021
• Accepts healthy volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers
• Gender: Female
• Age group: 18 Years to 45 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Female subjects ages 18 to 45

2. Subjects with ASA Class I or II

3. Subjects with elective primary or repeat cesarean delivery

4. Subjects who receive spinal and/or epidural anesthesia

5. English and non-English speaking subjects will be included in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Female subjects <18 years of age

2. Subjects requiring emergent cesarean delivery

3. Gestational age < 37 weeks

4. History of placenta accreta

5. Multiple gestation pregnancy

6. ASA status III or higher

7. Current history of pregnancy induced hypertension, pre-eclampsia, or eclampsia

8. History of any chronic medication use (other than prenatal vitamins), including inhaler medications

9. Current urinary tract infection, pneumonia, or otitis media

10. Coagulopathies or skin infections overlying the spine

11. History of open angle glaucoma, seizures or psychosis

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Nausea
• Satisfaction
• Vomiting

Intervention

Drug:
• scopolamine patch
Group I (n=80): Will receive scopolamine patch placement on the skin behind the right ear 1 hour before initiation of the regional anesthesia for the duration of surgery. The time of the application of the patch will be recorded, and the time of the start of the surgery will be recorded. The last time point for evaluation of patient's nausea/vomiting will be when the patient arrives to the post anesthesia care unit. A member of the research team will remove the patch from the patient and properly dispose the patch upon arrival to the post anesthesia care unit.

Device:
• acupressure point P6
Group II (n=80): Will receive acupressure point P6 stimulation. This is a stimulation of the chi channel at the master of the heart (MH8 position) at the small depression of the volar surface of the distal right forearm just above the crest of the wrist. The device will be put on the patients in the operating room prior to administration of the regional anesthesia and will be removed after the cesarean section is complete. The device will be removed from the patient in the operating room, before the patient is transported to the recovery room. Patients will receive continuous stimulation at a level that is comfortable for her prior to administration of the standardized regional anesthesia.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
United States	Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital	New Brunswick	New Jersey

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (15)

Afolabi BB, Lesi FE. Regional versus general anaesthesia for caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Oct 17;10:CD004350. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004350.pub3. — View Citation

Allen TK, Habib AS. P6 stimulation for the prevention of nausea and vomiting associated with cesarean delivery under neuraxial anesthesia: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Anesth Analg. 2008 Oct;107(4):1308-12. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31816d1864. — View Citation

Apfel CC, Zhang K, George E, Shi S, Jalota L, Hornuss C, Fero KE, Heidrich F, Pergolizzi JV, Cakmakkaya OS, Kranke P. Transdermal scopolamine for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Ther. 2010 Nov;32(12):1987-2002. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2010.11.014. Erratum In: Clin Ther. 2010 Dec;32(14):2502. — View Citation

Balki M, Carvalho JC. Intraoperative nausea and vomiting during cesarean section under regional anesthesia. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2005 Jul;14(3):230-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2004.12.004. — View Citation

Belluomini J, Litt RC, Lee KA, Katz M. Acupressure for nausea and vomiting of pregnancy: a randomized, blinded study. Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Aug;84(2):245-8. — View Citation

Ezri T, Szmuk P, Evron S, Geva D, Hagay Z, Katz J. Difficult airway in obstetric anesthesia: a review. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2001 Oct;56(10):631-41. doi: 10.1097/00006254-200110000-00022. — View Citation

Flake ZA, Linn BS, Hornecker JR. Practical selection of antiemetics in the ambulatory setting. Am Fam Physician. 2015 Mar 1;91(5):293-6. — View Citation

Golembiewski J, Chernin E, Chopra T. Prevention and treatment of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2005 Jun 15;62(12):1247-60; quiz 1261-2. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/62.12.1247. — View Citation

Hawkins JL, Koonin LM, Palmer SK, Gibbs CP. Anesthesia-related deaths during obstetric delivery in the United States, 1979-1990. Anesthesiology. 1997 Feb;86(2):277-84. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199702000-00002. — View Citation

Lee A, Fan LT. Stimulation of the wrist acupuncture point P6 for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Apr 15;(2):CD003281. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003281.pub3. — View Citation

Malvasi A, Tinelli A, Stark M, Pontrelli G, Brizzi A, Wetzl RG, Benhamou D. Low-dose sequential combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia in elective Stark caesarean section: a preliminary cohort study. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2010 Mar;14(3):215-21. — View Citation

Paranjothy S, Griffiths JD, Broughton HK, Gyte GM, Brown HC, Thomas J. Interventions at caesarean section for reducing the risk of aspiration pneumonitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Feb 5;(2):CD004943. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004943.pub4. — View Citation

Quinla JD, Hill DA. Nausea and vomiting of pregnancy. Am Fam Physician. 2003 Jul 1;68(1):121-8. — View Citation

Renner UD, Oertel R, Kirch W. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in clinical use of scopolamine. Ther Drug Monit. 2005 Oct;27(5):655-65. doi: 10.1097/01.ftd.0000168293.48226.57. — View Citation

Riley ET, Cohen SE, Macario A, Desai JB, Ratner EF. Spinal versus epidural anesthesia for cesarean section: a comparison of time efficiency, costs, charges, and complications. Anesth Analg. 1995 Apr;80(4):709-12. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199504000-00010. — View Citation

* Note: There are 15 references in all — Click here to view all references

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Number of Patients With Nausea	The investigators will analyze if there is a statistically significant difference between the number of patients that experience nausea at any point during the surgical procedure in each group.	Throughout the entire surgical procedure
Primary	Number of Patients With Vomiting	The investigators will perform objective assessments of whether or not the patients have vomited during the procedure. The investigators will then analyze if there is a statistically significant difference between the number of patients that vomit in each group.	Throughout the surgical procedure
Secondary	Satisfaction With Intraoperative Antiemetic Treatment	Patients are asked their nausea and vomiting treatment satisfaction (0 = Not Satisfied, 10 = Extremely Satisfied). Patients are also asked their overall satisfaction with the procedure (0 = Not Satisfied, 10 = Extremely Satisfied).	Throughout the surgical procedure
Secondary	Level of Nausea After the Administration of the Regional Anesthesia Medications	Patients offer their subjective assessments of the level of nausea on a scale of 0-10 (0 = no nausea, 10 = worst nausea ever experienced) after the administration of the regional anesthesia medications. The investigators will analyze if there is a statistically significant difference between the number of patients that experience nausea in each group at this point. Patients that report nausea (1 or more on our scale) will be recorded as that they have experienced nausea.	From administration of anaesthesia until eversion of uterus
Secondary	Level of Nausea After Eversion of the Uterus	Patients offer their subjective assessments of the level of nausea on a scale of 0-10 (0 = no nausea, 10 = worst nausea ever experienced) after eversion of the uterus. The investigators will analyze if there is a statistically significant difference between the number of patients that experience nausea in each group at this point. Patients that report nausea (1 or more on our scale) will be recorded as that they have experienced nausea.	After eversion of the uterus until replacement of the uterus
Secondary	Level of Nausea After Replacement of the Uterus	Patients offer their subjective assessments of the level of nausea on a scale of 0-10 (0 = no nausea, 10 = worst nausea ever experienced) after replacement of the uterus. The investigators will analyze if there is a statistically significant difference between the number of patients that experience nausea in each group at this point. Patients that report nausea (1 or more on our scale) will be recorded as that they have experienced nausea.	After replacement of the uterus and to the next 15 minutes
Secondary	Level of Nausea Upon Arrival to the Post-operative Recovery Room	Patients offer their subjective assessments of the level of nausea on a scale of 0-10 (0 = no nausea, 10 = worst nausea ever experienced) upon arrival to the post-operative recovery room. The investigators will analyze if there is a statistically significant difference between the number of patients that experience nausea in each group at this point. Patients that report nausea (1 or more on our scale) will be recorded as that they have experienced nausea.	15 minutes after replacement of the uterus to arrival at post-anaesthesia care unit
Secondary	Number of Patients With Vomiting After the Administration of the Regional Anesthesia Medications	Objective assessments of whether or not the patients have vomited at this point in the surgical procedure will be done. The investigators will analyze if there is a statistically significant difference between the number of patients that vomit in each group.	After the administration of the regional anesthesia medications until eversion of the uterus
Secondary	Number of Patients With Vomiting After Eversion of the Uterus	Objective assessments of whether or not the patients have vomited at this point in the surgical procedure will be done. The investigators will analyze if there is a statistically significant difference between the number of patients that vomit in each group.	After eversion of to replacement of the uterus
Secondary	Number of Patients With Vomiting After Replacement of the Uterus	Objective assessments of whether or not the patients have vomited at this point in the surgical procedure will be done. The investigators will analyze if there is a statistically significant difference between the number of patients that vomit in each group.	After replacement of the uterus and for next 15 minutes
Secondary	Number of Patients With Vomiting Upon Arrival to the Post-operative Recovery Room	Objective assessments of whether or not the patients have vomited at this point in the surgical procedure will be done. The investigators will analyze if there is a statistically significant difference between the number of patients that vomit in each group.	From 15 minutes after replacement of the uterus until arrival at the post-anaesthesia care unit