View clinical trials related to Nasal Obstruction.
Filter by:Nasal obstruction is a possible complication of rhinoplasty surgery. Several causes can explain it: deviation of the nasal septum, appearance of mucosal flanges inside the nasal cavity, but also collapse of the internal valve by its fragility. All surgeons performing rhinoplasty or rhinoseptoplasty are unfortunately confronted with this. Thus, when a rhinoplasty patient complains of postoperative nasal obstruction, the surgeon routinely performs several explorations: - Inspection of the nasal cavity with a nasofibroscope - Study of the nasal respiratory flows with a rhinomanometer The results of these 2 explorations allow to determine the cause of the obstruction and if it is explained or not by a collapse of the internal valve. When internal valve collapse is the cause of postoperative nasal obstruction, few alternatives exist to treat this problem. Revision surgery under general anesthesia is usually necessary, with placement of a cartilage graft (= spreader graft) in the septo-triangular angle to reopen and support it. An alternative treatment is the injection of hyaluronic acid into the septo-triangular angle instead of the cartilage graft placed in the operating room. This option has several advantages: it is performed during the consultation, no general anesthesia is required, the procedure is quick, the cost is much lower, the patient's nasal breathing improves immediately, and the post-procedure follow-up is simple. The aim of our study is therefore to objectively analyze the modification of nasal biomechanics after injection of hyaluronic acid in the septo-triangular angle in patients with internal nasal valve (post (septo)-rhinoplasty). This objective evaluation will be performed with a rhinomanometer, before and after injection. This is a simple, non-invasive measuring device that allows the measurement of the main physical variables governing the biomechanics of the fluids inside the nasal cavity, such as pressure, flow and therefore nasal resistance. The objective proof of such an efficiency will allow a better management of the patients, to universalize the practices, to decrease the cost of the treatment and eventually to bring arguments to the health authorities for the reimbursement of such procedures.
The mainstay of treatment in viral upper and lower respiratory tract disease is airway clearance. Viral respiratory tract infections account for a substantial amount of emergency department (ED) visits, financial and stress burden on caregivers. In addition, they also account for a large number of ED return visits. While airway clearance is considered a mainstay of treatment the pragmatic effectiveness of various devices remain unstudied in patients who are discharged from the ED. The objectives of this study are to compare the pragmatic effectiveness of two commonly used suction devices the NoseFrida and bulb suction and to provide a descriptive analysis on 72 hour return to ED rates and readmission rates. Patients will be enrolled October 15, 2018 to October 15, 2019 or until NoseFrida supplies are depleted. Fridababy will supply 500 NoseFrida devices and replacement filters. Patients aged 1 day to 24 months presenting Vanderbilt Childrens ED with symptoms of nasal congestion or bronchiolitis who require suctioning and will be discharged from the ED will be approached for enrollment. Exclusion criteria include no upper airway abnormalities or previously enrolled in study. The study design is a prospective and retrospective observational study. We anticipate about 500 patients to be enrolled in this study. Families will then be approached for consent to participate. Caregiver will fill out a data collection form then be instructed on how to use the NoseFrida. Next, family with trial it on their child while in the ED. Caregivers will then fill out a 7 point Likert survey on both the bulb suction and NoseFrida device. The family will go home with this device and a set of replacement filters and instructed to suction their child as needed. The primary investigator (PI) will then complete a 72 hour chart review to determine the number of return to ED visits and readmission rates. To compare ED returns with retrospective data, KSP will conduct a review of the business objects database using ICD9 codes specific for viral respiratory tract infections over the past 3 years to determine a control return ED visit rate. Data will be compared using a paired T-test. If data is not normally distributed we will use a Wilcoxon signed-rank test. We will also use a multivariable logistic model to examine associations adjusted for age and illness severity.
Pain is an unpleasant sensory experience associated with actual or potential tissue damage. Acute pain management is an important aspect of perioperative anesthetic care. Moreover, it is the most important factor related to patient discomfort after surgery. Adequate pain management, ideally resulting in the complete absence of postoperative pain, not only provides comfort to patients, but may also contribute to improved healing and a reduction in the incidence of postoperative complications. Inadequate postoperative analgesia has been shown to contribute to adverse outcomes, including, but not limited to, immunosuppression, hyperglycemia, poor rehabilitation, and progression to chronic pain.
Commercially-available internal nasal stents placed inside the nostril should produce decreased nasal obstruction detectable subjectively (volunteers will fill out a survey) and objectively (degree of obstruction will be measured with a rhinomanometer which measure resistant of airflow while breathing through nose).
This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to document the long-term effect of treatment with mometasone furoate nasal spray in moderate to severe adenoids hypertrophy as reflected by the need for removal of the adenoids within one year of the treatment regimen. Subjects will be assigned treated with either mometasone furoate nasal spray or placebo for 3 months. Subjects will be followed for an addition 12 months. Serious AEs will be followed starting first dose-till 30 days after study treatment period completion. This study was terminated - Please see "P04367 - Lebanon"
Turbinates are large structures in the nasal airway that help the nose to clean and humidify the air we breathe. Inferior turbinates can swell up and block the breathing passage, making it hard to breath. To address this, turbinate size must be reduced. This study looks at two common procedures for turbinate reduction: 1. Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) involves inserting a special needle into the inferior (lower) turbinate that releases thermal energy, which significantly reduces its size. This can be done under local anesthesia at the doctor's office. 2. Partial Resection of Inferior Turbinate (PRIT) involves surgically removing a piece off the turbinate, which also reduces its size. While both procedures improve nasal obstruction, no study has directly compared which is more effective. Eighty patients being treated for septal deformity and turbinate hypertrophy will be randomly chosen for either PRIT or RFA treatment. They will fill out a simple, five question survey that measures how they view their nasal blockage 4 times in one year. We believe that since PRIT permanently removes a part of the turbinate, PRIT patients will report more improvement than RFA patients one year later. We believe that complications (measured by the doctor) will be the same for both treatments.