Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Enrolling by invitation

Administrative data

NCT number NCT03233373
Other study ID # 2017-8248
Secondary ID
Status Enrolling by invitation
Phase
First received
Last updated
Start date September 1, 2017
Est. completion date September 2020

Study information

Verified date September 2018
Source New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

Currently, there are no tools that can measure nasal airflow in an objective manner that is non-invasive to the patient. This clinical study aims to address this by evaluating the use of thermal imaging as a diagnostic tool for measuring nasal airflow.

Proper airflow cools the nasal airway as it passes--obstructions or narrowed airways hinder flow and results in elevated temperatures along the airway and nasal tissue. It is this elevation in temperature, or more specifically, loss of cooling, that we hypothesize to be measurable with thermal imaging. Participants in this study will be asked to perform 3-4 nasal breathing cycles which will be recorded by the thermal imager.


Description:

Currently there's no non-invasive, objective method for measuring nasal airflow. The current standard, the NOSE score is an inaccurate measure of physiology (it is subjective). There is a considerable amount of data that demonstrates that the nasopharyngeal airway is the preferred ventilatory pathway for breathing at rest and during sleep. Finding a reliable measurement modality is important in light of this. The primary goal of this study is to evaluate a novel approach to measuring nasal airflow in thermal imaging. Previous studies show that higher temperatures of the nasal mucosa are related to decreased patency. The investigators hypothesize that reduced or obstructed airflow leads to the loss of the cooling oscillatory cycle present in normal nasal respiration. The investigators believe this diminished or absent cycle may be detectable via thermal imaging due to predicted elevation of mucosal temperatures (or loss of the cooling gradient). Other methods in the past aimed at measuring temperature changes introduced error due to their invasiveness (irritation of the mucosa lead to higher baseline oscillatory cycles). This is no longer an issue as the thermal imager requires no physical contact with the patient to function.

There are several methods for measuring nasal patency that have been described throughout the literature. These include objective measurements such as acoustic rhinometry and rhinomanometry, as well as subjective measurements such as the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test and Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) questionnaires. More recently, snap-on thermal imaging devices that take advantage of the processing power and high resolution of modern phones have surfaced leading to lower costs for highly-sensitive devices that we aim to use for measuring nasal airflow. The non-invasive nature of using thermal devices may lead to more accurate, objective measurements of nasal airflow as a previous study demonstrated that tactile irritation from other devices increase the mucosal temperature impeding measurement. (Bailey et al.). Other studies documented that improved sensation of nasal airflow is associated with cooler mucosal temperatures and that increased patency of the nasal passage is related to lower temperatures as well (and the opposite, decreased patency to increased temperatures). (Willatt et al.) We hypothesize that nasal airflow obstruction (NAO) leads to the loss of the cooling oscillatory cycle present in normal nasal respiration which we can detect via thermal imaging due to predicted elevation of mucosal temperatures.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Enrolling by invitation
Enrollment 40
Est. completion date September 2020
Est. primary completion date August 2020
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- All adult patients presenting to the Jacobi Medical Center otolaryngology clinic

Exclusion Criteria:

- Patients under the age of 18

- Patients who recently used any nasal decongestants the day of measurement

- Patients with an active infection such as sinusitis

- Patients with anatomical abnormalities such a severe septal deviation

Study Design


Intervention

Device:
Seek CompactPro thermal imager
A device with image/video recording capability, it is non-invasive and only relies on infrared emissions from heat sources (the patient).

Locations

Country Name City State
United States Jacobi Medical Center Bronx New York

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (7)

Bailey RS, Casey KP, Pawar SS, Garcia GJ. Correlation of Nasal Mucosal Temperature With Subjective Nasal Patency in Healthy Individuals. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2017 Jan 1;19(1):46-52. doi: 10.1001/jamafacial.2016.1445. — View Citation

Chaaban M, Corey JP. Assessing nasal air flow: options and utility. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2011 Mar;8(1):70-8. doi: 10.1513/pats.201005-034RN. — View Citation

Roblin DG, Eccles R. Normal range for nasal partitioning of airflow determined by nasal spirometry in 100 healthy subjects. Am J Rhinol. 2003 Jul-Aug;17(4):179-83. — View Citation

Tsounis M, Swart KM, Georgalas C, Markou K, Menger DJ. The clinical value of peak nasal inspiratory flow, peak oral inspiratory flow, and the nasal patency index. Laryngoscope. 2014 Dec;124(12):2665-9. doi: 10.1002/lary.24810. Epub 2014 Jul 30. — View Citation

Willatt DJ, Jones AS. The role of the temperature of the nasal lining in the sensation of nasal patency. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1996 Dec;21(6):519-23. — View Citation

Willatt DJ. Continuous infrared thermometry of the nasal mucosa. Rhinology. 1993 Jun;31(2):63-7. — View Citation

Zhao K, Blacker K, Luo Y, Bryant B, Jiang J. Perceiving nasal patency through mucosal cooling rather than air temperature or nasal resistance. PLoS One. 2011;6(10):e24618. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024618. Epub 2011 Oct 13. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Minimum temperature in centigrade of patient's reported better (more patent) and worse (less patent) nasal airway From recorded thermal imaging of nasal respiration cycles of both nostrils (nasal airways) through study completion, an average of 1 year
Secondary Area of cooling of patient's reported better (more patent) and worse (less patent) nasal airway From recorded thermal imaging of nasal respiration cycles of both nostrils (nasal airways) through study completion, an average of 1 year
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Active, not recruiting NCT01960816 - InFlux System for Nasal Breathing Improvement N/A
Recruiting NCT05527652 - Self-Supporting Nasopharyngeal Airway (ssNPA) Treating Upper Airway Obstruction in Hypotonia N/A
Recruiting NCT06163404 - Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of the Spirair Implant N/A
Completed NCT05747014 - Novapak Prospective Observational Clinical Trial
Active, not recruiting NCT04549545 - Vivaer® Procedure for Treatment of Nasal Airway Obstruction Study N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT05446714 - Evaluation of the Effect of Three Types of Rapid Maxillary Expanders (Conventional, Hybrid and MSE) N/A