Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Active, not recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT03313921
Other study ID # NL61478.041.17
Secondary ID
Status Active, not recruiting
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date January 4, 2018
Est. completion date December 2019

Study information

Verified date August 2019
Source UMC Utrecht
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The assessment of the refractive state of the eye is a fundamental and important part of ophthalmic and optometric clinical practice. The development of an unsupervised online subjective refraction method makes a refraction more accessible and can be quite cost-saving.

In this study, the investigators want to validate an online refraction method which was recently created in the Netherlands. The study comprises two different set of participants: Part one contains fifty healthy volunteers, 18-40 years of age, with a refractive error and no other ophthalmic pathology. Part two contains fifty patients with an ophthalmic pathology.

The online refraction outcomes will be compared to a manifest refraction and automated refraction in a cross-sectional study design.


Description:

Uncorrected refractive errors cause significant economic implications in both high and low income countries in terms of the loss of potential productivity (Williams et al. (2015)). The prevalence of uncorrected refractive errors is, despite of the available clinical services, still huge; visual impairment is in 42 percent of the cases the result of an uncorrected refractive error worldwide (Williams et al. (2015)). Even in high income countries, this issue remains prevalent. Therefore, the access to the available clinical services has to be simplified. The development of an online refraction method will make a refraction more accessible for patients and can be cost-saving. Clinicians can easily take an online method to places where it's needed for example in low income countries.

There are several methods to measure a refractive error. The 'golden standard' to prescribe spectacles is a manifest refraction (Thibos, Hong, Bradley & Applegate (2004)). This method was already described by F.C. Donders in 1864 and is performed with trial lenses and a visual acuity chart to measure the refraction error (Donders (1864)). An automated refraction is a quick routine machine based assessment, mainly used as a starting point for a manifest refraction and is based on retinoscopy (Nissman et al., (2004)).

At the moment, several online refraction methods are available. However, these methods are not scientifically validated, unavailable outside the United States of America (USA) or not designed for customers. One of these online refraction methods is Opternative (Opternative (2017)). Opternative is currently used in the USA and is still developing (Opternative (2017)). It's a self-directed online refraction method using a computer-based response to presented stimuli with the use of a smartphone and a computer. Another method is EyeNetra (EyeNetra (2017) & Ohlendorf, Leube & Wahl (2016)). The use of this method is limited due to the need of special equipment such as a portable autorefractor, an autolensometer and a phoropter. Therefore, EyeNetra is mainly designed for optometrists and ophthalmologists for low-income populations. The same applies to SVOne; this method uses a Hartmann-Shack wavefront aberrometer which the user can attach to a smartphone (Ohlendorf, Leube & Wahl (2016)). Other online refraction methods are 6over6, but this method has not been released yet (6over6, (2017)), and Warby Parker (Warby Parker, (2017)).

There are also online visual acuity tests to measure the visual acuity only. The mobile devices to test the visual acuity are PeekVision, 6over6, Opternative, Eyenetra and DigiSight (Ludwig et al., (2016)).

Currently, digitalization is affecting our way of life. Technology can be used to design products to easily determine if someone has a refractive error. This can, in the future, solve a big part of the problem of uncorrected refractive errors and the leading cause of blindness worldwide. The aim of this study is to validate a recently created online refraction method by comparing the outcomes of the online refraction method with the 'golden standard' manifest refraction.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Active, not recruiting
Enrollment 150
Est. completion date December 2019
Est. primary completion date July 24, 2019
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender All
Age group 18 Years to 40 Years
Eligibility inclusion criteria:

1. Group one:

- Age: 18-40 years

- Master the Dutch language

- Capable to perform the tests adequately.

2. Group two:

- Age: 18-40 years

- Master the Dutch language

- Capable to perform the tests adequately.

- Diagnosis of keratoconus.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Group one:

- No informed consent

- Diabetes

- Pregnancy or lactation

- High hyperopia/myopia (>6D)

- An ophthalmic history besides ametropia

2. Group two:

- No informed consent

- Diabetes

- Pregnancy or lactation

- High hyperopia/myopia (>6D)

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Diagnostic Test:
Online Manifest Refraction
The online manifest refraction is performed with a web-based application and consists of an assessment of visual acuity, an assessment of spherical refractive error, and an assessment of cylinder refractive error. The software is a class 1 CE-approved medical device. The automated refraction is measured with a regular office-based autorefractor device; TOPCON RM-8000.

Locations

Country Name City State
Netherlands University Medical Center Utrecht Utrecht

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
UMC Utrecht

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Netherlands, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Refractive error The refractive error is recorded in a Sphere power (D), a Cylinder power (D) and a Cylinder axis (°). These are converted into vectors by Fourier analysis. All three measurements (automated refraction, manifest refraction and online refraction) will be performed subsequently on the same 1 day. Data collection will take place between november 2017 and january 2018. No follow up measurements are required.
Secondary Maximum distance visual acuity The maximum visual acuity as assessed during the refraction procedure using an ETDRS visual acuity chart and converted into logMAR values. The visual acuity test will take place on the same 1 day as the other measurements. Data collection will take place between november 2017 and january 2018. No follow up measurements are required.
Secondary Participant satisfaction Questionnaire on user experience of the smartphone application. The questionnaire will be filled in on the same 1 day as the other measurements. Data collecting will take place between november 2017 and january 2018. No follow up measurements are required.
Secondary Telemetry Duration of the online test time Measurements of the duration of the online test will happen 1 day during the online refraction test. Collecting data will take place between November 2017 and January 2018. No follow up measurements are required.
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT04923841 - Myopia Control Using Bright Light Therapy, Myopic Defocus and Atropine N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT04080128 - Examination of Myopia Progression and Soft Bifocal Contact Lens Myopia Control N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT05275959 - Beijing (Peking)---Myopia and Obesity Comorbidity Intervention (BMOCI) N/A
Completed NCT04604405 - Effects of 650nm Low Energy Light on Human Retina and Choroid Microcirculation N/A
Recruiting NCT05594719 - The Effect of Sun-like Spectrum With Different Spectrum Composition on Retinal Blood Flow N/A
Completed NCT05594732 - The Effects of Different Outdoor Light Exposure Modes on Retinal Blood Flow N/A
Completed NCT04492397 - Comparing The Performance Of Two Different Daily Disposable Lenses (MIKI) N/A
Completed NCT04536571 - Vision Stability and Preference for Soft Toric vs. Soft Spherical Contact Lenses N/A
Completed NCT06046209 - Comparing a Monthly Replacement Lens Versus a Daily Disposable Lens N/A
Recruiting NCT06344572 - Pivotal Study of SAT-001 in Treatment of Pediatric Patient With Myopia Phase 3
Recruiting NCT05611294 - Contralateral Study of Topography Guided LASIK Versus Small Incision Lenticule Extraction N/A
Completed NCT05656885 - Clinical Evaluation of Two Frequent Replacement Soft Spherical Contact Lenses N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT05534022 - Clinical Evaluation of a Myopia Control Lens in Slowing Myopia Progression. N/A
Completed NCT03934788 - the Clinical Performance of the Oxysoft Daily Disposable Silicone Hydrogel Soft Contact Lens N/A
Completed NCT03701516 - Clinical Evaluation of Etafilcon A Contact Lenses Using a Novel Molding Process 2 N/A
Completed NCT05538754 - Post-Market Evaluation of the EVO ICL N/A
Completed NCT03139201 - Clinical Performance of the OxyAqua Daily Disposable Silicone Hydrogel Soft Contact Lens N/A
Completed NCT02555722 - Evaluation of the CooperVision, Inc. Fanfilcon A and Enfilcon A Daily Wear Contact Lenses When Used for Frequent Replacement for up to One (1) Month of Daily Wear N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06009458 - Acuity 200™ (Fluoroxyfocon A) Orthokeratology Contact Lens for Overnight Wear N/A
Recruiting NCT05548478 - Corneal Endothelial Cell Injury Induced by Mitomycin-C N/A