Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT05811286
Other study ID # S64797
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date May 20, 2021
Est. completion date June 28, 2023

Study information

Verified date February 2023
Source Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Polyps, intracavitary myomas and retained products of conception (RPOC) are common benign intracavitary lesions of the uterus and frequently cause abnormal uterine bleeding or pain. In general, intracavitary lesions are treated by operative hysteroscopy with bipolar resectoscopic removal under general anaesthesia, performed in the theatre (OR). Potential problems with this approach are thermal damage and impairment of visibility due to loose tissue fragments necessitating multiple entries for tissue removal. Recently, lesion morcellation by hysteroscopy has been introduced as an alternative technique. Compared to the resectoscopic approach, morcellation is reportedly associated with a shorter total procedure time, smaller fluid deficit and number of insertions. A few trials also registered a higher success rate in completeness of resection. No significant differences in odds of surgical complications have been reported. Most hysteroscopic morcellators have diameters up to 8 mm, for which cervical dilation under general anaesthesia is usually needed. Recently, companies have developed hysteroscopic morcellators with smaller diameters, e.g. 6.3 mm for the 19 Fr. intrauterine BIGATTI Shaver (IBS®). This means less need for cervical dilation, and potential use without anesthesia. At this moment, there are no prospective studies available on feasibility of the 19 Fr. intrauterine BIGATTI Shaver (IBS®). Before implementing hysteroscopic morcellation in our department, we need a feasibility study assessing the method in standard conditions in the operation room or in ambulatory setting under sedation. Trial objectives: Assessment of the feasibility of hysteroscopic morcellation of benign uterine intracavitary lesions. The primary objective is to assess the completeness of hysteroscopic resection in patients undergoing the procedure under general anesthesia or sedation. Secondary objectives are to assess perioperative parameters as operation time, need for cervical dilation, adverse events, pain, operator satisfaction; to assess quality of tissue for histological examination; to assess postoperative complications and pain.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 56
Est. completion date June 28, 2023
Est. primary completion date June 28, 2023
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender Female
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Patients: - Female Ultrasonographic diagnosis of an intracavitary lesion, according the IETA terms and definitions - endometrial polyp - FIGO 0-1 myoma (maximum diameter 2 cm) - RPOC (maximum diameter 2 cm, no enhanced myometrial vascularity) Exclusion Criteria: - • Active vaginal bleeding - (possible) malignancy - < 18y - Patient refusal - Pregnancy - Impossibility to access the uterine cavity (e.g. severe cervical stenosis) - Absence of intracavitary lesion (endometrial polyp, FIGO 0-1 myoma or RPOC) at hysteroscopy

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Procedure:
Hysteroscopic morcellation 19 Fr. intrauterine BIGATTI Shaver for uterine intracavitary lesions
With the shaver, the lesion is removed in the OR. We will include endometrial polyps, FIGO 0-1 myomas and retained products of conception. We will assess the completeness of hysteroscopic resection, operation time, need for cervical dilation, adverse events, pain, operator satisfaction; quality of tissue for histological examination, postoperative complications and pain.

Locations

Country Name City State
Belgium Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg Genk
Belgium University Hospitals Leuven Leuven

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Belgium, 

References & Publications (13)

AlHilli MM, Nixon KE, Hopkins MR, Weaver AL, Laughlin-Tommaso SK, Famuyide AO. Long-term outcomes after intrauterine morcellation vs hysteroscopic resection of endometrial polyps. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013 Mar-Apr;20(2):215-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2012.10.013. Epub 2013 Jan 5. — View Citation

Ansari SH, Bigatti G, Aghssa MM. Operative hysteroscopy with the Bigatti shaver (IBS (R)) for the removal of placental remnants. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2018 Sep;10(3):153-159. — View Citation

Bigatti G, Ansari SH, Di W. The 19 Fr. Intrauterine Bigatti Shaver (IBS(R)): a clinical and technical update. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2018 Sep;10(3):161-164. — View Citation

Haber K, Hawkins E, Levie M, Chudnoff S. Hysteroscopic morcellation: review of the manufacturer and user facility device experience (MAUDE) database. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015 Jan;22(1):110-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.08.008. Epub 2014 Aug 14. — View Citation

Lee MM, Matsuzono T. Hysteroscopic intrauterine morcellation of submucosal fibroids: preliminary results in Hong Kong and comparisons with conventional hysteroscopic monopolar loop resection. Hong Kong Med J. 2016 Feb;22(1):56-61. doi: 10.12809/hkmj154600. Epub 2016 Jan 8. — View Citation

Li C, Dai Z, Gong Y, Xie B, Wang B. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing hysteroscopic morcellation with resectoscopy for patients with endometrial lesions. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2017 Jan;136(1):6-12. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12012. Epub 2016 Nov 7. — View Citation

Munro MG, Christianson LA. Complications of Hysteroscopic and Uterine Resectoscopic Surgery. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Dec;58(4):765-97. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000146. — View Citation

Pakrashi T. New hysteroscopic techniques for submucosal uterine fibroids. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Aug;26(4):308-13. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000076. — View Citation

Shazly SA, Laughlin-Tommaso SK, Breitkopf DM, Hopkins MR, Burnett TL, Green IC, Farrell AM, Murad MH, Famuyide AO. Hysteroscopic Morcellation Versus Resection for the Treatment of Uterine Cavitary Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016 Sep-Oct;23(6):867-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.04.013. Epub 2016 May 7. — View Citation

Stoll F, Lecointre L, Meyer N, Faller E, Host A, Hummel M, Boisrame T, Akladios C, Garbin O. Randomized Study Comparing a Reusable Morcellator with a Resectoscope in the Hysteroscopic Treatment of Uterine Polyps: The RESMO Study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021 Apr;28(4):801-810. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.07.007. Epub 2020 Jul 16. — View Citation

Thubert T, Foulot H, Vinchant M, Santulli P, Marzouk P, Borghese B, Chapron C. Surgical treatment: Myomectomy and hysterectomy; Endoscopy: A major advancement. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2016 Jul;34:104-21. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2015.11.021. Epub 2016 Jun 22. — View Citation

van Dongen H, Emanuel MH, Wolterbeek R, Trimbos JB, Jansen FW. Hysteroscopic morcellator for removal of intrauterine polyps and myomas: a randomized controlled pilot study among residents in training. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008 Jul-Aug;15(4):466-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2008.02.002. Epub 2008 Apr 18. — View Citation

Vidal-Mazo C, Forero-Diaz C, Lopez-Gonzalez E, Yera-Gilabert M, Machancoses FH. Clinical recurrence of submucosal myoma after a mechanical hysteroscopic myomectomy: Review after 5 years follow up. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019 Dec;243:41-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.10.014. Epub 2019 Oct 21. — View Citation

* Note: There are 13 references in allClick here to view all references

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Completeness of resection of intracavitary lesions in 50 patients, when using a hysteroscopic Bigatti Shaver. If all tissue could be removed by the 19 Fr. intrauterine BIGATTI Shaver by direct visualisation at the end of the hysteroscopic procedure and at post-operative ultrasound evaluation. During surgery
Secondary Operation time total operation time and time necessary for the morcellation During surgery
Secondary Need for cervical dilation during procedure Was it necessary to perform any dilatation with During surgery
Secondary Volume of distension fluid used / loss (deficit) during procedure Deficit in fluid used during surgery? During surgery
Secondary Operator satisfaction, assessed by verbal rating scale Operator satisfaction in terms of technique, ergonomics and general proceedings.
The verbal rating scale includes Very negative; Negative; Intermediate; Positive; Very positive.
At the end of the procedure
Secondary Complications Adverse events during procedure/hospitalization and within the first 6 weeks after procedure 6 weeks after surgery
Secondary Pain on the first postoperative day, assessed by verbal rating scale Pain on the first day post-operatively. The verbal rating scale includes Very negative; Negative; Intermediate; Positive; Very positive. Day 1 post-operatively
Secondary Histology of the intracavitary lesion Incidence of histological outcomes such as endometrial polyps, intracavitary myomas or remnant products of conception.
This is a categorical variable.
6 weeks post-operatively
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT04519593 - ABSOLUTELY: A Temporary Uterine Blood Supply Occlusion for Laparoscopic Myomectomy in Patients With UTErine LeiomYoma N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT06114758 - Comparison Effectiveness of Rectal Misoprostol & Intravenous Tranexamic Acid Reducing Hemorrhage in Myomectomy
Not yet recruiting NCT05932082 - The Impact of Myomectomy on IVF Outcomes N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT05967936 - Paracervical Block Versus Transcervical Block in Outpatient Procedural Hysteroscopy N/A
Recruiting NCT04748978 - OPPIuM Technique and Myolysis With Diode Laser Dwls N/A
Recruiting NCT05271981 - Fertility After Uterine Artery Embolization
Completed NCT05025410 - Remimazolam and Remifentanil Without Neuromuscular Blocking Agent
Recruiting NCT03483142 - the Effect of Misoprostol on Intra-operative Blood Loss During Myomectomy Operation Phase 3
Completed NCT03533907 - Pregnancy Outcomes in Infertile Patients After Treatment With Ulipristal Acetate.
Not yet recruiting NCT03570879 - Laparoscopic Myomectomy With Morcellation or Transvaginal Extraction of Surgical Specimens.
Not yet recruiting NCT04364581 - Endometrial Preparation by Short Course of Letrozole Before Hysteroscopic Removal of Endocavitary Lesions Phase 4
Recruiting NCT06067971 - Evaluation of the Feasibility of Using Augmented Reality in Laparoscopic Surgery, by a Clinical Study During Gynecological Laparoscopic Surgical Procedures. (ENDORA2) N/A
Recruiting NCT04990076 - Ultrasound Evaluation of the Myometrium Using the MUSA Terminology Comparison With Histology
Recruiting NCT06325501 - Misoprostol Versus Oxytocin Infusion On Reducing Blood Loss During Abdominal Myomectomy Phase 3
Completed NCT05761418 - Preoperative Vaginal Dinoprostone Versus Misoprostone in Abdominal Myomectomy Phase 3
Recruiting NCT04311073 - Prophylactic Tranexamic Acid During Minimally Invasive Myomectomies Phase 3
Active, not recruiting NCT05930769 - Retrospective Study on the Evaluation of the Impact of Augmented Reality Usage in Gynecological Laparoscopy on Patients Operated Between 2017 and 2021 (ImpactRA)
Recruiting NCT03550703 - Open Label Immunotherapy of Myoma Phase 2
Completed NCT04482959 - Intraoperative Carbetocin to Decrease Blood Loss During Hysteroscopic Myomectomy Phase 4
Not yet recruiting NCT04030273 - Prevalence of Intrauterine Adhesions After Abdominal Myomectomy