Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

In a recent analysis of a large transfusion database (Transfusion Research Utilization, Surveillance and Tracking database [TRUST]), the investigators found that the transfusion of ABO non-identical RBCs to group A individual was associated with an increased risk of death in-hospital compared to patients transfused with ABO identical RBCs (Red Blood Cells). Our finding was corroborated in a separate study of low birth weight neonates who received only group O RBCs (e.g., group O neonates received ABO identical RBCs but group A, B, and AB neonates received ABO non-identical RBCs). A subgroup of neonates who received ABO non-identical transfusions had higher mortality (Z. Sohl, personal communication, April 30th, 2020). Similar adverse clinical outcomes have been reported in a number of studies where patients have received ABO non-identical RBCs and/or platelets. Together, these findings raise the concern that the longstanding policy of transfusing group O non-identical RBCs and platelets may increase the risk of harm for some patients. In Hamilton, Ontario hospitals, approximately 20% of transfused patients receive ABO non-identical RBCs every year because of inventory shortages, urgent requests, and specific phenotype requirements. The negative impact of this practice could have widespread national and international implications for transfusion policy. The ability to undertake critical exploratory analyses in transfusion medicine is enabled by large research and administrative data sets that include all Hamilton hospitals. The initial finding of potential harm with ABO non-identical RBCs is hypothesis-generating and requires confirmation through external datasets and translational studies to support a biological mechanism. If confirmed, this hypothesis can then be tested in a clinical trial.


Clinical Trial Description

Why ABO non-identical RBCs may cause harm: In addition to the two exploratory studies published by our group (Z. Sohl, personal communication, April 30th, 2020), other investigators have also suggested that ABO non-identical transfusions could be harmful. A retrospective study by Heal et al., evaluated the effects of a policy change to provide only ABO identical RBCs and platelets for patients undergoing stem cell transplantation and patients receiving treatment for hematological malignancies. A historical control group was used for comparison. The ABO identical policy resulted in less bleeding (5% vs. 15-20%) and improved survival. Other retrospective studies have also shown ABO non-identical platelet transfusions to be associated with an increased risk of platelet refractoriness and that refractory patients had circulating immune complexes for several days. Post transfusion platelet count increments were also higher when ABO identical platelets were transfused. In a retrospective study of 153 patients undergoing primary coronary artery bypass graft or coronary valve replacement surgery, the transfusion of at least one ABO non-identical platelet pool was associated with an increased hospital stay, more days with fever, and more RBC transfusions. Other outcomes (mortality in hospital, length of stay in the intensive care unit, antibiotic days, and a total number of platelet transfusions) were not statistically different. A subgroup analysis (n=139) of patients who received at least two platelet pools showed a non-significant trend towards increased morbidity and mortality (8.6% vs. 1.9%; p=0.10) in recipients of ABO-matched platelets. A retrospective study by Lapierre et al. analyzed data from 186 consecutive children with neuroblastoma or brain tumors who were treated with high-dose chemotherapy followed by hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The primary endpoint was hepatic veno-occlusive disease. In their multivariate analysis, two factors significantly increased the risk of this outcome: transfusion of platelet concentrates containing ABO-incompatible plasma and use of melphalan in the conditioning regimen. They concluded that transfusion of platelet concentrates containing ABO-incompatible plasma increases the risk of hepatic veno-occlusive disease and hypothesized that passive antibody binding to A and/or B antigens expressed on the surface of hepatic endothelial cells could be involved in the pathophysiology. It is important to emphasize that a publication bias probably exists in this literature with primarily positive studies being reported, and most of the studies are observational (lower quality evidence). Many of the platelet studies also included both minor incompatibilities (plasma in the platelet product has ABO antibodies that react with the recipient's RBCs) and major incompatibilities (recipient's plasma has ABO antibodies that react with ABO antigens on the transfused platelets); however, this literature combined with our preliminary exploratory analyses (Z. Sohl, personal communication, April 30th, 2020) raises the hypothesis that ABO non-identical transfusions (whether minor or major) could impact patient outcomes and should be further explored. Possible biological mechanism: The concept of transfusion-related immune modulation (TRIM) was defined over 30 years ago. More recent evidence suggests that biological mechanisms leading to TRIM can be the heterogeneous involving donor, product, and/or patient factors that contribute to patient morbidities and mortality. A conceptual framework for two possible mechanisms that could lead to harm post-transfusion are a proinflammatory pathway and an immunosuppression pathway. For both pathways, inflammation is one of the prime targets that contribute to the adverse events seen in recipients. In this study, the investigators will use biomarkers of inflammation to determine if the differences are seen between patients who receive ABO identical RBC or platelet transfusions compared to those receiving ABO non-identical blood products. The investigators hypothesize that passive anti-A and anti-B (from group O donors) can bind to recipients' endothelial cells or soluble antigen causing circulating immune complexes that can signal cytokine generation and release causing a "cytokine storm". The severity of the storm may be tempered or enhanced by the secretor status of the recipient and possibly the donor, the titre of the passive antibody transfused, and Group A or AB recipients' subgroup status (A1/A2). Antibody incompatibility could also lead to small amounts of hemolysis, which could trigger an inflammatory response. The biomarkers frequently used to detect inflammation include interleukin-6 (IL-6); tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α); interleukin-8 (IL-8) and interleukin-1 beta (IL-1β); CD40 Ligand and, C-reactive protein (CRP). Markers of hemolysis in patients post-transfusion include bilirubin, haptoglobin, and lactate dehydrogenase. The investigators will also measure circulating immune complexes as these have been linked to inflammation and a serological profile of the donor/product and the patient will also be performed. A complete list of biomarkers is included below. summary of testing to be performed at various time points during each transfusion episode: Patient Tests: 1. C-Reactive Protein 2. Circulating Immune Complexes 3. IL-6 4. IL-1β 5. TNF-α 6. IL-8 7. CD40 Ligand 8. Complete Blood Count 9. Bilirubin 10. Lactose Dehydrogenase 11. Haptoglobin 12. Anti-A titre (for A and AB group) 13. Anti-B titre (for B and AB group) 14. A1 Phenotyping 15. Lewis Phenotyping Product Tests: 1. Anti-A titre (for A and AB group) 2. Anti-B titre (for B and AB group) 3. A1 Phenotyping 4. Lewis Phenotyping Patients tests will be done at baseline (right before the transfusion starts), 1 hour after transfusion, and 12-24 hours after transfusion Product tests will be done one time on each RBC unit that will be used in the transfusion episodes. ;


Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT04859218
Study type Interventional
Source McMaster University
Contact
Status Not yet recruiting
Phase N/A
Start date August 1, 2021
Completion date September 1, 2023

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT04022785 - PLX51107 and Azacitidine in Treating Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia or Myelodysplastic Syndrome Phase 1
Completed NCT01200355 - Posaconazole Versus Micafungin for Prophylaxis Against Invasive Fungal Infections During Neutropenia in Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy for Acute Myelogenous Leukemia, Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia or Myelodysplastic Syndrome Phase 4
Recruiting NCT02530463 - Nivolumab and/or Ipilimumab With or Without Azacitidine in Treating Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndrome Phase 2
Completed NCT02057185 - Occupational Status and Hematological Disease
Completed NCT01682226 - Myeloablative Unrelated Donor Cord Blood Transplantation With T-Cell Depleted Haplo-identical Peripheral Blood Stem Cells for Patients With High Risk Hematological Malignancies Phase 2
Active, not recruiting NCT02485535 - Selinexor in Treating Patients With Intermediate- and High-Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia or High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome After Transplant Phase 1
Recruiting NCT03941769 - Recombinant Human Interleukin-7 to Promote T-Cell Recovery After Cord Blood Transplant Phase 1
Completed NCT00001637 - Immunosuppressive Preparation Followed by Blood Cell Transplant for the Treatment of Blood Cancers in Older Adults Phase 2
Recruiting NCT04188678 - Resiliency in Older Adults Undergoing Bone Marrow Transplant N/A
Completed NCT00987480 - Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for the Treatment of Patients With Fanconi Anemia Lacking a Genotypically Identical Donor, Using a Chemotherapy Only Cytoreduction With Busulfan, Cyclophosphamide and Fludarabine Phase 2
Recruiting NCT02356159 - Study of Palifermin (Kepivance) in Persons Undergoing Unrelated Donor Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Phase 1/Phase 2
Recruiting NCT04666025 - SARS-CoV-2 Donor-Recipient Immunity Transfer
Completed NCT02756572 - Early Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Treating Patients With Relapsed or Refractory High-Grade Myeloid Neoplasms Phase 2
Terminated NCT02877082 - Tacrolimus, Bortezomib, & Thymoglobulin in Preventing Low Toxicity GVHD in Donor Blood Stem Cell Transplant Patients Phase 2
Completed NCT02543879 - Study of a Novel BET Inhibitor FT-1101 in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Hematologic Malignancies Phase 1
Completed NCT02262312 - Iron Overload and Transient Elastography in Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndrome Phase 0
Completed NCT02188290 - Transplant-Related Mortality in Patients Undergoing a Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation or an Umbilical Cord Blood Transplantation N/A
Recruiting NCT02330692 - Cohort Study of New Prognostic Factors With Peripheral Blood and Bone Marrow Evaluation at the Time of Diagnosis and Relapse in Myelodysplastic Syndrome
Completed NCT01684150 - A Phase 1, Open-Label, Dose-Escalation & Expanded Cohort, Continuous IV Infusion, Multi-center Study of the Safety, Tolerability,PK & PD of EPZ-5676 in Treatment Relapsed/Refractory Patients With Leukemias Involving Phase 1
Active, not recruiting NCT01462578 - Treatment of Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndrome or Acute Myelocytic Leukemia With an Impending Hematological Relapse With Azacitidine (Vidaza) Phase 2