Myasthenia Gravid Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Randomized Trial of Plasma Exchange vs. IVIG in the Treatment of Myasthenia Gravis
Verified date | August 2010 |
Source | University Health Network, Toronto |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | Canada: Health Canada |
Study type | Interventional |
Immunomodulation is effective in treating patients with myasthenia gravis (MG), but prior
studies have not adequately defined if plasma exchange (PLEX) in superior to intravenous
immunoglobulin (IVIG) in the treatment of myasthenia gravis. This study aimed to determine
if PLEX was superior to IVIG in the treatment of patients with myasthenia gravis.
Patients with MG requiring immunomodulation are randomized to IVIG or PLEX and treated with
a full course of immunomodulation. The quantitative myasthenia gravis score (QMGS) will be
evaluated as the primary efficacy parameter at day 14 to determine if PLEX is superior to
IVIG.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 87 |
Est. completion date | July 2010 |
Est. primary completion date | July 2010 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | Both |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - >18 years old - diagnosis of moderate-severe MG (defined as a Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis Score QMGS >10.5) - worsening weakness requiring a change in therapy judged by a neuromuscular expert Exclusion Criteria: - Worsening weakness secondary to concurrent medications (e.g. Aminoglycosides) - Worsening weakness secondary to infection - Change in corticosteroid dosage in the 2 weeks prior to screening - Other disorders causing weakness or fatigue - Known absolute IgA deficiency (risk of anaphylactic reaction to IVIG) - History of anaphylaxis or severe systemic response to IVIG or albumin - Pregnancy or breastfeeding - Active renal failure precluding volume of IVIG (risk of volume overload with IVIG) as judged by the investigators - Clinically significant cardiac disease precluding IVIG volume as judged by the investigators - Known hyperviscosity or hypercoaguable state (risk of stroke with IVIG) - Known coagulopathy with bleeding - On another current study medication or protocol within 4 weeks of screening - Patients with known refractory status to either IVIG or PLEX - Poorly controlled or severe hypertension (exacerbation by IVIG) - Patient refuses treatment with either IVIG or PLEX - Patient refuses follow-up with electrophysiological studies - Patient unable or unwilling to give informed consent |
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor), Primary Purpose: Treatment
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Canada | University Health Network | Toronto | Ontario |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
University Health Network, Toronto | Grifols Therapeutics Inc. |
Canada,
Zinman L, Ng E, Bril V. IV immunoglobulin in patients with myasthenia gravis: a randomized controlled trial. Neurology. 2007 Mar 13;68(11):837-41. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Change in Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis Score (QMGS) from baseline to day 14 after treatment | QMGS is a validated clinical measure of myasthenia gravis ranging from 0 points (no myasthenic weakness) to a maximum of 39 points, with a defined change of 3.4 units required for clinical significance. | QMGS at day 14, and patients followed to day 60 | No |
Secondary | QMGS Score change at days 21 and 28 from start of treatment. | Change in QMGS with time to see if effect ad day 14 is sustained. | 28 days | No |
Secondary | Post intervention status | Categorical scale of improvement, worsening, or no change for myasthenia gravis. | Day 14, 21 and 28 | No |
Secondary | Single fiber electromyography: jitter, percent abnormal pair, percent blocking | Electrophysiological assessment of neuromuscular transmission. | Days 14 and 28 compared to baseline | No |
Secondary | Repetitive Nerve stimulation studies | Assessment of decrement | Days 14 and 28 | No |
Secondary | Acetylcholine Receptor Antibody titers | Laboratory assay of pathogenic antibody | Day 28 (if positive at baseline) | No |
Secondary | AntiMUSK antibody | Laboratory measure of pathogenic antibody | Day 28 (if positive at baseline) | No |
Secondary | Need for ICU admission, ventilation, intubation | Myasthenic deterioration and crisis | 60 days | Yes |
Secondary | Hospitalization | Myasthenic deterioration and crisis | 60 days | Yes |
Secondary | Need for additional myasthenic treatment | Myasthenic deterioration or crisis | Day 60 | Yes |