Musculoskeletal Disorder Clinical Trial
Official title:
Prospective Evaluation of the Performance and Safety of the PHENIX LIBERTY, a Medical Device for Electrostimulation and Biofeedback, in the Treatment of Locomotor Disorders
Verified date | April 2024 |
Source | Vivaltis |
Contact | George Billard |
Phone | 0467274889 |
georges.billard[@]vivaltis.com | |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
Evaluate the evolution of locomotor abilities in patients treated with functional electrostimulation and biofeedback (PHENIX LIBERTY VIVALTIS device) for musculoskeletal disorders of the knee and spine. Does the use of the medical device in the treatment of musculoskeletal disorders lead to an improvement ? Participants will use the medical device, which provides electrical stimulation, biofeedback and pressure biofeedback to re-educate the muscles of the knee and spine area and
Status | Not yet recruiting |
Enrollment | 27 |
Est. completion date | December 19, 2024 |
Est. primary completion date | December 19, 2024 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 65 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Adult patients (between 18 and 65 years of age); - Patient presenting at least one of the following symptoms related to a locomotor disorder of the knee and/or spine: pain, hypertonia, amyotrophy, mobility restriction, muscle weakness, reduction or loss of motor control, reduction in motor pattern, trophic anomaly; - Patient able to make himself available to attend sessions regularly and is confident of being able to complete all sessions; ; - Patient who has signed the study participation consent form;y; - Patient physically and mentally willing and able, according to the investigator's judgment at the time of recruitment, to perform the procedures under study; - Patient with social security coverage. Exclusion Criteria: - Patients with Stroke, Alzheimer's, multiple sclerosis, peripheral nervous system disorders, spinal cord injury or with cognitive and/or behavioural disorders likely, in the practitioner's judgement in the practitioner's judgement, interact with the self-assessment or biofeedback; - Patients with hypersensitivity to electrostimulation; - Patients who, in the 1 month prior to inclusion, have had injections of corticosteroids (e.g. hyaluronate) in the knee/spine concerned; - Patients with an implanted pacemaker or spinal cord pacemaker; - Pregnant at the time of the inclusion visit, or wishing to become pregnant during the treatment period; - Patients who have renounced their liberty by administrative or judicial sentence, or under guardianship or limited judicial protection; - Patient participating in another interventional clinical trial for the same pathology or testing/having tested an investigational drug in the 30 days prior to inclusion in the study; - Patient unable to read or write French; |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
France | Human Physio | Nîmes |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Vivaltis | CEISO, Human Physio |
France,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Mean change in Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) score on the impact of locomotor disorders of the knee | The Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) is used by physiotherapists and occupational therapists in many clinical settings. It is an English-language measurement tool that collects psychometric data and assesses the functional status of the lower limbs. It consists of 20 questions on the level of difficulty experienced during everyday activities. | At Day 0 and Week 11 (at the end visit within the week after the 12th seance) | |
Primary | Mean change in the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score for the impact of locomotor disorders of the spine. | The ODI will be used to assess the disability caused by Lower Back Pain (LBP)
The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), a patient-completed questionnaire that gives a subjective percentage score of the level of function (disability) in activities of daily living in people undergoing rehabilitation after low back pain. The questionnaire examines the level of disability in 10 activities of daily living. Each item consists of 6 statements rated from 0 to 5. With 0 indicating the lowest level of disability and 5 the highest, the total score is calculated as a percentage, with 0% indicating no disability and 100% indicating the highest level of disability. |
At Day 0 and Week 11 (at the end visit within the week after the 12th seance) | |
Secondary | Change in patients' visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores for knee pain and/or spine pain at rest and on palpation | The pain caused by the TMS of the knee and/or the spine will be assessed by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).
The VAS is made up of a 10-centimeter line anchored by two ends of the pain. 10 is the first end being the "maximum pain imaginable" and 0 is the other end being "no pain" |
At Day 0 and Week 11 (at the end visit within the week after the 12th seance) | |
Secondary | Trends in consumption of painkillers and anti-inflammatories | Rate of consuption of painkillers and anti-inflammatories | At Day 0 and Week 11 (at the end visit within the week after the 12th seance) | |
Secondary | Changes in the rate of improvement of hypertonia of the concerned area (knee or spine) through measurement of myoelectric activity | A surface Electromyography (EMG) will be used. Muscle electrical activity provides a "map" of muscle recruitment according to exercise conditions (position, relative load, type of resistance, type of support, etc.). | At Day 0 and Week 11 (at the end visit within the week after the 12th seance) | |
Secondary | Changes in the rate of improvement of hypertonia of the concerned area (knee or spine) through Oxford Grading Scale | The Oxford scale is commonly used to manually assess muscle strength, and can help diagnose problems in which weakness plays a role. According to the Oxford scale, muscle strength is rated from 0 to 5 (0 being no muscle contraction > 5 being movement through a full range against full resistance). Scoring is as follows: 0 ? No visible or palpable contraction, 1 ? Visible/palpable muscle contraction but no movement, 2 ? Movement across full range with gravity eliminated (low strength), 3 ? Movement across full range against gravity only (fair strength), 4 ? Movement across full range against gravity with some resistance (good strength), 5 ? Movement across full range against gravity with full resistance (normal strength). | At Day 0 and Week 11 (at the end visit within the week after the 12th seance) | |
Secondary | Changes in the rate of improvement in awakening and muscle strengthening through Oxford grading scale | The Oxford scale is commonly used to manually assess muscle strength, and can help diagnose problems in which weakness plays a role. According to the Oxford scale, muscle strength is rated from 0 to 5 (0 being no muscle contraction > 5 being movement through a full range against full resistance). Scoring is as follows: 0 ? No visible or palpable contraction, 1 ? Visible/palpable muscle contraction but no movement, 2 ? Movement across full range with gravity eliminated (low strength), 3 ? Movement across full range against gravity only (fair strength), 4 ? Movement across full range against gravity with some resistance (good strength), 5 ? Movement across full range against gravity with full resistance (normal strength). | At Day 0 and Week 11 (at the end visit within the week after the 12th seance) | |
Secondary | Changes in the rate of improvement in awakening and muscle strengthening through measurement of myoelectric activity | A surface Electromyography (EMG) will be used. Muscle electrical activity provides a "map" of muscle recruitment according to exercise conditions (position, relative load, type of resistance, type of support, etc.). | At Day 0 and Week 11 (at the end visit within the week after the 12th seance) | |
Secondary | Changes of microcirculation of the concerned spine area | Assessment on the basis of clinical palpation examination done by the practitioner | At Day 0 and Week 11 (at the end visit within the week after the 12th seance) | |
Secondary | Changes of the microcirculation of the concerned knee area | The measurement of the muscular perimeter around the concerned knee will be assessed by a tape measure | At Day 0 and Week 11 (at the end visit within the week after the 12th seance) | |
Secondary | Changes of the improvement of the motor control through the measurement of myoelectrical activity | A surface Electromyography (EMG) will be used. Muscle electrical activity provides a "map" of muscle recruitment according to exercise conditions (position, relative load, type of resistance, type of support, etc.). | At Day 0 and Week 11 (at the end visit within the week after the 12th seance) | |
Secondary | Change in patient's quality of life | The SF-36 will be used to assess the quality of life score.
The SF-36, as described in the name, is a 36-item patient-reported questionnaire that covers eight health domains: physical functioning (10 items), bodily pain (2 items), role limitations due to physical health problems (4 items), role limitations due to personal or emotional problems (4 items), emotional well-being (5 items), social functioning (2 items), energy/fatigue (4 items), and general health perceptions (5 items). Scores for each domain range from 0 to 100, with a higher score defining a more favorable health state. |
At Day 0 and Week 11 (at the end visit within the week after the 12th seance) | |
Secondary | Pecentage of patients with an improvement in locomotor disorders | This outcome will be assessed according to the practitioner's opinion. Does the practitioner think that an improvement has been observed --> Yes / No ? | At Day 0 and Week 11 (at the end visit within the week after the 12th seance) | |
Secondary | Incidence of adverse events | Rate of the incidence of adverse events related to the medical device | At Day 0 and Week 11 (at the end visit within the week after the 12th seance) | |
Secondary | Evaluation of responses to the patient satisfaction questionnaire on the use of the PHENIX LIBERTY device after therapeutic management | The satisfaction questionnaire is constructed on the basis of the Likert Scale. The sponsor has written an questionnaire regarding the use of the Phenix Liberty for the patient. The Likert scale (or attitude scale) is a semantic rating system, generally consisting of 5 or 7 items, used in surveys to measure and evaluate perceptions, attitudes and opinions. The evaluation will be based on the following responses: Strongly agree (=5) ; Agree (=4) ; Rather agree (=3) ; Rather disagree (=2) ; Disagree (=1= ; Strongly disagree (=0). The minimum score 0 means a worse outcome and the maximum score 5 means a better outcome. | At Day 0 and Week 11 (at the end visit within the week after the 12th seance) |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT03288688 -
Effect of an Exercise Program Designed for Orchestral Musicians
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05006976 -
A Naturalistic Trial of Nudging Clinicians in the Norwegian Sickness Absence Clinic. The NSAC Nudge Study
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06007885 -
Examining Capacity Building of Youth With Physical Disabilities to Pursue Participation Following the PREP Intervention.
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT06045741 -
Virtual Reality - A New Vision on Pain
|
||
Completed |
NCT03851107 -
The Effectiveness of Participation-focused Interventions on Body Functions of Youth With Physical Disabilities
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04222036 -
Validity and Reliability of the Expectation Scale in the Treatment of Chronic Pain
|
||
Completed |
NCT01654237 -
Musculoskeletal Complaints in an Industry
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06082752 -
The Analysis of the Impact of 5-minute Massage Session on the Muscle Stiffness and Tone
|
N/A | |
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT05551143 -
R2P Field Test of the EMS LiftKit: Validating Usability, Usefulness, Desirability, and Effects on Musculoskeletal Injuries in EMS Providers
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04765787 -
Safety & Efficacy of Nuberol Forte® in Pain Management
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05784285 -
Downstream Effects of Personalized 'Top-down' Participation-based Interventions Among Youth With Physical Disabilities
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03886545 -
Objective Assessment for Caregivers With Work-related Musculoskeletal Disorders of the Shoulder
|
||
Completed |
NCT05207579 -
Urdu Version of Lower Extremity Functional Scale: Reliability and Validity Study
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06380530 -
Advanced Surgical Simulation Processes in the Correction of Skeletal Defects and Deformities
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03913325 -
Early Identification of Risk for and Prevention of Sickness Absence Due to Musculoskeletal Pain - an RCT
|
N/A | |
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT04954612 -
Musculoskeletal Problems in School Children During the COVID-19 Pandemic
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06263504 -
The Influence of Complex Correction of Dental and Musculoskeletal Systems on the Frequency of Relapses of Functional Disorders in Patients With Dental Pathologies.
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06280937 -
Short Term Effect of Wearing a Tie
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04059432 -
CHAIN1 : Dental Wear and Musculoskeletal Disorders - Association?
|
||
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT05700526 -
Customized Bone Allografts by 3D-printing
|
N/A |