Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT06217835 |
Other study ID # |
CamiloJcU-Fisio |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Completed |
Phase |
N/A
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
March 20, 2023 |
Est. completion date |
September 8, 2023 |
Study information
Verified date |
April 2024 |
Source |
Camilo Jose Cela University |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
Gluteus Medius (GM) has also been implicated in the development of Low Back Pain (LBP). GM is
one of the main pelvic, where he actively participates in control of motion in the frontal
and transverse plane, and hip , improving stability to the lumbopelvic-hip complex.
The aim of present study was to investigate whether modifying lower limb length with a
different foot insoles of 0.5, 1 and 1.5 cm in a normal population has an effect on ES and GM
activity and as a consequence in LBP. As a secondary objective, in turn, to evaluate whether
ES and GM activity has an effect on jumping ability as assessed through CMJ.
Description:
Background: Length leg discrepancy (LLD), regardless of its origin, is a very common
pathology that can contribute to low back pain. Various authors point out its relationship
with the lack of activation of both the gluteus medius (GM) and the ipsilateral erector
spinae (ES). The purpose of this study was to identify the activation of Es and GM with
different simulated LLD, correlating said activation with the LBP. In turn, to evaluate
whether ES and GM activity has an effect on jumping ability as assessed through CMJ. (2)
Method: a sample of healthy subjects was selected to whom an artificial LLD was incorporated
through a 0.5, 1 and 1.5 cm insole, measuring with EMGs in these 3 moments while walking and
performing a counter movement jump (CMJ). The measurement was carried out in random order, in
terms of insole height, using a Latin Square. Muscle activation patterns were recorded for 30
seconds at each of the insole heights while walking at 5.7 km/h and compared with the maximum
voluntary contraction (MVC), both on the ipsilateral and contra-lateral sides. These muscles
were then measured under the same circumstances during the development of the CMJ. (3)