Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Clinical Trial
Official title:
Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy With Durvalumab in Combination With Tremelimumab in Patients With Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Ineligible for Cisplatin-based Chemotherapy.
The trial assess the safety and antitumor activity of the anti-PD-L1 antibody Durvalumab in combination with the anti-CTLA4 antibody Tremelimumab.
Background and Rationale:
The outcome for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer treated with surgery alone
remains dismal with a 5 year survival rate between 25% to 80% depending on the tumor stage
and lymph node status. Cisplatin-based chemotherapy regimens (Methotrexate, Vinblastine,
Doxorubicin, Cisplatin ; Cisplatin, Methotrexate, Vinblastine; Gemcitabine/Cisplatin) have
demonstrated a modest but absolute benefit in overall survival of 5-8% when administered in
the neoadjuvant setting. Therefore, neoadjuvant Cisplatin-based regimens are regarded as a
standard of care in treating patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. However, bladder
cancer is a disease of the elderly and due to age-associated factors (e.g. hearing impaired ≥
grade 2), peripheral neuropathy (≥ grade 2), disease associated impairment of renal function
(Glomerular filtration rate < 60 mL/min) and performance status (ECOG ≥ 2) 30 to 50% are
ineligible for cisplatin-based chemotherapy regimens. Several combinations with Carboplatin
have been tested in single arm, phase II trials in patients ineligible for Cisplatin but no
standard regimen has been established for this patient population thus far. The Guidelines of
the European association of Urology (EAU) do not recommend any neoadjuvant treatment for
Cisplatin-ineligible patients.
The advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors like Durvalumab or Azetolizumab, both antibodies
blocking the PD1/PD-L1 interaction, have shown promising results as single agents in terms of
response (15-46%) and tolerability in the metastatic setting of bladder cancer.
A trial evaluating the safety, tolerability and antitumor activity of the combination of the
immune-checkpoint inhibitors Durvarlumab and the anti-CTLA4 antibody Tremelimumab in various
solid tumors, including urothelial carcinoma of the bladder is ongoing (protocol D4190C0010).
Blocking the PD1/PD-L1 pathway in combination with an anti-CTLA4 antibody has shown greater
antitumor activity than each antibody alone in malignant melanoma trials and showed a
promising antitumor activity (17% overall response rate, irrespective of the PD-L1 expression
status on tumor cells) in a phase Ib study of metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. The
safety profile was acceptable (42% grade 3-4 treatment related adverse events across all
dosing cohorts, most common were diarrhea, colitis and increase lipase), however, the rate of
adverse events (e.g. autoimmune phenomena) and treatment interruptions was higher as compared
to single agent use.
Objective:
The Primary objective of the trial is to assess the safety and antitumor activity of the
anti-PD-L1 antibody Durvalumab in combination with the anti-CTLA4 antibody Tremelimumab.
Study Duration:
Trial study duration encompassed the time from when the participant signs the informed
consent until the last protocol-specific procedure has been completed (Cystectomy between
week 17 to 23). All patients will be followed up for up to 78 weeks after end of treatment.
This study will be conducted in compliance with the protocol, the current version of the
Declaration of Helsinki, the ICH-GCP as well as all national legal and regulatory
requirements.
;
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT04687254 -
Gender-related Characteristics of Bladder Cancer Treatment
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT04099589 -
Neoadjuvant Treatment of Upper Urinary and Muscular Invasive Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma
|
Phase 2 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03661320 -
A Study to Compare Chemotherapy Alone Versus Chemotherapy Plus Nivolumab or Nivolumab and BMS-986205, Followed by Continued Therapy After Surgery With Nivolumab or Nivolumab and BMS-986205 in Participants With Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer
|
Phase 3 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT02462239 -
Impact of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Imaging in Muscle-invasive Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder Staging
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04660344 -
A Study of Atezolizumab Versus Placebo as Adjuvant Therapy in Patients With High-Risk Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Who Are ctDNA Positive Following Cystectomy
|
Phase 3 | |
Withdrawn |
NCT03832673 -
Pembrolizumab-Epacadostat Combination to Treat Muscle-invasive Bladder UrotheLIAl canceR: PECULIAR Study
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT06373055 -
Prediction of Therapeutic Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Patients Using Spatial Transcriptomics
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT06335667 -
mpMRI Compared to Diagnostic TURBT in Patients With Suspected Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05945108 -
Brazilian Reality of Urinary Bladder Cancers - BRA-BLADDER
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT06362330 -
Multi-parametric MRI in Patients of Bladder Cancer
|
||
Completed |
NCT04209114 -
A Study of Nivolumab Plus Bempegaldesleukin (Bempeg/NKTR-214) vs Nivolumab Alone vs Standard of Care in Participants With Bladder Cancer That May Have Invaded The Muscle Wall of the Bladder and Who Cannot Get Cisplatin, A Type of Medicine Given To Treat Bladder Cancer
|
Phase 3 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT00808639 -
Dose-Dense MVAC With Pegfilgrastim Support in Subjects With Muscle-Invasive Urothelial Carcinoma
|
Phase 2 |