Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Not yet recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT05200780
Other study ID # muscle ultrasonography
Secondary ID
Status Not yet recruiting
Phase
First received
Last updated
Start date February 1, 2022
Est. completion date February 2023

Study information

Verified date January 2022
Source Assiut University
Contact doaa soliman abdelhafeez
Phone 01033427347
Email doaasoliman133555@gmail.com
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

1-standardization of semi quantitative muscle ultrasonographic parameters ( muscle thickness (MT) and echo intensity (EI) ) in healthy adults and to obtain a set of normal values of all accessible muscle in both upper and lower limbs. 2.standardizaition of quantitative muscle ultrasonographic parameters (Gray scale level (GSL), Calibrated muscle backscatter values (cMBs), Optical Density (OD), 2D Textu1) in healthy adults and to obtain a set of normal values of all accessible muscle in both upper and lower limbs.


Description:

. Ultrasound is a widely used imaging technique in many different medical specialties. It is a non-invasive, safe and relatively cheap investigation method. Ultrasound is a non-invasive method to quantitatively measure various muscle parameters. Ultrasound imaging (US) has shown to be capable of visualizing normal and pathological skeletal muscles.(1) By measuring muscle thickness (MT) and echo intensity (EI) (=grey-value) of the muscle, structural changes caused by neuromuscular disorders can be detected. (2, 3, 4) Quantitative evaluation of US images is preferable over visual evaluation, because it is more sensitive and objective and offers the possibility to perform statistical analysis.(5) A prerequisite for the diagnostic use of quantitative muscle US is the availability of normal reference values. Ultrasonography can detect structural muscle changes caused by neuromuscular disease. Quantitative analysis is the preferred method to determine if ultrasound findings are within normal limits, but normative data are incomplete.(6)


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Not yet recruiting
Enrollment 100
Est. completion date February 2023
Est. primary completion date January 2023
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender All
Age group 5 Years to 70 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: 1. Healthy subjects were recruited amongst colleagues and family members of the researchers 2. Age group (5-70)years 3. Male and female. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Patient refuse to participate 2. The anatomy is altered due to sever trauma,tumor,or surgery

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Device:
ultrasound
All subjects will undergo the tests with the same machine. Transverse ultrasound images were obtained using the Philips HD with a 4-12 MHz probe. in neurosonology unit in neurology department.

Locations

Country Name City State
n/a

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Assiut University

References & Publications (6)

Arts IM, Pillen S, Schelhaas HJ, Overeem S, Zwarts MJ. Normal values for quantitative muscle ultrasonography in adults. Muscle Nerve. 2010 Jan;41(1):32-41. doi: 10.1002/mus.21458. — View Citation

Heckmatt JZ, Dubowitz V, Leeman S. Detection of pathological change in dystrophic muscle with B-scan ultrasound imaging. Lancet. 1980 Jun 28;1(8183):1389-90. — View Citation

Pillen S, van Keimpema M, Nievelstein RA, Verrips A, van Kruijsbergen-Raijmann W, Zwarts MJ. Skeletal muscle ultrasonography: Visual versus quantitative evaluation. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2006 Sep;32(9):1315-21. — View Citation

Pillen S, Verrips A, van Alfen N, Arts IM, Sie LT, Zwarts MJ. Quantitative skeletal muscle ultrasound: diagnostic value in childhood neuromuscular disease. Neuromuscul Disord. 2007 Jul;17(7):509-16. Epub 2007 May 29. — View Citation

Reimers CD, Schlotter B, Eicke BM, Witt TN. Calf enlargement in neuromuscular diseases: a quantitative ultrasound study in 350 patients and review of the literature. J Neurol Sci. 1996 Nov;143(1-2):46-56. Review. — View Citation

Walker FO, Cartwright MS, Wiesler ER, Caress J. Ultrasound of nerve and muscle. Clin Neurophysiol. 2004 Mar;115(3):495-507. Review. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary get a refrence for ultrasonographic parameters muscle use new, easy ,non-invasive tool "neuromuscular ultrasound"
ultrasound give important morphological information of the muscles and can differentiate normal and diseased muscle.
1_use new, easy ,non-invasive tool "neuromuscular ultrasound" 2_ultrasound give important morphological information of the muscles and can differentiate normal and diseased muscle.1_use new, easy ,non-invasive tool "neuromuscular ultrasound" 2_ultrasound give important morphological information of the muscles and can differentiate normal and diseased muscle.
10 months
Secondary detect early pathological changes in muscles Ultrasonography give pathophysiological insights and substantially added to diagnostic accuracy and treatment decisions amongst myopathies 8 months
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT03030547 - Identification of Factors Associated With Physical Activity Levels in Adult Muscle Diseases N/A
Recruiting NCT04233255 - Role of Ultrasound in Diagnosis of Muscle Diseases