View clinical trials related to Multiple Myeloma.
Filter by:This is a prospective, multicentre, phase III, randomised, controlled intervention study. Two groups of patients with equal numbers will be studied and each patient will be allocated to one of the two groups described below by randomisation (ratio 1:1). Each patient will be allocated to one of the two groups described below by randomisation (ratio 1:1). - PASCA interventional group For both the 7 complications of interest (primary objective) and the 13 secondary complications (secondary objective), a specific and proactive referral will be made systematically after each screening assessment, depending on the level of risk, estimated according to decision trees (management guide) and through the dedicated PASCA network of healthcare professionals, in order to initiate early treatment and follow-up if necessary. - Control group For the 7 complications of interest (primary objective) as well as for the 13 complications (secondary objective): all the data from each identification check-up will be sent to the onco-haematological transmitted to the referring onco-haematologists, so that they can initiate their own management. => For all patients, regardless of group All patients will receive four screening assessments covering the 7 complications of interest and 13 secondary complications: - Visit No.1 (T1), 1-2 months after the autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (aHSCT), corresponding to the patient's visit to his or her Multiple Myeloma (MM) monitoring consultation and/or the start of his or her consolidation treatment. - Visit No.2 (T2), 4 months after aHSCT, corresponding to a patient's visit for the end of consolidation treatment; - Visit No.3 (T3), 14 months after the last aHSCT, corresponding to a visit by the patient during his or her maintenance treatment; - Visit No.4 (T4), 24 months after the last aHSCT, corresponding to a visit by the patient for a MM monitoring consultation.
This is a single-arm, non-inferiority study in which patients who have achieved a very good partial response (VGPR) or better, according to International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) response criteria, following 6 to 9 months of treatment with teclistamab, a B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-directed T-cell engager (anti-BCMAxCD3 bispecific antibody), will be offered monitored drug discontinuation. Teclistamab is typically dosed on a regular schedule (every 1-4 weeks) indefinitely until disease progression ("continuous therapy"). Here, a limited-duration regimen will be studied in which patients achieving ≥VGPR after 6-9 months of standard teclistamab dosing will discontinue therapy and resume if laboratory or clinical parameters suggest early disease progression ("limited-duration therapy"). Patients will enter the clinical trial protocol after completing 6-9 months of standard teclistamab monotherapy and achieving ≥VGPR. The study's hypothesis is that the failure probability six months after stopping teclistamab in this patient population will be non-inferior compared to that of historical controls treated with continuous therapy. Reducing drug exposure may be beneficial by reducing risk of infection and reducing anti-BCMA selective pressure toward generation of BCMA-negative relapses. Analysis of minimal residual disease (MRD), tumor features, and bone marrow microenvironment parameters, which will be pursued as exploratory correlative analyses in this study, may identify factors that predict durable response to limited-duration therapy and thereby enable more precise selection of patients likely to benefit from this approach. A subset of patients will be enrolled on a biomarker study for analysis of these exploratory endpoints.
The purpose of the study is to evaluate safety and tolerability of the combination of cevostamab plus elranatamab and also determine the recommended Phase II dose (RP2D) for the study treatment. The study consists of a safety lead-in stage, and an expansion stage.
The purpose of this study is to characterize the safety of QLS32015 injection and to determine the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) and to further evaluate the efficacy and safety of QLS32015 injection in participants with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma at the recommended Phase 2 dose.
This study evaluates the association between a comprehensive geriatric assessment and laboratory biomarkers with the side effects of chemotherapy in older patients with multiple myeloma (MM). The comprehensive geriatric assessment is a tool that can help to determine how fit a patient is. It is composed of a series of questions and tests designed for older people to evaluate their physical function, mental status, mental health, nutritional status, social support, level of social activity, and the presence of other medical problems. In addition to geriatric assessment domains, laboratory biomarkers may provide information on physiologic dysfunction as a measure for evaluation of frailty in the cancer setting. This study will help researchers in the future by predicting which patients will have more side effects with chemotherapy based on their comprehensive geriatric assessment and laboratory biomarkers, which will allow adjustments to treatment in older adult patients with MM.
This research study aims to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the combination of isatuximab, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone (Isa-Pd) for the treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), which refers to multiple myeloma that has returned or has not responded to prior treatment. The study will specifically investigate the impact of administering lower-than-standard doses of pomalidomide and dexamethasone. Using lower doses of pomalidomide and dexamethasone in this setting has not been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
The main aims of this 2-part study are: - Phase I: To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of IDP-121 in patients with multiple myeloma (MM), diffuse large B cell lymphoma not otherwise specified (DLBCL-NOS), high-grade B cell lymphoma with double or triple hit rearrangement (HGBL-DH/TH) and HGBL-NOS, and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). - Phase II: To evaluate the overall response rate (ORR), duration of response (DoR), time to progression (TTP), progression-free survival (PFS), event-free survival (EFS) and Overall survival (OS), in patients with MM, DLBCL-NOS, HGBL-DH/TH, HGBL-NOS or CLL treated with IDP-121 at the recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D).
This is a first in human, phase 1, multicenter, open-label study to determine the safety and tolerability of IGM-2644 as a single agent in participants with relapsed and/or refractory MM, for whom standard therapy does not exist, has proven to be ineffective or intolerable, or is considered inappropriate. Dose escalation and dose expansion cohorts will be enrolled to evaluate safety, preliminary efficacy, and further define a RP2D. The total length of the study, from screening of the first participant to the end of the study, is expected to be approximately 60 months.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SVRd in NDMM patients presenting with extramedullary disease.
The purpose of this study is to learn about the safety and what the body does to the medicine (Maplirpacept) when taken for the treatment of non-Hodgkin lymphoma or multiple myeloma. Non-Hodgkin lymphoma is any of a large group of cancers of lymphocytes (white blood cells). Multiple myeloma is a type of cancer that begins in plasma cells (white blood cells that produce antibodies). This study is seeking participants who: - have non-Hodgkin lymphoma or multiple myeloma. - have worsened with (or lack of improvement to) a standard treatment taken before. - have relatively normal functioning organs. All participants in this study will receive Maplirpacept as an intravenous (IV) infusion (given directly into a vein) at the study clinic every week. Participants will continue to receive Maplirpacept until: - the cancer worsens. - some serious side effects show up. - the participants do not wish to take the study medicine any more. The experiences of the people receiving the study medicine will be collected. This will help to understand if the study medicine Maplirpacept, is safe and can be given to Chinese people.