Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
| NCT number |
NCT04399161 |
| Other study ID # |
JSSDCH/Ethical/05/2016-17 |
| Secondary ID |
|
| Status |
Completed |
| Phase |
Phase 2/Phase 3
|
| First received |
|
| Last updated |
|
| Start date |
February 15, 2017 |
| Est. completion date |
December 20, 2017 |
Study information
| Verified date |
July 2020 |
| Source |
JSS Dental College And Hospital |
| Contact |
n/a |
| Is FDA regulated |
No |
| Health authority |
|
| Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
Dental caries is a localized, post eruptive pathological process involving softening of the
hard tooth tissue and proceeding to the formation of cavity. It results from accumulation of
plaque on the surface of the teeth and biochemical activities of complex microorganisms.
Streptococcus mutans is one of the main pathogens of dental caries. Although brushing has the
potential to maintain adequate levels of oral hygiene, studies demonstrate that such methods
are not being employed sufficiently. The need for additional help in controlling bacterial
plaque provides the rationale for patients using mouth rinses as adjuncts. Chlorhexidine
although considered the gold standard, its side effects due to prolonged use such as staining
of teeth, dry mouth, altered taste sensation, mouth/ throat irritation, etc indicates the
need for alternatives.
Probiotics are live microorganisms that, when administered in adequate amounts, confer a
health benefit on the host. Probiotic technology represents a breakthrough approach to
maintaining oral health by utilizing natural beneficial bacteria commonly found in healthy
mouths to provide a natural defense against those bacteria thought to be harmful to teeth and
gums. The advantages of using a probiotic mouth rinse are that it contains friendly microbes,
there is no issue of antibiotic resistance, and there are no known/proven toxicities caused
due to their use.
Xylitol is a non-sugar sweetener permitted for use in foods. Xylitol is a naturally occurring
non-cariogenic sugar substitute that cannot be metabolized by oral bacteria. This possesses
various properties favorable for caries prevention.It acts by forming of loosely attached
biofilms on the tooth surfaces that can be easily removed. Although many studies have
evaluated the effects of xylitol chewing gum on caries prevention, there are very few
examining the effect of xylitol mouth rinse on oral Streptococcus mutans. Hence xylitol mouth
rinse may be introduced as a possible alternative.
Antimicrobial efficacies of probiotics and xylitol mouth rinses have not been compared till
date. Also their effects on the young and elderly population have not been compared. Hence
the purpose of the study is to compare the antimicrobial efficacies of probiotic & xylitol
mouth rinses with that of chlorhexidine in children and elderly population.
Description:
Need for the study:
World Health Organization defines dental caries as a localized, post eruptive pathological
process of extreme origin involving softening of the hard tooth tissue and proceeding to the
formation of cavity. The process involves bacterial interactions in plaque accumulated on the
surface of the teeth. Streptococcus mutans in plaque is the most commonly isolated organism
amidst all other cariogens. It ferments sucrose and the resulting acid causes
demineralization of tooth enamel.
While mechanical methods of plaque control can maintain adequate oral hygiene, such methods
are not being utilized appropriately by the population. This necessitates use of adjuncts to
mechanical plaque control methods in the form of antiplaque mouth rinses. Chlorhexidine mouth
rinse has been considered the most effective agent in inhibiting Streptococcus mutans.
Although considered the gold standard, its adverse effects due to prolonged use such as
staining of teeth, xerostomia, altered taste sensation, mouth/ throat irritation,
antimicrobial resistance, etc. indicates the need for alternatives which have been
extensively studied of late in literature.
Xylitol used as an artificial sweetener in foods, is a non-cariogenic sugar substitute. This
polyalcohol cannot be metabolized by oral bacteria thereby preventing caries. The magnitude
of adverse effects caused by xylitol as compared to that of Chlorhexidine is indistinct.
Although studies have assessed effects of xylitol chewing gum on caries, very few have
studied its efficacy as a mouth rinse.
Probiotics are live microorganisms that, when administered in adequate amounts, confer a
health benefit on the host. Probiotic products seem to have an effect on the oral health of
individuals by prompting beneficial bacteria to defend teeth and gums against harmful ones.
The advantages of probiotics as compared to that of chlorhexidine mouth rinse are that there
are no issues of antibiotic resistance as it contains only commensal flora and there has been
no proof of intoxication or allergies on consumption.
Antimicrobial efficacies of probiotics and xylitol mouth rinses have not been compared till
date. Their effects on the young and elderly population have not been compared. Hence the
purpose of the present study is to compare the antimicrobial efficacies of probiotic &
xylitol mouth rinses with the gold standard (Chlorhexidine) in children and elderly
population.
Aim of the study:
To compare the antimicrobial efficacy of probiotic and xylitol mouth rinses with
chlorhexidine (gold standard) among children and elderly population at high risk for dental
caries.
Objectives of the study:
1. To assess Streptococcus mutans levels at baseline and 14 days after intervention in
children and elderly population.
2. To compare efficacies of the 3 mouth rinses in reducing Streptococcus mutans levels in
children and elderly.
Materials and methods:
Source of data: Residential school children aged 5-12 years at high risk for caries. Elderly
population above 60 years residing in old age homes at high risk for caries.
Study Design: Double Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.
Sample Size: Twelve participants will be chosen per group. With 3 products involved in each
of the 2 population groups (children and elderly) the sample size will be 36 child
participants and 36 elderly participants.
Consent from participants: Permission to conduct the study in the residential school and old
age home will be obtained from the concerned authorities. Details about the study will be
presented to the participants in the form of a study information sheet or communicated
verbally in both English and in the local language. Only the eligible participants who
provide written consent will be included in the study. In case of children, written consent
will be obtained from the guardians.
Caries risk assessment: Individuals with high caries risk will be identified using a
customized caries risk assessment tool. The caries risk assessment tool will comprise of
information on socio-economic status, oral hygiene practices, fluoride exposure, caries
experience amongst family members, symptoms of dry mouth, quantity and frequency of intake of
sweetened food and caries experience in the past and present. Each item will be scored as 0
or 1 and the total score will be obtained by summing up the scores of all the items. Any
participant with total score greater than 5 will be considered to be at high risk for caries.
Method:
1. Preparation of mouth rinses 2. Baseline data collection and Microbial Analysis 3.
Randomization and Group Allocation 4. Intervention 5. Post intervention data collection and
Microbial Analysis
1. Preparation of mouth rinses:
Xylitol mouth rinse at 10 percentage concentration will be used. Probiotic mouth rinse
will be prepared by using a commercially available probiotic product (Sporolac Plus
powder- 1gm sachet containing not less than 1.5 billion cells of Lactobacillus
acidophilus, Lactobacillus rhamnosus, Bifidobacterium longum, Bacillus coagulans and
Saccharomyces boulardii). Each sachet will be dissolved in 15 ml of water in a measuring
cup and will be used as a mouth rinse. A commercially available Chlorhexidine mouth
rinse (Hexidine- 0.2 percentage Chlorhexidine gluconate) containing 0.2 percentage
chlorhexidine gluconate per 10 ml will be used.
2. Baseline data collection and microbial analysis:
Plaque samples will be collected from the buccal surface of a non-carious permanent maxillary
first molar. Plaque collection will be done using an autoclaved scaler under daylight. The
collected plaque will be stored in a pre-weighed sterile eppendorf tube. Tubes will be
weighed again after plaque collection. The weight of the collected plaque (in grams) will be
determined by subtracting the weight of the empty eppendorf tube from the weight of the tube
with the collected plaque. The samples will be stored at - 4 degree Celsius and transported
to a culture lab within an hour to avoid using transport media.
1 ml saline will be added to the eppendorf tube and vortexed for even distribution of plaque.
This mixture will be used as stock solution for serial dilutions. From the stock solution,
100µl will be transferred to a sterile test tube containing 900µl of saline and vortexed to
arrive at 1:10 dilution. Similar dilutions will be prepared to obtain 1/10, 1/100 and 1/1000
dilutions. 50µl from each of the dilutions will be plated onto the selective medium MSB
(Mitis Salivarius Bacitracin Agar) by spread plate method. After plating, the MSB (Mitis
Salivarius Bacitracin Agar) agar plates will be placed in the anaerobic jar and incubated at
37 degree Celsius for 72 hours.
Colonies of Streptococcus mutans will be identified based on the following morphologic
characteristics, a) 0.5 mm raised convex undulated colonies b) light blue colour with rough
margins c) granular frosted glass appearance. The colonies will be confirmed by a catalase
test (negative catalase reaction) and gram staining (gram positive cocci). Bacterial colonies
will be counted manually. The standard formula for determining Colony Forming Units (CFU)
will be CFU/g= [Number of colonies X Dilution factor] / [Volume plated (in ml) X Amount of
plaque (in g)]
3. Randomization and Group allocation: After data collection at baseline, the study
participants will be allocated to three groups, Group A, B and C, by simple random sampling
(lottery method). Group A will be given Chlorhexidine mouth rinse; Group B will be given
Xylitol mouth rinse and Group C Probiotic mouth rinse. The participants and the investigator
will be blinded from the allocation sequence.
4. Intervention: The participants will be asked to rinse their mouth once daily (at night)
for 2 minutes, using 15 ml of mouth rinse. The intervention will be carried out for a period
of 14 days. Mouth rinsing will be supervised during the study period by an assistant. A
record will be maintained to document regular usage of the mouth rinse and also to record any
adverse effects occurring during the intervention period.
5. Post intervention data collection: After 14 days of using the mouth rinses, the same
procedures will be repeated and compared with baseline.
Statistical Analysis Plan: Data will be analysed using SPSS (Statistical Package for the
Social Sciences Version 22.0; SPSS Incorporated, Chicago, Illinois). Comparisons before and
after interventions will be done using Paired t Test. Comparisons between Chlorhexidine,
probiotic and xylitol groups will be done using ANOVA (Analysis of Variance) and Tukey's Post
Hoc Tests. Comparison of antimicrobial efficacy of mouth rinses between children and elderly
will be done using Independent sample t Test. Statistical significance will be fixed at p ≤
0.05.
