Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT03021863
Other study ID # ThinkWell & BMJ 2
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date January 15, 2017
Est. completion date September 30, 2019

Study information

Verified date March 2021
Source ThinkWell
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Questionnaires are frequently used in online research, however recruiting, and completion rates of online participants from a variety of cultures and demographic backgrounds can be challenging. The challenge is greater in an online cohort because there is no way to observe the participant beyond what is contributed online. Poor recruiting and completion can result in underpowered research that may not be representative of the sample population. This can trigger an increase in costs as the recruitment period may have to be extended until sample size is reached. When recruiting and completion rates are inadequate studies may have to be terminated and the answer to the research question can remain unknown. To mitigate these challenges, reminder emails are sent to questionnaire respondents. There is uncertainty about how the tone of the email reminder affects the proportion of recruitment rates. A nested randomized trial will be used to test the intervention of tone delivery in survey email reminders to establish an evidence base. This study (ResponseQT) proposes to link with the anticipated 20,000 person international cohort study, (How Frequently and in What Format are Research Trial Results Disseminated to Participants: A Survey of Trialists (ResponseQT) to explore the evidence of effect for the research question, "Does the tone of a survey email reminder affect the proportion of survey participants recruited. The population will consist of researchers who have published a clinical trial indexed in Pub Med in 2014-15.The intervention is the tone of questionnaire email reminders and the outcomes will be the proportion of participants recruited after invitation (partial plus complete responses) following reminder 1 and 2.


Description:

RATIONALE Dissemination is the planned process by which results of studies are communicated to the stakeholders of that research. Stakeholders can include health policy makers, academics, practicing clinicians and other health service workers, patients, the general public, and research funders. There are multiple ways to disseminate research findings and it is often considered a shared responsibility between funders and research investigators. Traditionally, the focus has targeted healthcare professionals, policy makers, and academics through journal publications and conference presentations. However, optimal knowledge translation depends on disseminating results to all stakeholders in a way that enables them to consider the implications of the results. Effective communication and active dissemination of research results to patients and the lay public is essential for making informed decisions and choices, but it is sometimes considered as an afterthought. Furthermore, there is no consensus on what dissemination to patients or members of the lay public means, what is the most effective dissemination process and whether research results should be disseminated to relevant patient groups and the wider public as well as the patients who took part in the studies. Only clinical trials indexed in PubMed 2014-15 where participants were enrolled into the study will be included. We will include screening questions at the start of the survey to exclude authors of non-randomised controlled trials, preclinical, and first-in-human trials and trials where there were no study participants. AIM To identify frequency and format of dissemination of clinical trial results to participants and to identify barriers to dissemination. OBJECTIVES 1. To identify frequency of dissemination of recently published clinical trial results to participants; 2. To explore the format of results disseminated to participants and describe researchers' perceived appropriateness and accessibility of the format; 3. To identify how frequently research results are disseminated to patients beyond those taking part in the trials such as via advocacy groups; 4. To explore the frequency of public/patient involvement for determining the format, content, and extent of the dissemination plans; 5. To determine researchers' perceived confidence in disseminating results to participants and other patients. This research will contain a study within a study (SWAT) also known as a nested trial (ResponseQT). SWAT RATIONALE Written communication in questionnaire email reminders are without verbal or sensory cues and it is difficult to modify reminders without feedback from respondents. It would be helpful to know what kind of tone the researcher can take to increase recruitment rates. In questionnaires, the tone could be perceived as the perception of the researcher's attitude toward the reader and the subject of the message. The overall tone of a questionnaire reminder message may affect the reader just as one's tone of voice affects the listener in a verbal exchange. This could influence response and completion rates. Added to the complexity, tone can be interpreted differently by different individuals. Survey communications about reminders suggest two approaches appealing to a team victory with a sense of duty and benefit for others by participating or by building a sense of encouragement for participation. In addition, we will test whether introducing duty or encouragement in the second reminder (after a generic first reminder) makes a difference and whether someone who was exposed to duty or encouragement in the first reminder benefits from the reinforcement of a "nudge" from a generic reminder. METHODS This research involves exploring ways to increase recruitment rates through reminder emails that will be sent to those who were invited but have not yet responded to the questionnaire. A reminder will be sent to all non-respondents by email 14 days following the initial mailing. An additional reminder will be sent to all non-respondents by email 28 days following the first reminder. The nested trial (ResponseQT) will examine the evidence of effect for tone used within the questionnaire reminder emails. The group to which a participant is randomized will determine the tone of the questionnaire reminder emails. All potential respondents will be randomized to one of nine groups. They will receive the same questionnaire invitation email. Reminders for non-responders be assigned according to the group they were randomized to: Group A Tone = Duty x 2 Group B Tone = Encourage x 2 Group C Tone = Encourage + Duty Group D Tone = Duty + encourage Group E Tone = Generic tone reminders X 2 Group F Tone = Generic + Duty Group G Tone = Generic + Encouragement Group H Tone = Duty + Generic Group I Tone = Encouragement + Generic All non-responders will receive a reminder to complete the questionnaire at fourteen days according to the group they are randomized to. At twenty-eight days remaining non-responders will receive the second reminder email. The outcomes of recruitment will be compared at three stages: initial response, following the first reminder and following the second reminder.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 1198
Est. completion date September 30, 2019
Est. primary completion date June 30, 2018
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - reports of clinical trials with human participants indexed in PubMed 2014-15 Exclusion Criteria: - reports of laboratory or animal studies, - reports of preclinical trials, - reports of trials where there were no study participants

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Behavioral:
Group A Reminder
Tone of reminder email (duty 14 days followed by duty 28 days for non-responders)
Group B Reminder
Tone of reminder email (encouragement 14 days followed by encouragement 28 days for non-responders)
Group C Reminder
Tone of reminder email (encouragement 14 days followed by duty for non-responders 28 days)
Group D Reminder
Tone of reminder email (duty 14 days followed by encouragement for non-responders 28 days)
Group E Reminder
Tone of reminder email (generic reminders 14 days followed by 28 days for non-responders)
Group F Reminder
Tone of reminder email (generic 14 days followed by duty for non-responders 28 days)
Group G Reminder
Tone of reminder email (generic 14 days followed by encouragement for non-responders 28 days)
Group H Reminder
Tone of reminder email ( duty14 days followed by generic for non-responders 28 days)
Group I Reminder
Tone of reminder email (encouragement 14 days followed by generic non-responders 28 days)

Locations

Country Name City State
United Kingdom ThinkWell Oxford Oxfordshire

Sponsors (4)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
ThinkWell Queen's University, Belfast, The BMJ, University of Oxford

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United Kingdom, 

References & Publications (7)

Baruch Y, Holtom BC. Survey response rate levels and trends in organizational research. Hum Relations 2008;61:1139-60. doi:10.1177/0018726708094863

Cook DA, Wittich CM, Daniels WL, West CP, Harris AM, Beebe TJ. Incentive and Reminder Strategies to Improve Response Rate for Internet-Based Physician Surveys: A Randomized Experiment. J Med Internet Res. 2016 Sep 16;18(9):e244. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6318. — View Citation

Fan W, Yan Z. Factors affecting response rates of the web survey: A systematic review. Comput Human Behav 2010;26:132-9. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2009.10.015

Fang J, Shao P, Lan G. Effects of innovativeness and trust on web survey participation. Comput Human Behav 2009;25:144-52. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.08.002

Felix LM, Burchett HE, Edwards PJ. Factorial trial found mixed evidence of effects of pre-notification and pleading on response to Web-based survey. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 May;64(5):531-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.06.001. Epub 2010 Sep 17. — View Citation

Tetroe JM, Graham ID, Foy R, Robinson N, Eccles MP, Wensing M, Durieux P, Légaré F, Nielson CP, Adily A, Ward JE, Porter C, Shea B, Grimshaw JM. Health research funding agencies' support and promotion of knowledge translation: an international study. Milbank Q. 2008 Mar;86(1):125-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2007.00515.x. — View Citation

Wilson PM, Petticrew M, Calnan MW, Nazareth I. Disseminating research findings: what should researchers do? A systematic scoping review of conceptual frameworks. Implement Sci. 2010 Nov 22;5:91. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-91. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Recruitment Proportion of sample recruited Duration of study up to 60 days
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT04612842 - Engaging Older Adults in Fall Prevention Using Motivational Interviewing (MI) N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06071130 - Emotion, Aging, and Decision Making N/A
Recruiting NCT06029959 - Stroke and CPAP Outcome Study 3 N/A
Enrolling by invitation NCT05547230 - a Research About the Effect of Body Awareness on Work Motivation and Quality of Life, Among Primary School Teachers
Not yet recruiting NCT04978194 - Effects of an Intervention on University Students' Mental Health and Learning During COVID-19 N/A
Completed NCT04505241 - Evaluating Mechanisms of Action of Adaptive Goal-Setting for Physical Activity N/A
Completed NCT02924025 - Motivational Interviewing as an Intervention for PCOS N/A
Completed NCT01433679 - The Effect of a Web-Based Behavioral Intervention on Physical Activity Levels in Adolescents N/A
Completed NCT00705887 - A Motivational Enhancement Approach to Skin Cancer Prevention N/A
Completed NCT05100524 - Motivational Interview for Daily Living Activities in Elderly People Undergoing Total Knee Replacement N/A
Completed NCT05562245 - Motivational Interviewing-Based Breastfeeding Education N/A
Completed NCT04024371 - Validating Reward-related Biomarkers (RTOC)
Enrolling by invitation NCT03328962 - Smoking Cessation in Cancer Treatment N/A
Recruiting NCT05803213 - Learning Efficacy and Motivation of Medical Students in Clinical Training With Virtual Reality N/A
Completed NCT06044090 - Brain and Stress Study Phase 4
Completed NCT04927923 - The Effect of Hope-focused Motivational Interview on Individuals Receiving Hemodialysis Treatment N/A
Completed NCT05499338 - Motivation as a Strategy for Adherence to a Stretching Program for Basketball Players N/A
Completed NCT03681509 - Pramipexole and Emotional Processing N/A
Recruiting NCT05065151 - Understanding Motivation in Parkinson's Patients Through Neurophysiology N/A
Recruiting NCT06257446 - InformationSeekingMesolimbicEngagementStudy1 N/A