Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Not yet recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT04542122
Other study ID # 1474
Secondary ID
Status Not yet recruiting
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date September 3, 2020
Est. completion date August 2, 2021

Study information

Verified date July 2020
Source University Hospital, Caen
Contact Clement GAKUBA, MD PhD
Phone +33231064736
Email gakuba-c@chu-caen.fr
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The XPHI-COVID19 randomized study aims to investigate the mechanisms of moral judgements in a population of caregivers, using a survey, with the results to the Oxford Utilitarianism Scale as primary outcome.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Not yet recruiting
Enrollment 500
Est. completion date August 2, 2021
Est. primary completion date April 30, 2021
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender All
Age group 18 Years to 99 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- All caregivers from french public healthcare center with Intensive Care Unit

- Agreement

Exclusion Criteria:

- Refuse to participate or withdraw agreement

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Behavioral:
Choices and judgements
In the intervention arm, the participant is asked to answer clinical cases in a reverse order from the control group (control has to make moral choices then judge somebody else's choices ; intervention has to judge moral choices first, then make his own)

Locations

Country Name City State
n/a

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
University Hospital, Caen University of Geneva, Switzerland

References & Publications (8)

Conway P, Goldstein-Greenwood J, Polacek D, Greene JD. Sacrificial utilitarian judgments do reflect concern for the greater good: Clarification via process dissociation and the judgments of philosophers. Cognition. 2018 Oct;179:241-265. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.04.018. Epub 2018 Jul 2. — View Citation

Einav S, Benoit DD. Focus on ethics of admission and discharge policies and conflicts of interest. Intensive Care Med. 2019 Aug;45(8):1130-1132. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05673-3. Epub 2019 Jul 2. — View Citation

Emanuel EJ, Persad G, Upshur R, Thome B, Parker M, Glickman A, Zhang C, Boyle C, Smith M, Phillips JP. Fair Allocation of Scarce Medical Resources in the Time of Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2020 May 21;382(21):2049-2055. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb2005114. Epub 2020 Mar 23. — View Citation

Garbutt G, Davies P. Should the practice of medicine be a deontological or utilitarian enterprise? J Med Ethics. 2011 May;37(5):267-70. doi: 10.1136/jme.2010.036111. Epub 2011 Jan 29. — View Citation

Kahane G, Everett JAC, Earp BD, Caviola L, Faber NS, Crockett MJ, Savulescu J. Beyond sacrificial harm: A two-dimensional model of utilitarian psychology. Psychol Rev. 2018 Mar;125(2):131-164. doi: 10.1037/rev0000093. Epub 2017 Dec 21. Review. Erratum in: Psychol Rev. 2018 Mar;125(2):164. — View Citation

Leclerc T, Donat N, Donat A, Pasquier P, Libert N, Schaeffer E, D'Aranda E, Cotte J, Fontaine B, Perrigault PF, Michel F, Muller L, Meaudre E, Veber B. Prioritisation of ICU treatments for critically ill patients in a COVID-19 pandemic with scarce resources. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2020 Jun;39(3):333-339. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2020.05.008. Epub 2020 May 17. — View Citation

Rosenbaum L. Facing Covid-19 in Italy - Ethics, Logistics, and Therapeutics on the Epidemic's Front Line. N Engl J Med. 2020 May 14;382(20):1873-1875. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2005492. Epub 2020 Mar 18. — View Citation

Truog RD, Mitchell C, Daley GQ. The Toughest Triage - Allocating Ventilators in a Pandemic. N Engl J Med. 2020 May 21;382(21):1973-1975. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2005689. Epub 2020 Mar 23. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Oxford Utilitarianism Scale Two-Dimensional Model of Utilitarian Psychology Up to one year
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT04982770 - Medical Triage in a Time of Scarce Resources. N/A