View clinical trials related to Monkeypox.
Filter by:Given the current emerging epidemic of the MonkeyPox Virus (MPXV) and its route of transmission, the main objective of this pilot study is to characterize the presence of the MPXV in the semen of patients in the acute phase of infection and following this infection.
Monkey pox virus (MPXV), of the genus Orthopoxvirus, regularly causes epidemics in endemic areas of central and western Africa. Since January 1, 2022, cases of Monkey pox have been reported to WHO by 96 Member States in the 6 WHO regions. As of 22 August 2022, a total of 41,664 laboratory-confirmed cases and 192 probable cases, including 12 deaths, have been reported to WHO. Since May 13, 2022, a high proportion of these cases have been reported from countries where monkey pox transmission had not previously been documented. For the first time, cases and sustained chains of transmission are being reported in countries without direct or immediate epidemiological links to areas in West or Central Africa (WHO 2022). France is one of the most affected countries with 2889 cases reported as of August 22, 2022. This situation led the WHO Director General to declare, on July 23, 2022, that the monkeypox epidemic currently affecting several countries constitutes a Public Health Emergency of International Concern. To address this epidemic, the WHO has recommended Post Exposure Vaccination (PEP) and Pre Exposure Vaccination (PrEP) for at risk groups with 2nd and 3rd generation vaccines. In France, the Haute Autorité de Santé (French National Authority for Health) recommended on May 20, 2022, vaccination for PEP and on July 7, 2022, for PrEP with a 3rd generation MVA-BN vaccine (Imvanex® or Jynneos®). The European Medicines Agency (EMA) has approved the use of Imvanex® on July 22, 2022 for immunization against MPXV. The objective of the present study is to describe the clinical, biological, virological, pathophysiological and immunological aspects in the short and medium term of persons vaccinated against and infected with MPXV.
The overall purpose of this study is to evaluate whether tecovirimat is an efficient and safe antiviral in the treatment of monkeypox in adults and adolescents (14 years old and older). The primary objective is to evaluate the clinical efficacy, as assessed by time to all visible lesion(s) resolution, of tecovirimat treatment + Standard of Care (SOC) compared to placebo + SOC for patients with monkeypox. The secondary objective is to evaluate the clinical efficacy, as assessed by mortality, hospitalization, complications, duration of symptoms and virological shedding, and the safety of tecovirimat treatment + SOC compared to placebo + SOC in patients with monkeypox.
MonkeyPox Virus Infectious Disease (MPXVID) is a viral infection caused by the monkeypox virus (MPXV) which is an orthopoxvirus that is endemic in countries in West and Central Africa. The clinical course of the MPXVID is similar to smallpox (variola) but usually milder - with less severe disease symptoms seen in the West African subtype. Historically, the case fatality ratio of MPXVID ranged from 0 to 11% and fatality occurs more commonly among children. In Europe, human MPXVID only occurred as an imported disease with limited onward transmission. However, since May 2022 over 19.000 cases of MPXVID - mostly with the West African subtype - have been reported in Europe without a travel history to the endemic areas in Africa. The far large majority of patients with MPXVID in the current outbreak are gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM). There is an urgent need to address essential knowledge gaps for optimal clinical care and public health management. The aim of this study is to improve our understanding of clinical, virological, and psychosocial outcomes in patients with MPXVID. To get a better understanding of associated risk factors for MPXV infection, and to measure quality of life and stigma, the investigators will also include a control population of men without proctitis and MPXVID-related symptoms at day 0. In addition, the investigators want to assess the vaccine effectiveness against MPXVID of infant smallpox vaccination given before 1974, as well as vaccine effectiveness of the modified vaccinia Ankara (MVA) smallpox vaccine, when administered as pre- or post-exposure prophylaxis in high risk contacts of MPXVD patients.
This observational study has been designed to characterize humoral and cellular immune responses after vaccination against monkeypox (MKP) in HIV positive and negative individuals at high risk of MKP infection during the vaccination campaign in the current monkeypox outbreak.
The purpose of this study is to find out if tecovirimat is a safe and effective drug to treat monkeypox (mpox) in combination with standard of care (SOC). Participants will be randomly assigned to receive oral tecovirimat plus SOC or placebo plus SOC for 14 days.
General objective: to measure the preparedness of pharmacists and medical interns about monkeypox Specific objectives: to evaluate the level of knowledge among pharmacists and medical interns about monkeypox treatment and nature of disease
A5418 is a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study to establish the efficacy of tecovirimat for the treatment of people with laboratory-confirmed or presumptive HMPXV disease.
PLATINUM-CAN is a parallel collaborative trial linked with the sister trial PLATINUM led by Oxford University. PLATINUM-CAN is a multi-centre, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of Tecovirimat in non-hospitalized patients with presumptive or PCR confirmed monkeypox infection. The study will provide evidence on the efficacy and safety of Tecovirimat for laboratory-confirmed monkeypox in outpatients with monkeypox infection and determine the feasibility of conducting interventional monkeypox trials in Canada.
This study is a Phase 2 randomized, open-label, non-placebo controlled, multi-site clinical trial that will evaluate two intradermal (ID) regimens for Modified Vaccinia Ankara-Bavarian Nordic (MVA-BN) vaccine compared to the standard subcutaneous (SC) regimen in healthy, vaccinia-naïve adults 18 to 50 years of age, inclusive. At least 210 participants will be enrolled and randomized to one of three study arms. The two dose sparing strategies include one-fifth (2 x 10^7) and one-tenth (1 x 10^7) of the standard dose of MVA-BN administered ID on Day 1 and 29 (Arm 1 and 2, respectively). The comparator arm (Arm 3) will be the 2-dose standard (1 x 10^8) MVA-BN SC regimen. The study will enroll a 1:1:1 randomization allocation. Participants will not be stratified by clinical trial site, demographic characteristics or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection status; however, these data will be collected during screening and enrollment. Each participant may be screened either in a separate visit in the 7 days prior to Day 1 or on Day 1. The primary hypothesis involves a two-step hierarchical process. The study will first test non-inferiority of the 2 x 10^7 ID regimen relative to 1 x 10^8 SC (standard dose regimen). If the 2 x 10^7 ID regimen is non-inferior to the standard dose regimen, hypothesis testing will proceed to test non-inferiority of the 1 x 10^7 ID regimen relative to the standard dose regimen. The primary objectives are: 1) to determine if peak humoral immune responses following an ID regimen of 2 x 10^7 50% Tissue Culture Infectious Dose (TCID50) MVA-BN are non-inferior to the licensed regimen of 1 x 10^8 MVA-BN administered SC; 2) to determine if peak humoral immune responses following an ID regimen of 1 x 10^7 TCID50 MVA-BN are non-inferior to the licensed regimen of 1 x 10^8 MVA-BN administered SC.