Modified Radical Mastectomy Clinical Trial
Official title:
Thoracic Paravertebral Block Versus Pecs II Block for Perioperative Analgesia in Modified Radical Mastectomy
Breast surgeries are usually associated with significant postoperative pain. Suitability of analgesic technique after breast surgery is always questionable. The aim of this study is to compare US guided Pecs II block versus thoracic paravertebral block performed by US guidance as regards to potential complications and analgesic efficacy of both techniques in the first 24 h after modified radical mastectomy.
Various modalities have been used for perioperative pain management in relevance to breast
surgery. Thoracic epidural and paravertebral blocks (PVB) became the gold standard
techniques to achieve this goal. However, both techniques may be associated with devastating
complications such as spinal cord injury, total spinal anesthesia, inadvertent intravascular
injection and pneumothorax.
On the other hand, the advancement of ultrasound (US) technology and our ability to
visualize the pleura and other structures in and around the paravertebral space has
increased interest in performing thoracic paravertebral blocks guided by US.
"Pecs" block is a less invasive procedure involving US guided interfascial injections has
been suggested as potential alternative analgesic technique. The Pecs I block was initially
described by Blanco for minor breast surgery. A year later, on 2012, he described a Pecs II
block or "modified Pecs block" for breast surgery involving the axilla.
The Pecs I block targets the medial pectoral nerve (MPN) from C8 and T1 and the lateral
pectoral nerve (LPN) from C5, C6, and C7. These nerves arise from the medial and lateral
cords of the brachial plexus, respectively, and innervate the pectoralis muscles.
The Pecs II block targets the T2-6 intercostal nerves, the long thoracic nerve which
supplies the serratus anterior, and the thoracodorsal nerve which supplies the latissimus
dorsi. Potential complications include accidental intravascular injection and pneumothorax.
The easily identifiable landmarks allow this block to provide a simple alternative to
paravertebral and neuraxial blocks for breast surgery. The block produces excellent
analgesia and can be used as a rescue block in cases with patchy or ineffective
paravertebral or epidural block.
;
Allocation: Randomized, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator), Primary Purpose: Prevention
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT03658265 -
Effects of Exercise Training at Different Timeline on Shoulder Dysfunction After Breast Cancer Modified Radical Mastectomy
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01587248 -
Use of Harmonic in Breast Surgery
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT04778267 -
Effectiveness of Combined Erector Spinae and Pecto-intercostal Fascial Plane Blocks Versus Thoracic Paravertebral Block in Perioperative Pain in Modified Radical Mastectomy
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT04908878 -
Combined PECS II and Transeversus Thoracic Plane Blocks Vs Serratus Anterior Plane Block in Modified Radical Mastectomy
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05442268 -
Duloxetine for Postoperative Analgesia After Modified Radical Mastectomy
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06404918 -
Preemptive Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Serratus Anterior Plane Block in MRM
|
N/A |