Dry Needling and Stretching vs. Stretching Alone on Hamstring Flexibility in Patients With Knee Pain

Mobility Limitation Clinical Trial

Official title: The Effectiveness of Dry Needling and Stretching vs. Stretching Alone on Hamstring Flexibility in Patients With Knee Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status Completed

Clinical Trial Summary

The purposes of this double-blinded, randomized controlled trial are (1) to determine if the addition of trigger point dry needling (TDN) to a standard stretching program results in greater improvements in hamstring flexibility versus stretching alone in a population with atraumatic knee pain; (2) measure length of time that flexibility gains are maintained, (3) assess resulting movement mechanics and (4) assess patient reported changes in pain. Findings will potentially lead to insights as to the benefit of applying this intervention to additional body regions.

Clinical Trial Description

In this study, up to 40 subjects with a history of atraumatic knee pain will be randomized into 2 groups of up to 20 subjects per group (1 experimental group and 1 control group). Subjects in the experimental group will receive TDN intervention with hamstring stretching while subjects in the control group will receive an alternative needling intervention with hamstring stretching. After meeting all inclusion criteria, all subjects will undergo the following tests: supine active knee extension, the active straight leg raise test, deep squat, and a single leg step down from a 6 inch step. Subjects who measure less than 20° from full extension on the active knee extension test will be excluded. Hamstring tightness has been operationally defined as having greater than 20° loss of knee extension as measured with the femur held at 90° of hip flexion.[1] Manual palpation of the bilateral biceps femoris, semitendinosus, and semimembranosus will be performed to detect the presence of myofascial trigger points (TPs) in groups 1 and 2. Dry needling will be performed to all detected TPs by a provider trained and experienced in TDN. Post TDN, all tests will be immediately repeated and at each follow up the subject will complete the Global Rating of Change survey (GROC) and Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS).

Post intervention, subjects in experimental group 1 will be given a standing hamstring stretch to perform 1 repetition held for 30 seconds, repeated 3 times daily. These parameters have been shown to be effective at improving flexibility.[2] Subjects will be instructed by demonstration and will be provided with a handout of stretching instructions. Subjects will be given an exercise log to record home exercise compliance.

Subjects in group 2 will be given an alternative needling intervention followed by a standing hamstring stretch to perform 3 times per day, 1 repetition held for 30 seconds. Alternative needling intervention will be performed to give the appearance of regular TDN intervention; however, no needle penetration will be performed. Following alternative needling intervention, subjects will be instructed by demonstration and will be provided with a handout of hamstring stretching instructions. Home exercise compliance will be recorded at each follow up.

Follow up measurements will be recorded between 1-2 days, 3-4 days, and 7-8 days post intervention. All tests will be repeated. One additional session of TDN and alternative needling intervention will be performed at day 3-4. ;

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Outcomes Assessor), Primary Purpose: Treatment

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Mobility Limitation

• NCT number: NCT02498704
• Study type: Interventional
• Source: Keller Army Community Hospital
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: November 2014
• Completion date: October 2015