The Canadian Mitral Research Alliance (CAMRA) Trial CardioLink-2

Mitral Valve Prolapse Clinical Trial

— CAMRA  

Official title:

A Randomized Trial of Mitral Valve Repair With Leaflet Resection Versus Leaflet Preservation on Functional Mitral Stenosis: The Canadian Mitral Research Alliance (CAMRA-1) Trial

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT02552771
• Other study ID #: 15-162
• Status: Recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: January 2016
• Est. completion date: January 2020

Study information

• Verified date: December 2018
• Source: St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto
• Contact: Subodh Verma, MD
• Phone: 416-864-5997
• Email: vermasu[@]smh.ca
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Multicentre, double-armed, randomized controlled trial designed to compare mitral valve leaflet resection versus leaflet preservation with regards to the development of functional mitral stenosis following surgical repair of mitral valve prolapse. Patients will be randomized (1:1) to receive: (1) mitral valve repair with a leaflet resection or (2) mitral valve repair with leaflet preservation (using polytetrafluoroethylene neochordae), followed by echocardiographic and clinical assessment at 12-months following surgery.

Description:

Mitral valve repair has emerged as the preferred surgical treatment for mitral valve prolapse (MVP), a condition wherein the mitral valve does not close properly. One common strategy for mitral valve repair is leaflet resection, which involves removing part of one or both of the mitral leaflets that flop or bulge back (prolapse). Another strategy is leaflet preservation, which involves placing man-made fibers (sutures) to more securely connect the mitral leaflets to the papillary muscles (muscles located in the ventricle). While both strategies are routinely used and lead to successful mitral valve repair, there is no clear evidence as to whether one strategy is better than the other in terms of long term outcome. The purpose of this study is to determine if one repair strategy (leaflet resection versus leaflet preservation) leads to better longer term patient outcomes. A total of 88 patients from 6 Canadian centres will be randomly assigned to one of the two strategies. The primary outcome will be functional mitral stenosis (MS) as assessed by 12-month mean mitral valve pressure gradient at peak exercise.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Recruiting
• Enrollment: 104
• Est. completion date: January 2020
• Est. primary completion date: January 2019
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: N/A and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Patients with mitral regurgitation and mitral valve prolapse who are scheduled for elective mitral valve repair by an experienced mitral valve repair surgeon (>15 degenerative mitral valve repairs per year, with a repair rate>90%, and able to perform mitral repair with either a leaflet resection or leaflet preservation strategy).

2. Planned mitral valve repair amenable to either a leaflet resection or leaflet preservation surgical repair strategy

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Patients with anterior leaflet or commissural prolapse

2. Patients with endocarditis or rheumatic mitral valve disease

3. Patients with mitral annular calcification extending beyond the circumference of one leaflet scallop

4. Patients with significant LV dysfunction defined as a LVEF <40%

5. Patients undergoing concomitant aortic valve surgery

6. Patients unable to undergo bicycle ergometry

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Mitral Valve Prolapse
• Prolapse

Intervention

Procedure:
• Mitral repair with leaflet preservation
Placing man-made fibers (sutures) to more securely connect the mitral leaflets to the papillary muscles (muscles located in the ventricle).
• Mitral repair with leaflet resection
Removing one or both of the mitral leaflets that flop or bulge back.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Canada	Hamilton General Hospital	Hamilton	Ontario
Canada	London Health Sciences Centre	London	Ontario
Canada	McGill University Health Center	Montreal	Quebec
Canada	University of Ottawa Heart Institute	Ottawa	Ontario
Canada	Memorial University	St. John's	Newfoundland and Labrador
Canada	St Michael's Hospital	Toronto	Ontario

Sponsors (3)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto	London Health Sciences Centre, Ottawa Heart Institute Research Corporation

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Canada, 

References & Publications (28)

ATS Committee on Proficiency Standards for Clinical Pulmonary Function Laboratories. ATS statement: guidelines for the six-minute walk test. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002 Jul 1;166(1):111-7. Erratum in: Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016 May 15;193(10):1185. — View Citation

Braunberger E, Deloche A, Berrebi A, Abdallah F, Celestin JA, Meimoun P, Chatellier G, Chauvaud S, Fabiani JN, Carpentier A. Very long-term results (more than 20 years) of valve repair with carpentier's techniques in nonrheumatic mitral valve insufficiency. Circulation. 2001 Sep 18;104(12 Suppl 1):I8-11. — View Citation

Carpentier A. Cardiac valve surgery--the "French correction". J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1983 Sep;86(3):323-37. — View Citation

Castillo JG, Anyanwu AC, Fuster V, Adams DH. A near 100% repair rate for mitral valve prolapse is achievable in a reference center: implications for future guidelines. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012 Aug;144(2):308-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.12.054. Epub 2012 Jun 12. — View Citation

Chan KL, Chen SY, Chan V, Hay K, Mesana T, Lam BK. Functional significance of elevated mitral gradients after repair for degenerative mitral regurgitation. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Nov;6(6):1041-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.112.000688. Epub 2013 Sep 6. — View Citation

Chan V, Jamieson WR, Lam BK, Ruel M, Ling H, Fradet G, Mesana TG. Influence of the On-X mechanical prosthesis on intermediate-term major thromboembolism and hemorrhage: a prospective multicenter study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010 Nov;140(5):1053-8.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.10.068. Epub 2010 May 23. — View Citation

Chan V, Malas T, Lapierre H, Boodhwani M, Lam BK, Rubens FD, Hendry PJ, Masters RG, Goldstein W, Mesana TG, Ruel M. Reoperation of left heart valve bioprostheses according to age at implantation. Circulation. 2011 Sep 13;124(11 Suppl):S75-80. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.011973. — View Citation

Chan V, Ruel M, Chaudry S, Lambert S, Mesana TG. Clinical and echocardiographic outcomes after repair of mitral valve bileaflet prolapse due to myxomatous disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012 Apr;143(4 Suppl):S8-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.01.046. Epub 2012 Feb 4. — View Citation

Chan V, Ruel M, Elmistekawy E, Mesana TG. Determinants of left ventricular dysfunction after repair of chronic asymptomatic mitral regurgitation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015 Jan;99(1):38-42. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.07.025. Epub 2014 Nov 6. — View Citation

Chan V, Ruel M, Hynes M, Chaudry S, Mesana TG. Impact of mitral annular calcification on early and late outcomes following mitral valve repair of myxomatous degeneration. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2013 Jul;17(1):120-5. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivt163. Epub 2013 Apr 14. — View Citation

Enriquez-Sarano M, Avierinos JF, Messika-Zeitoun D, Detaint D, Capps M, Nkomo V, Scott C, Schaff HV, Tajik AJ. Quantitative determinants of the outcome of asymptomatic mitral regurgitation. N Engl J Med. 2005 Mar 3;352(9):875-83. — View Citation

Falk V, Seeburger J, Czesla M, Borger MA, Willige J, Kuntze T, Doll N, Borger F, Perrier P, Mohr FW. How does the use of polytetrafluoroethylene neochordae for posterior mitral valve prolapse (loop technique) compare with leaflet resection? A prospective randomized trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008 Nov;136(5):1205; discussion 1205-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2008.07.028. Epub 2008 Sep 14. — View Citation

Filsoufi F, Carpentier A. Principles of reconstructive surgery in degenerative mitral valve disease. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007 Summer;19(2):103-10. Review. — View Citation

Flack JM, Kvasnicka JH, Gardin JM, Gidding SS, Manolio TA, Jacobs DR Jr. Anthropometric and physiologic correlates of mitral valve prolapse in a biethnic cohort of young adults: the CARDIA study. Am Heart J. 1999 Sep;138(3 Pt 1):486-92. — View Citation

Freed LA, Levy D, Levine RA, Larson MG, Evans JC, Fuller DL, Lehman B, Benjamin EJ. Prevalence and clinical outcome of mitral-valve prolapse. N Engl J Med. 1999 Jul 1;341(1):1-7. — View Citation

Gammie JS, Sheng S, Griffith BP, Peterson ED, Rankin JS, O'Brien SM, Brown JM. Trends in mitral valve surgery in the United States: results from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009 May;87(5):1431-7; discussion 1437-9. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.01.064. — View Citation

Ikonomidis JS, Kratz JM, Crumbley AJ 3rd, Stroud MR, Bradley SM, Sade RM, Crawford FA Jr. Twenty-year experience with the St Jude Medical mechanical valve prosthesis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003 Dec;126(6):2022-31. — View Citation

Kuperstein R, Spiegelstein D, Rotem G, Stein M, Kogan A, Sternik L, Raanani E. Late clinical outcome of transient intraoperative systolic anterior motion post mitral valve repair. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Feb;149(2):471-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.10.043. Epub 2014 Oct 14. — View Citation

Lang RM, Bierig M, Devereux RB, Flachskampf FA, Foster E, Pellikka PA, Picard MH, Roman MJ, Seward J, Shanewise JS, Solomon SD, Spencer KT, Sutton MS, Stewart WJ; Chamber Quantification Writing Group; American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee; European Association of Echocardiography. Recommendations for chamber quantification: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Chamber Quantification Writing Group, developed in conjunction with the European Association of Echocardiography, a branch of the European Society of Cardiology. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2005 Dec;18(12):1440-63. — View Citation

Lange R, Guenther T, Noebauer C, Kiefer B, Eichinger W, Voss B, Bauernschmitt R, Tassani-Prell P, Mazzitelli D. Chordal replacement versus quadrangular resection for repair of isolated posterior mitral leaflet prolapse. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010 Apr;89(4):1163-70; discussion 1170. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.12.057. — View Citation

Ling LH, Enriquez-Sarano M, Seward JB, Tajik AJ, Schaff HV, Bailey KR, Frye RL. Clinical outcome of mitral regurgitation due to flail leaflet. N Engl J Med. 1996 Nov 7;335(19):1417-23. — View Citation

Mesana TG, Lam BK, Chan V, Chen K, Ruel M, Chan K. Clinical evaluation of functional mitral stenosis after mitral valve repair for degenerative disease: potential affect on surgical strategy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Dec;146(6):1418-23; discussion 1423-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.08.011. Epub 2013 Sep 26. — View Citation

Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Erwin JP 3rd, Guyton RA, O'Gara PT, Ruiz CE, Skubas NJ, Sorajja P, Sundt TM 3rd, Thomas JD; American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Jun 10;63(22):2438-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.02.537. Epub 2014 Mar 3. Erratum in: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Jun 10;63(22):2489. — View Citation

O'Brien SM, Shahian DM, Filardo G, Ferraris VA, Haan CK, Rich JB, Normand SL, DeLong ER, Shewan CM, Dokholyan RS, Peterson ED, Edwards FH, Anderson RP; Society of Thoracic Surgeons Quality Measurement Task Force. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2008 cardiac surgery risk models: part 2--isolated valve surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009 Jul;88(1 Suppl):S23-42. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.05.056. — View Citation

Seeburger J, Falk V, Borger MA, Passage J, Walther T, Doll N, Mohr FW. Chordae replacement versus resection for repair of isolated posterior mitral leaflet prolapse: à ègalité. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009 Jun;87(6):1715-20. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.03.003. — View Citation

Shahian DM, O'Brien SM, Filardo G, Ferraris VA, Haan CK, Rich JB, Normand SL, DeLong ER, Shewan CM, Dokholyan RS, Peterson ED, Edwards FH, Anderson RP; Society of Thoracic Surgeons Quality Measurement Task Force. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2008 cardiac surgery risk models: part 3--valve plus coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009 Jul;88(1 Suppl):S43-62. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.05.055. — View Citation

Theal M, Sleik K, Anand S, Yi Q, Yusuf S, Lonn E. Prevalence of mitral valve prolapse in ethnic groups. Can J Cardiol. 2004 Apr;20(5):511-5. — View Citation

Verma S, Mesana TG. Mitral-valve repair for mitral-valve prolapse. N Engl J Med. 2009 Dec 3;361(23):2261-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMct0806111. Review. — View Citation

* Note: There are 28 references in all — Click here to view all references

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Mean mitral valve gradient at peak exercise 12-months following repair		12 months following repair
Secondary	Mitral valve area		12 months following repair
Secondary	Age/Sex predicted metabolic equivalent score		12 months following repair
Secondary	Mitral leaflet coaptation height		12 months following repair
Secondary	6-minute walk test		12 months following repair
Secondary	Composite MACE (major adverse cardiovascular event) end-point of recurrent MR =2+, death, or hospital re-admission for congestive heart failure within 12-months of surgery		12 months following repair