Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT01931956
Other study ID # 0401B
Secondary ID 0401
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date January 22, 2009
Est. completion date June 2018

Study information

Verified date November 2018
Source Abbott Medical Devices
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Prospective, multicenter, continued access registry of the MitraClip® Cardiovascular Valve Repair System in the treatment of mitral valve regurgitation. Patients will undergo 30-day, 6-month, 12-month, 36-month and 60-month clinical follow-up. The study consists of two arms: a High Risk group (NCT01940120) and a Non-High Risk group (NCT00209274) . Patients that did not meet REALISM High Risk or Non-High Risk eligibility criteria were evaluated for consideration for either Emergency Use (EU) or Compassionate Use (CU).


Description:

The EVEREST II REALISM study (REALISM study) is a continued access registry designed for continued data collection on the use of Abbott Vascular's MitraClip System (MitraClip® Device) under more "real world" conditions. After the completion of enrollment in the pivotal EVEREST II Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) NCT00209274 and EVEREST II High Risk Registry Study NCT01940120, continued access to the technology was warranted to collect additional safety and effectiveness data on the MitraClip® Device. This continued access study was approved by FDA on November 21, 2008 (G030064). There are two arms (High Risk and Non-High Risk) in the REALISM study. Patients that did not meet REALISM High Risk or Non-High Risk eligibility criteria were evaluated for consideration for either Emergency Use (EU) or Compassionate Use (CU). Enrollment in the Non-High Risk arm of the study concluded on April 14, 2011 and enrollment in the High Risk arm concluded on December 19, 2013.

REALISM is a prospective, multi-center, study of the safety and effectiveness of an endovascular approach to the treatment of mitral valve regurgitation using the Evalve Cardiovascular Valve Repair System (MitraClip® implant). Patients with moderate-to-severe (3+) or severe (4+) mitral regurgitation (MR), as determined by the site from a transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE), were considered for enrollment in this study. The TTE and a transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) are used to assess eligibility criteria for MR severity, valve anatomy and left ventricular parameters.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 965
Est. completion date June 2018
Est. primary completion date February 2015
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Patients screened in EVEREST II REALISM Study will first be screened for high risk (HR) status and enrolled into the HR arm if they meet eligibility for this arm of the study. If they do not meet eligibility for the HR arm, patients will be further screened for eligibility for enrollment into the non-high risk (NHR) arm.

Key Inclusion Criteria:

- The primary regurgitant jet originates from malcoaptation of the A2 and P2 scallops of the mitral valve (MV)

- Male or non-pregnant female

- Trans-septal catheterization is determined to be feasible by the treating physician

High Risk Arm:

- Predicted procedural mortality risk calculated using the STS surgical risk calculator of =12% or, in the judgment of a cardiac surgeon, the patient is considered a HR surgical candidate due to the presence of one of the following indications:

1. Porcelain aorta or mobile ascending aortic atheroma

2. Post-radiation mediastinum

3. Previous mediastinitis

4. Functional MR with EF <40

5. Over 75 years old with EF<40

6. Re-operation with patent grafts

7. Two or more prior chest surgeries

8. Hepatic cirrhosis

9. Three or more of the following STS high risk factors 9.1 Creatinine >2.5 mg/dL 9.2 Prior chest surgery 9.3 Age over 75 9.4 EF<35

- Symptomatic moderate to severe (3+) or severe (4+) chronic MR and in the judgment of the investigator intervention to reduce MR is likely to provide symptomatic relief for the patient

- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification of ASA IV or lower

Non-High Risk Arm:

- Moderate to severe (3+) or severe (4+) chronic MV regurgitation and:

1. Symptomatic with >25% LVEF and LVESD =55mm or, 2. Asymptomatic with one or more of the following: i. Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) 25% to 60% ii. Left Ventricular End-Systolic Diameter (LVESD) =40 mm iii. New onset of Atrial fibrillation (AFib) iv. Pulmonary arterial systolic pressure (PASP) >50 mmHg at rest or >60 mmHg with exercise

- Candidate for MV repair or replacement surgery, including cardiopulmonary bypass

Key Exclusion Criteria:

- Evidence of an Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) in the prior 12 weeks of the intended treatment

- In the judgment of the Investigator, the femoral vein cannot accommodate a 24 French scale (F) catheter or the presence of an inferior vena cava (IVC) filter would interfere with advancement of the catheter or ipsilateral Deep Venous Thrombus (DVT) is present

- MV orifice area <4.0 cm2

- If leaflet flail is present:

1. Flail Width =15 mm, or

2. Flail Gap =10 mm.

- If leaflet tethering is present:

1. Vertical coaptation length <2 mm

- Leaflet anatomy which may preclude clip implantation, proper clip positioning on the leaflets or sufficient reduction in MR. This may include:

1. Evidence of calcification in the grasping area of the A2 and/or P2 scallops

2. Presence of a significant cleft of A2 or P2 scallops

3. More than one anatomic criteria dimensionally near the exclusion limits

4. Bileaflet flail or severe bileaflet prolapse

5. Lack of both primary and secondary chordal support

- Hemodynamic instability (systolic pressure <90 mmHg without afterload reduction or cardiogenic shock or the need for inotropic support or intra-aortic balloon pump).

- Need for emergency surgery for any reason

- Prior MV surgery or valvuloplasty or any currently implanted mechanical prosthetic valve or currently implanted Ventricular assist device (VAD)

- Echocardiographic evidence of intracardiac mass, thrombus or vegetation

- Active endocarditis or active rheumatic heart disease or leaflets degenerated from either endocarditis or rheumatic disease (i.e. noncompliant, perforated)

- History of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy or subject will refuse blood transfusions

- Life expectancy <12 months

- Active infections requiring current antibiotic therapy

- Patients in whom transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is contraindicated

High Risk Arm:

- EF <20%, and/or LVESD >60 mm

Non-High Risk Arm:

- The need for any other cardiac surgery

- Any endovascular therapeutic interventional or surgical procedure performed within 30 days prior to the index procedure

- Severe Left Ventricular (LV) dysfunction (EF <25% and/or LVESD >55mm)

- Severe mitral annular calcification

- Systolic anterior motion of the MV leaflet

- Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

- History of a stroke or documented Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA) within the prior 6 months

- Upper GI bleeding within the prior 6 months

- Platelet count <75,000 cells/mm³

- Creatinine >2.5mg/dL

Study Design


Intervention

Device:
MitraClip® implant
Percutaneous mitral valve repair using MitraClip implant

Locations

Country Name City State
United States Piedmont Hospital Atlanta Georgia
United States St. Joseph's Hospital Atlanta Georgia
United States University of Colorado Health Sciences Center Aurora Colorado
United States Medical University of South Carolina Charleston South Carolina
United States Carolina's Medical Center (Sanger Clinic) Charlotte North Carolina
United States University of Virginia Health System Charlottesville Virginia
United States Rush University Medical Center Chicago Illinois
United States Cleveland Clinic Foundation Cleveland Ohio
United States Baylor University Medical Center Dallas Texas
United States Duke University Medical Center Durham North Carolina
United States Evanston Hospital Evanston Illinois
United States East Carolina Heart Institute Greenville North Carolina
United States Terrebonne General Medical Center Houma Louisiana
United States Memorial Hermann Hospital Houston Texas
United States The Care Group Medical Center (St. Vincent Hospital) Indianapolis Indiana
United States Cedars-Sinai Medical Center Los Angeles California
United States Baptist Hospital of Miami, FL Miami Florida
United States St. Luke's Medical Center Milwaukee Wisconsin
United States Minneapolis Heart Institute Minneapolis Minnesota
United States St. Patrick's Hospital & Health Science Center Missoula Montana
United States Morristown Memorial Hospital Morristown New Jersey
United States El Camino Hospital Mountain View California
United States Intermountain Medical Center Murray Utah
United States Columbia University Medical Center New York New York
United States Lenox Hill Hospital New York New York
United States New York Presbyterian Hospital New York New York
United States New York University Medical Center New York New York
United States Oklahoma Heart Hospital Oklahoma City Oklahoma
United States Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania
United States Maine Medical Center Portland Maine
United States St. Francis Hospital Roslyn New York
United States William Beaumont Hospital Royal Oak Michigan
United States University of California Davis Medical Center Sacramento California
United States Washington University School of Medicine Saint Louis Missouri
United States University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio Texas
United States Swedish Medical Center Seattle Washington
United States Shawnee Mission Medical Center Shawnee Mission Kansas
United States Washington Hospital Center Washington District of Columbia

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Abbott Medical Devices

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (3)

Glower DD, Kar S, Trento A, Lim DS, Bajwa T, Quesada R, Whitlow PL, Rinaldi MJ, Grayburn P, Mack MJ, Mauri L, McCarthy PM, Feldman T. Percutaneous mitral valve repair for mitral regurgitation in high-risk patients: results of the EVEREST II study. J Am Co — View Citation

Grayburn PA, Roberts BJ, Aston S, Anwar A, Hebeler RF Jr, Brown DL, Mack MJ. Mechanism and severity of mitral regurgitation by transesophageal echocardiography in patients referred for percutaneous valve repair. Am J Cardiol. 2011 Sep 15;108(6):882-7. doi — View Citation

Pope NH, Lim S, Ailawadi G. Late calcific mitral stenosis after MitraClip procedure in a dialysis-dependent patient. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013 May;95(5):e113-4. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.10.067. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Other 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Quality of Life Change From Baseline to 30 Days The SF-36 is a multidimensional, patient-reported survey containing 36 questions on a 0-100 scale measuring physical (Physical Component Score PCS) & mental health status (Mental Component Score MCS) in relation to 8 health concepts:
Physical functioning
Role limitations due to physical or
Emotional health
Bodily pain
General health perceptions
Vitality
Social functioning
General mental health
Responses to each of the SF-36 items are scored and expressed as a score on a 0-100 scale (0% in a domain represents the poorest possible QOL&100% indicates full QOL).Higher scores represent better self-perceived health.
The physical & mental functions were assessed by the Physical Component Summary (PCS) score & Mental Component Summary (MCS) score. Normal PCS and MCS scores vary depending on the demographics of the population studied. The PCS&MCS norms for 65-75 year old are 44 & 52, respectively while the norms for CHF population are 31 & 46, respectively.
30 days
Other 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Quality of Life Change From Baseline to 12 Months The SF-36 is a multidimensional, patient-reported survey containing 36 questions on a 0-100 scale measuring physical (Physical Component Score PCS) & mental health status (Mental Component Score MCS) in relation to 8 health concepts:
Physical functioning
Role limitations due to physical or
Emotional health
Bodily pain
General health perceptions
Vitality
Social functioning
General mental health
Responses to each of the SF-36 items are scored and expressed as a score on a 0-100 scale (0% in a domain represents the poorest possible QOL&100% indicates full QOL).Higher scores represent better self-perceived health.
The physical & mental functions were assessed by the Physical Component Summary (PCS) score & Mental Component Summary (MCS) score. Normal PCS and MCS scores vary depending on the demographics of the population studied. The PCS&MCS norms for 65-75 year old are 44 & 52, respectively while the norms for CHF population are 31 & 46, respectively.
12 months
Other Change in 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) Defined as a cardiopulmonary function test that measures a patient's exercise capacity by the distance he or she can walk in six minutes. At Baseline and 30 Days
Other Change in 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) Defined as a cardiopulmonary function test that measures a patient's exercise capacity by the distance he or she can walk in six minutes. At Baseline and 6 months
Other Change in 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) Defined as a cardiopulmonary function test that measures a patient's exercise capacity by the distance he or she can walk in six minutes. At Baseline and 12 months
Primary Number of Participants With Major Adverse Events A combined clinical endpoint of death, myocardial infarction (MI), re-operation for failed surgical repair or replacement, non-elective cardiovascular surgery for adverse events, stroke, renal failure, deep wound infection, ventilation for greater than 48 hours, gastro-intestinal (GI) complication requiring surgery, new onset of permanent atrial fibrillation, septicemia and transfusion of 2 or more units of blood. 30 days
Primary Number of Participants With Major Adverse Events A combined clinical endpoint of death, myocardial infarction (MI), re-operation for failed surgical repair or replacement, non-elective cardiovascular surgery for adverse events, stroke, renal failure, deep wound infection, ventilation for greater than 48 hours, GI complication requiring surgery, new onset of permanent atrial fibrillation, septicemia and transfusion of 2 or more units of blood. 12 months
Primary Number of Participants With 12-Month Efficacy Defined as freedom from: Surgery for Mitral Regurgitation (MR) or Valve Dysfunction, death, and MR > 2+ (moderate to severe (3+) or severe MR (4+)). 12 months
Secondary Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events The definition of a serious adverse event is an event that is fatal or life threatening, results in persistent or significant disability, requires intervention to prevent permanent impairment/damage, or an event that results in congenital anomaly, malignancy, hospital admission or prolongation of hospitalization. 30 days
Secondary Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events The definition of a serious adverse event is an event that is fatal or life threatening, results in persistent or significant disability, requires intervention to prevent permanent impairment/damage, or an event that results in congenital anomaly, malignancy, hospital admission or prolongation of hospitalization. 12 months
Secondary Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Atrial Septal Defect (ASD) Defined as a significant residual atrial septal opening. Reported as clinically significant if intervention is performed for the primary purpose of repairing the ASD. If cardiac surgery is indicated for reasons other than residual ASD (e.g., residual MR) and the ASD is repaired at the same time, this does not meet the definition of clinically significant ASD. 30 days
Secondary Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Atrial Septal Defect (ASD) Defined as a significant residual atrial septal opening. Reported as clinically significant if intervention is performed for the primary purpose of repairing the ASD. If cardiac surgery is indicated for reasons other than residual ASD (e.g., residual MR) and the ASD is repaired at the same time, this does not meet the definition of clinically significant ASD. 12 months
Secondary Number of Participants With Major Adverse Events (MAE) in Patients Over 75 Years of Age MAE is defined as a combined clinical endpoint of Death (all cause), MI, Re-operation for Failed Surgical Repair or replacement, non-elective Cardiovascular Surgery for AEs, Stroke, Renal Failure, Deep Wound Infection, Ventilation for greater than 48 hours, GI complication requiring surgery, new onset of Permanent Afib, Septicemia, and transfusion of 2 or more units of blood. The occurrence of MAE is measured in patients over 75 years of age. 30 days
Secondary Number of Participants With Major Adverse Events in Patients Over 75 Years of Age MAE is defined as a combined clinical endpoint of Death (all cause), MI, Re-operation for Failed Surgical Repair or replacement, non-elective Cardiovascular Surgery for AEs, Stroke, Renal Failure, Deep Wound Infection, Ventilation for greater than 48 hours, GI complication requiring surgery, new onset of Permanent Afib, Septicemia, and transfusion of 2 or more units of blood. The occurrence of MAE is measured in patients over 75 years of age. 12 Months
Secondary Number of Participants With Major Adverse Events in Patients Over 75 Years of Age MAE is defined as a combined clinical endpoint of Death (all cause), MI, Re-operation for Failed Surgical Repair or replacement, non-elective Cardiovascular Surgery for AEs, Stroke, Renal Failure, Deep Wound Infection, Ventilation for greater than 48 hours, GI complication requiring surgery, new onset of Permanent Afib, Septicemia, and transfusion of 2 or more units of blood. The occurrence of MAE is measured in patients over 75 years of age. 2 years
Secondary Number of Participants With Major Adverse Events in Patients Over 75 Years of Age MAE is defined as a combined clinical endpoint of Death (all cause), MI, Re-operation for Failed Surgical Repair or replacement, non-elective Cardiovascular Surgery for AEs, Stroke, Renal Failure, Deep Wound Infection, Ventilation for greater than 48 hours, GI complication requiring surgery, new onset of Permanent Afib, Septicemia, and transfusion of 2 or more units of blood. The occurrence of MAE is measured in patients over 75 years of age. 3 years
Secondary Number of Participants With Major Adverse Events in Patients Over 75 Years of Age MAE is defined as a combined clinical endpoint of Death (all cause), MI, Re-operation for Failed Surgical Repair or replacement, non-elective Cardiovascular Surgery for AEs, Stroke, Renal Failure, Deep Wound Infection, Ventilation for greater than 48 hours, GI complication requiring surgery, new onset of Permanent Afib, Septicemia, and transfusion of 2 or more units of blood. The occurrence of MAE is measured in patients over 75 years of age. 4 years
Secondary Number of Participants With Major Adverse Events in Patients Over 75 Years of Age MAE is defined as a combined clinical endpoint of Death (all cause), MI, Re-operation for Failed Surgical Repair or replacement, non-elective Cardiovascular Surgery for AEs, Stroke, Renal Failure, Deep Wound Infection, Ventilation for greater than 48 hours, GI complication requiring surgery, new onset of Permanent Afib, Septicemia, and transfusion of 2 or more units of blood. The occurrence of MAE is measured in patients over 75 years of age. 5 years
Secondary Number of Participants With Acute Procedural Success Defined as successful implantation of the Clip(s) with resulting MR severity of 2+ or less as determined by the echocardiographic assessment at discharge. The 30-day echocardiogram will be used if the discharge echocardiogram is unavailable or uninterpretable, providing the patient has not undergone subsequent surgery after attempted clip. At discharge (an average of = 12.3 days post-index procedure)
Secondary Number of Participants With Procedural Success Defined as successful implantation of the Clip(s) with resulting MR severity of 2+ of less at discharge or a 1 grade MR reduction at discharge accompanied by a 1 level reduction in NYHA at 30 days. 30 days
Secondary Number of Participants With Clinical Durability Defined as the proportion of patients who have an acute reduction in MR severity of at least one grade (as measured by the discharge echocardiogram) that at 12 months have not required surgery for valve dysfunction and meet either of the following: 1) MR severity grade of 2+ or less or 2) a one grade reduction in MR severity compared to baseline accompanied by at least a one level reduction in NYHA at 12 months. 12 months
Secondary Number of Participants With Clip Implant Rate Defined as the procedural rate of successful delivery and deployment of Clip implants with echocardiographic evidence of leaflet approximation and retrieval of the investigational delivery catheter. On the day of index procedure (=1 day)
Secondary Procedure Time The mean procedure time is defined as the start time of the transseptal procedure to the time the steerable guide catheter (SGC) is removed. On the day of index procedure
Secondary Device Time Device time is defined as the time of insertion of the Steerable Guide Catheter (SGC) to the time the MitraClip delivery catheter is retracted into the SGC. On the day of index procedure
Secondary Fluoroscopy Duration Mean fluoroscopy duration during the MitraClip procedure. On the day of index procedure
Secondary Number of Participants With MitraClip Devices Implanted The distribution of number of MitraClip devices implanted in patients. On the day of index procedure
Secondary Post-Procedure Intensive Care Unit (ICU)/ Critical Care Unit (CCU)/ Post-anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) Duration Defined as the number of hours for which patients are in an intensive care unit or step down unit before discharge or moving to a standard care unit. At discharge (an average of = 12.3 days post-index procedure).
Secondary Post-Procedure Length of Hospital Stay Defined as the number of days from the end of the procedure until the patient is discharged from the hospital. This does not include time in a nursing or skilled care facility. At discharge (an average of = 12.3 days post-index procedure).
Secondary Number of Participants Experiencing Death Cardiac death is defined as any death in which a cardiac cause cannot be excluded. (This includes but is not limited to acute myocardial infarction, cardiac perforation/pericardial tamponade, arrhythmia or conduction abnormality,cerebrovascular accident within 30 days of the procedure or cerebrovascular accident suspected of being related to the procedure, death due to complication of the procedure, including bleeding, vascular repair, transfusion reaction, or bypass surgery.)
Non-cardiac death is defined as a death not due to cardiac causes (as defined above).
12 months visit window (410 days)
Secondary Number of Participants With Incidence of Discharge to a Nursing Home or Skilled Nursing Facility At discharge (an average of = 12.3 days post-index procedure)
Secondary Number of Participants With Hospital Re-admissions Defined as re-admission of patients to the hospital following discharge from the Clip procedure. 30 days
Secondary Number of Participants With Device Embolization or Single Leaflet Device Attachment (SLDA) A single leaflet device attachment (SLDA) is defined as attachment of one mitral valve leaflet to the MitraClip device. 0 to 5 years
Secondary Number of Participants With Mitral Stenosis Mitral stenosis is a key safety consideration assessed after implantation of the MitraClip device. It is defined as Mitral Valve Area (MVA) less than 1.5 cm^2 as assessed by the Echocardiography Core Laboratory (ECL). 0 to 5 years
Secondary Number of Participants With Mitral Regurgitation (MR) Severity Paired site-assessed Mitral regurgitation severity between baseline and 30 days using echocardiography.
MR severity is graded on a scale of 0+ to 4+ where 0+ means absence of mitral regurgitation, 1+ is mild, 2+ is moderate, 3+ is moderate-to-severe and 4+ is severe.
30 days(Follow-up)
Secondary Number of Participants With MR Severity Paired site-assessed Mitral regurgitation severity between baseline and 12 months using echocardiography. MR severity is graded on a scale of 0+ to 4+ where 0+ means absence of mitral regurgitation, 1+ is mild, 2+ is moderate, 3+ is moderate-to-severe and 4+ is severe. 12 months
Secondary Number of Participants With MR Severity Paired site-assessed Mitral regurgitation severity between baseline and 2 years using echocardiography. MR severity is graded on a scale of 0+ to 4+ where 0+ means absence of mitral regurgitation, 1+ is mild, 2+ is moderate, 3+ is moderate-to-severe and 4+ is severe. 2 years
Secondary Number of Participants With MR Severity Paired site-assessed Mitral regurgitation severity between baseline and 3 years using echocardiography. MR severity is graded on a scale of 0+ to 4+ where 0+ means absence of mitral regurgitation, 1+ is mild, 2+ is moderate, 3+ is moderate-to-severe and 4+ is severe. 3 years
Secondary Number of Participants With MR Severity Paired site-assessed Mitral regurgitation severity between baseline and 4 years using echocardiography. MR severity is graded on a scale of 0+ to 4+ where 0+ means absence of mitral regurgitation, 1+ is mild, 2+ is moderate, 3+ is moderate-to-severe and 4+ is severe. 4 years
Secondary Number of Participants With MR Severity Paired site-assessed Mitral regurgitation severity between baseline and 5 years using echocardiography. MR severity is graded on a scale of 0+ to 4+ where 0+ means absence of mitral regurgitation, 1+ is mild, 2+ is moderate, 3+ is moderate-to-severe and 4+ is severe. 5 years
Secondary Number of Participants With Second Intervention to Place an Additional Mitraclip Device. If residual MR was determined to be clinically unacceptable for patients who received only 1 clip during the index procedure, a second intervention to place an additional MitraClip device could be considered. 139 days post the index procedure
Secondary Number of Participants With Second Intervention to Place an Additional Mitraclip Device. If residual MR was determined to be clinically unacceptable for patients who received only 1 clip during the index procedure, a second intervention to place an additional MitraClip device could be considered. 5 years
Secondary Number of Participants With New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class Paired NYHA data from baseline to 30 days. Class I: Patients with cardiac disease but without resulting limitations of physical activity.
Class II: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in slight limitation of physical activity. Patients are comfortable at rest. Ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea, or anginal pain.
Class III: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in marked limitation of physical activity. They are comfortable at rest. Less than ordinary physical activity causes fatigue, palpitation dyspnea, or anginal pain.
Class IV: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in inability to carry on any physical activity without discomfort. Symptoms of cardiac insufficiency or of the anginal syndrome may be present even at rest. If any physical activity is undertaken, discomfort is increased.
30 days
Secondary Number of Participants With NYHA Functional Class Paired NYHA data from baseline to 12 months. Class I: Patients with cardiac disease but without resulting limitations of physical activity.
Class II: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in slight limitation of physical activity. Patients are comfortable at rest. Ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea, or anginal pain.
Class III: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in marked limitation of physical activity. They are comfortable at rest. Less than ordinary physical activity causes fatigue, palpitation dyspnea, or anginal pain.
Class IV: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in inability to carry on any physical activity without discomfort. Symptoms of cardiac insufficiency or of the anginal syndrome may be present even at rest. If any physical activity is undertaken, discomfort is increased.
12 months
Secondary Number of Participants With NYHA Functional Class Paired NYHA data from baseline to 2 years. Class I: Patients with cardiac disease but without resulting limitations of physical activity.
Class II: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in slight limitation of physical activity. Patients are comfortable at rest. Ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea, or anginal pain.
Class III: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in marked limitation of physical activity. They are comfortable at rest. Less than ordinary physical activity causes fatigue, palpitation dyspnea, or anginal pain.
Class IV: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in inability to carry on any physical activity without discomfort. Symptoms of cardiac insufficiency or of the anginal syndrome may be present even at rest. If any physical activity is undertaken, discomfort is increased.
2 years
Secondary Number of Participants With NYHA Functional Class Paired NYHA data from baseline to 3 years. Class I: Patients with cardiac disease but without resulting limitations of physical activity.
Class II: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in slight limitation of physical activity. Patients are comfortable at rest. Ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea, or anginal pain.
Class III: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in marked limitation of physical activity. They are comfortable at rest. Less than ordinary physical activity causes fatigue, palpitation dyspnea, or anginal pain.
Class IV: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in inability to carry on any physical activity without discomfort. Symptoms of cardiac insufficiency or of the anginal syndrome may be present even at rest. If any physical activity is undertaken, discomfort is increased.
3 years
Secondary Number of Participants With NYHA Functional Class Paired NYHA data from baseline to 4 years. Class I: Patients with cardiac disease but without resulting limitations of physical activity.
Class II: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in slight limitation of physical activity. Patients are comfortable at rest. Ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea, or anginal pain.
Class III: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in marked limitation of physical activity. They are comfortable at rest. Less than ordinary physical activity causes fatigue, palpitation dyspnea, or anginal pain.
Class IV: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in inability to carry on any physical activity without discomfort. Symptoms of cardiac insufficiency or of the anginal syndrome may be present even at rest. If any physical activity is undertaken, discomfort is increased.
4 years
Secondary Number of Participants With NYHA Functional Class Paired NYHA data from baseline to 5 years. Class I: Patients with cardiac disease but without resulting limitations of physical activity.
Class II: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in slight limitation of physical activity. Patients are comfortable at rest. Ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea, or anginal pain.
Class III: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in marked limitation of physical activity. They are comfortable at rest. Less than ordinary physical activity causes fatigue, palpitation dyspnea, or anginal pain.
Class IV: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in inability to carry on any physical activity without discomfort. Symptoms of cardiac insufficiency or of the anginal syndrome may be present even at rest. If any physical activity is undertaken, discomfort is increased.
5 years
Secondary Left Ventricular End-diastolic Volume (LVEDV) Paired Left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) data from baseline to discharge or 30 days as determined by echo core laboratory. At discharge (an average of = 12.3 days post-index procedure) or 30 days
Secondary Left Ventricular End-diastolic Volume (LVEDV) Paired Left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) data from baseline to 12 months as determined by echo core laboratory. 12 months
Secondary Left Ventricular End-diastolic Volume (LVEDV) Paired Left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) data from baseline to 24 months as determined by echo core laboratory. 24 months
Secondary Left Ventricular End-diastolic Volume (LVEDV) Paired Left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) data from baseline to 36 months as determined by echo core laboratory. 36 months
Secondary Left Ventricular End-diastolic Volume (LVEDV) Paired Left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) data from baseline to 48 months as determined by the echo core laboratory. 48 months
Secondary Left Ventricular End-diastolic Volume (LVEDV) Paired Left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) data from baseline to 60 months as determined by echo core laboratory. 60 months
Secondary Left Ventricular End-systolic Volume (LVESV) Paired Left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) data from baseline to discharge or 30 days as determined by echo core laboratory. At discharge (an average of = 12.3 days post-index procedure) or 30 days
Secondary Left Ventricular End-systolic Volume (LVESV) Paired Left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) data from baseline to 12 months as determined by echo core laboratory. 12 months
Secondary Left Ventricular End-systolic Volume (LVESV) Paired Left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) data from baseline to 24 months as determined by echo core laboratory. 24 months
Secondary Left Ventricular End-systolic Volume (LVESV) Paired Left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) data from baseline to 36 months as determined by echo core laboratory. 36 months
Secondary Left Ventricular End-systolic Volume (LVESV) Paired Left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) data from baseline to 48 months as determined by echo core laboratory. 48 months
Secondary Left Ventricular End-systolic Volume (LVESV) Paired Left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) data from baseline to 60 months as determined by echo core laboratory. 60 months
Secondary Left Ventricular Internal Dimension Diastole (LVIDd) Paired Left Ventricular internal dimension diastole (LVIDd) data from baseline to discharge or 30 days as determined by echo core laboratory. At discharge (an average of = 12.3 days post-index procedure) or 30 days
Secondary Left Ventricular Internal Dimension Diastole (LVIDd) Paired Left Ventricular internal dimension diastole (LVIDd) data from baseline to 12 months as determined by echo core laboratory. 12 months
Secondary Left Ventricular Internal Dimension Diastole (LVIDd) Paired Left Ventricular internal dimension diastole (LVIDd) data from baseline to 24 months as determined by echo core laboratory. 24 months
Secondary Left Ventricular Internal Dimension Diastole (LVIDd) Paired Left Ventricular internal dimension diastole (LVIDd) data from baseline to 36 months as determined by echo core laboratory. 36 months
Secondary Left Ventricular Internal Dimension Diastole (LVIDd) Paired Left Ventricular internal dimension diastole (LVIDd) data from baseline to 48 months as determined by echo core laboratory. 48 months
Secondary Left Ventricular Internal Dimension Diastole (LVIDd) Paired Left Ventricular internal dimension diastole (LVIDd) data from baseline to 60 months as determined by echo core laboratory. 60 months
Secondary Left Ventricular Internal Dimension Systole (LVIDs) Paired Left Ventricular internal dimension systole (LVIDs) data from baseline to discharge or 30 days as determined by echo core laboratory. At discharge (an average of = 12.3 days post-index procedure) or 30 days
Secondary Left Ventricular Internal Dimension Systole (LVIDs) Paired Left Ventricular internal dimension systole (LVIDs) data from baseline to 12 months as determined by echo core laboratory. 12 months
Secondary Left Ventricular Internal Dimension Systole (LVIDs) Paired Left Ventricular internal dimension systole (LVIDs) data from baseline to 24 months as determined by echo core laboratory. 24 months
Secondary Left Ventricular Internal Dimension Systole (LVIDs) Paired Left Ventricular internal dimension systole (LVIDs) data from baseline to 36 months as determined by echo core laboratory. 36 months
Secondary Left Ventricular Internal Dimension Systole (LVIDs) Paired Left Ventricular internal dimension systole (LVIDs) data from baseline to 48 months as determined by echo core laboratory. 48 months
Secondary Left Ventricular Internal Dimension Systole (LVIDs) Paired Left Ventricular internal dimension systole (LVIDs) data from baseline to 60 months as determined by echo core laboratory. 60 months
Secondary Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Paired Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) data from baseline to discharge or 30 days as determined by echo core laboratory. At discharge (an average of = 12.3 days post-index procedure) or 30 days
Secondary Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Paired Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) data from baseline to 12 months as determined by echo core laboratory. 12 months
Secondary Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Paired Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) data from baseline to 24 months as determined by echo core laboratory. 24 months
Secondary Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Paired Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) data from baseline to 36 months as determined by echo core laboratory. 36 months
Secondary Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Paired Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) data from baseline to 48 months as determined by echo core laboratory. 48 months
Secondary Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Paired Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) data from baseline to 60 months as determined by echo core laboratory. 60 months
Secondary Septal-Lateral Annular Dimension Diastole (SLADd) Septal-Lateral Annular Dimension Diastole (SLADd) is the dimension across the mitral valve from the anterior annulus to the posterior annulus at the widest point in the center of the valve, measured in diastole. Paired SLADd data from baseline to discharge or 30 days as determined by echo core laboratory. At discharge (an average of = 12.3 days post-index procedure) or 30 days
Secondary Septal-Lateral Annular Dimension Diastole (SLADd) Septal-Lateral Annular Dimension Diastole (SLADd) is the dimension across the mitral valve from the anterior annulus to the posterior annulus at the widest point in the center of the valve, measured in diastole. Paired SLADd data from baseline to 12 months as determined by echo core laboratory. 12 months
Secondary Septal-Lateral Annular Dimension Diastole (SLADd) Septal-Lateral Annular Dimension Diastole (SLADd) is the dimension across the mitral valve from the anterior annulus to the posterior annulus at the widest point in the center of the valve, measured in diastole. Paired SLADd data from baseline to 24 months as determined by echo core laboratory. 24 months
Secondary Septal-Lateral Annular Dimension Diastole (SLADd) Septal-Lateral Annular Dimension Diastole (SLADd) is the dimension across the mitral valve from the anterior annulus to the posterior annulus at the widest point in the center of the valve, measured in diastole. Paired SLADd data from baseline to 36 months as determined by echo core laboratory. 36 months
Secondary Septal-Lateral Annular Dimension Diastole (SLADd) Septal-Lateral Annular Dimension Diastole (SLADd) is the dimension across the mitral valve from the anterior annulus to the posterior annulus at the widest point in the center of the valve, measured in diastole. Paired SLADd data from baseline to 48 months as determined by echo core laboratory. 48 months
Secondary Septal-Lateral Annular Dimension Diastole (SLADd) Septal-Lateral Annular Dimension Diastole (SLADd) is the dimension across the mitral valve from the anterior annulus to the posterior annulus at the widest point in the center of the valve, measured in diastole. Paired SLADd data from baseline to 60 months as determined by echo core laboratory. 60 months
Secondary Septal-Lateral Annular Dimension Systole (SLADs) Septal-Lateral Annular Dimension systole (SLADs) is the dimension across the mitral valve from the anterior annulus to the posterior annulus at the widest point in the center of the valve, measured in systole.Paired SLADs data from baseline to discharge or 30 days as determined by echo core laboratory. At discharge (an average of = 12.3 days post-index procedure) or 30 days
Secondary Septal-Lateral Annular Dimension Systole (SLADs) Septal-Lateral Annular Dimension systole (SLADs) is the dimension across the mitral valve from the anterior annulus to the posterior annulus at the widest point in the center of the valve, measured in systole.Paired SLADs data from baseline to 12 months as determined by echo core laboratory. 12 months
Secondary Septal-Lateral Annular Dimension Systole (SLADs) Septal-Lateral Annular Dimension systole (SLADs) is the dimension across the mitral valve from the anterior annulus to the posterior annulus at the widest point in the center of the valve, measured in systole.Paired SLADs data from baseline to 24 months as determined by echo core laboratory. 24 months
Secondary Septal-Lateral Annular Dimension Systole (SLADs) Septal-Lateral Annular Dimension systole (SLADs) is the dimension across the mitral valve from the anterior annulus to the posterior annulus at the widest point in the center of the valve, measured in systole.Paired SLADs data from baseline to 36 months as determined by echo core laboratory. 36 months
Secondary Septal-Lateral Annular Dimension Systole (SLADs) Septal-Lateral Annular Dimension systole (SLADs) is the dimension across the mitral valve from the anterior annulus to the posterior annulus at the widest point in the center of the valve, measured in systole.Paired SLADs data from baseline to 48 months as determined by echo core laboratory. 48 months
Secondary Septal-Lateral Annular Dimension Systole (SLADs) Septal-Lateral Annular Dimension systole (SLADs) is the dimension across the mitral valve from the anterior annulus to the posterior annulus at the widest point in the center of the valve, measured in systole.Paired SLADs data from baseline to 60 months as determined by echo core laboratory. 60 months
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT03278574 - Flexible Band vs Rigid Ring for Degenerative Mitral Valve Disease N/A
Suspended NCT04960280 - A Study to Evaluate a Computerized Stethoscope Called ©Voqx to Diagnose Heart Disease N/A
Recruiting NCT05021614 - Valveclip® Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair Study N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06167213 - ALLIANCE Mitral: Safety and Effectiveness of SAPIEN X4 Transcatheter Heart Valve - Mitral N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06465745 - AltaValve Pivotal Trial N/A
Withdrawn NCT05040451 - Carillon Mitral Contour System for Treatment of Exercise Induced Functional Mitral Regurgitation
Withdrawn NCT03714412 - Feasibility Study of Patients With Severe MR Treated With the Cardiovalve TMVR System N/A
Recruiting NCT02592889 - (MitraClip in Non-Responders to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy) Phase 4
Completed NCT02355418 - The Role of Myocardial Fibrosis in Degenerative Mitral Regurgitation
Not yet recruiting NCT01431222 - Abrogation of Mitral Regurgitation Using the MitraClip System in High-Risk Patients Unsuitable for Surgery Phase 4
Completed NCT01841554 - Cardioband With Transfemoral Delivery System N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT03870516 - Left Chamber Function in Mitral Regurgitation and Predicting Outcome After Replacement and Targeting for Early Surgery N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT03230747 - SAPIEN M3 EFS: Early Feasibility Study of the Edwards SAPIEN M3 System for the Treatment of Mitral Regurgitation N/A
Enrolling by invitation NCT04031274 - Transcatheter Treatment for Combined Aortic and Mitral Valve Disease. The Aortic+Mitral TRAnsCatheter (AMTRAC) Valve Registry
Completed NCT05836532 - Long Term Results of Surgical and Percutaneous Double Orefices Mitral Repair in Patient With p2 Prolapse Causing Degenerative Mitral Regurgitation
Completed NCT05850026 - Mitral Regurgitation in Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy: Fix it in a Simple, Effective and Durable Way!
Completed NCT05836480 - Immediate Suboptimal Result of Mitral Valve Repair: Late Implications in a Matched Cohort Study
Recruiting NCT03975998 - Dutch-AMR: Early Mitral Valve Repair Versus Watchful Waiting in Asymptomatic Patients With Severe Mitral Regurgitation
Completed NCT01162083 - Identifying an Ideal Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test Parameter N/A
Suspended NCT00787293 - Study of Safety and Efficacy of the Percutaneous Reduction of Mitral Valve Regurgitation in Heart Failure Patients Phase 2