The Accuracy of Conventional Versus Digital Implant Impression Techniques

Status Recruiting

Clinical Trial Summary

Intraoral oral scanning significantly improves scanning accuracy compared to digitized conventional impression techniques. The digitized closed tray impression technique showed significantly more accurate results than the digitized open-tray impression technique in partially edentulous patients.

Clinical Trial Description

The study was a controlled clinical trial using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging and flapless surgical technique to place implants. Cone-beam Computed Topography of the patients was taken by x-ray machine to create a DICOM file of the patient. Intraoral scanning to create STL Files of the patient arches. Each patient had undergone four impression techniques: Conventional impression I; Closed tray impression technique, Conventional impression II; Splinted Open tray impression technique, Digital impression I; intraoral scanning of readymade abutments and Digital impression II; intraoral scanning using scan bodies. To digitize the Conventional impressions I and II, the readymade abutment was screwed on the analogs of the resultant stone casts, followed by digital scanning. Using the scan body, the exact implant position was determined and the implants were added using a digital library. The custom abutment was fabricated on the implant replica with the same readymade abutment measurement. Using the inspection software, a custom abutment was superimposed on each readymade abutment in all the readymade abutment scanning data with the best-fit algorithm. Then the custom abutment was saved as a new STL file for comparison. The digital impression I was set as a reference in all the coming comparisons. The comparison was done from different data acquisition techniques by using inspection software between Digital impression I, Digital impression II; and finally, with the digitized STL of the Conventional impressions I and II. ;

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

Clinical Trial Details

NCT number	NCT04908618
Study type	Interventional
Source	Zagazig University
Contact	mohamed M DOHIEM, lecturer
Phone	00201002411965
Email	mdohiem@zu.edu.eg
Status	Recruiting
Phase	N/A
Start date	May 20, 2021
Completion date	May 22, 2021

View Details

See also
Status	Clinical Trial	Phase
Recruiting	`NCT06007365` - Post Market Clinical FoIIow up (PMCF) Medical Device (MD) of Z-Systems Monotype Zirconia Dental Product: Z5m Dental Implants Registry
Completed	`NCT05350293` - Evaluation of the Abutment Type Following Oral Implants in Terms of the Surrounding Bone Height	N/A
Completed	`NCT05650099` - Peri-implant Health of Dental Implants in the Posterior Region; an Evaluation After 10 Years
Completed	`NCT05359549` - Dental Implant Treatment for Two Adjacent Teeth in the Maxillary Aesthetic Region: an Evaluation After 10 Years
Completed	`NCT02239718` - Novel Use of 2-unit Cantilever Resin-bonded Bridges for Replacing Missing Molar Teeth - a Randomized Clinical Trial	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT04581304` - The Use of Bio-Oss Collagen for Sinus Augmentation Using the Transcrestal Approach.	N/A
Not yet recruiting	`NCT06033989` - Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of the Effect of Hyaluronic Acid Surface Treatment Versus Sandblasted Acid Etched on Stability of Delayed Dental Implant in Posterior Maxilla.	N/A
Completed	`NCT06178796` - Evaluation of the Effect of the Gap Between Bone and Implant Surface on the Implants Stability	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT05649085` - Evaluation of Single-unit Implant-supported Prostheses Survival Using CoCr Prosthetic Abutments: Prospective Observational Study
Completed	`NCT02123420` - Platform Switching vs Regular Platform Implants. One Year Results From a RCT	N/A
Active, not recruiting	`NCT05362591` - Anterior Resin Bonded Restorations for Adolescent	N/A
Active, not recruiting	`NCT04378140` - Retention and Durability of the Anterior Zirconia Wing Bridge
Completed	`NCT01953991` - OHQoL With Removable Partial Dentures; a Pilot Study	N/A
Active, not recruiting	`NCT01229995` - Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial of CAD/CAM and Conventionally Fabricated Singl Implant Abutments.	N/A
Completed	`NCT05476848` - Relationship Between Oral Findings and Salivary Factors in Sars-Cov-2 Patients	N/A
Completed	`NCT05403099` - Effect of Topical Application of Hyaluronic Acid on Stability of Immediate Loading Dental Implant in Posterior Maxilla	N/A
Completed	`NCT03198520` - REFRAME RPD Post-Market Clinical Study	N/A
Active, not recruiting	`NCT06334081` - Different Surgical Drilling Protocols in Posterior Maxilla	N/A
Completed	`NCT03877419` - Comparison of Different Drilling Speed to Classify Bone Quality by Tactile Sensation on a Saw Bone Model
Recruiting	`NCT05089214` - ONE-1 Oral graNd Est 1	N/A

Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.

Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.