Migraine Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Phase 2, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of AMG 334 in Migraine Prevention
Verified date | October 2022 |
Source | Amgen |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
A study to evaluate the effect of erenumab compared to placebo on the change from baseline in monthly migraine days in participants with episodic migraine.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 483 |
Est. completion date | November 12, 2019 |
Est. primary completion date | September 25, 2014 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 60 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - History of migraine for more than12 months prior to screening - Migraine frequency: = 4 and = 14 migraine days per month in each of the 3 months prior to screening and during baseline phase - Headache frequency: < 15 headache days per month (with > 50% of the headache days being migraine days) in each of the 3 months prior to screening and during baseline phase - Demonstrated at least 80% compliance with the eDiary during baseline phase Exclusion Criteria: - Older than 50 years of age at migraine onset - History of cluster headache or basilar or hemiplegic migraine headache - Unable to differentiate migraine from other headaches - No therapeutic response with > 2 of the following eight medication categories for prophylactic treatment of migraine after an adequate therapeutic trial. Medication categories are: - Category 1: Divalproex sodium, sodium valproate - Category 2: Topiramate - Category 3: Beta blockers (for example: atenolol, bisoprolol, metoprolol, nadolol, nebivolol, pindolol, propranolol, timolol) - Category 4: Tricyclic antidepressants (for example: amitriptyline, nortriptyline, protriptyline) - Category 5: Venlafaxine, desvenlafaxine, duloxetine, milnacipran - Category 6: Flunarizine, verapamil - Category 7: Lisinopril, candesartan - Category 8: Butterbur, feverfew, magnesium (= 600 mg/day), riboflavin (= 100 mg/day) - Overuse of acute migraine medications in any month during the 3 months prior to screening or during screening |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Canada | Research Site | Montreal | Quebec |
Canada | Research Site | Toronto | Ontario |
Denmark | Research Site | Aarhus C | |
Denmark | Research Site | Glostrup | |
Finland | Research Site | Helsinki | |
Finland | Research Site | Mikkeli | |
Finland | Research Site | Oulu | |
Finland | Research Site | Tampere | |
Finland | Research Site | Turku | |
Germany | Research Site | Berlin | |
Germany | Research Site | Berlin | |
Germany | Research Site | Berlin | |
Germany | Research Site | Bochum | |
Germany | Research Site | Essen | |
Germany | Research Site | Hamburg | |
Germany | Research Site | Leipzig | |
Norway | Research Site | Ålesund | |
Norway | Research Site | Hamar | |
Norway | Research Site | Sandvika | |
Norway | Research Site | Stavanger | |
Sweden | Research Site | Falköping | |
Sweden | Research Site | Lund | |
Sweden | Research Site | Stockholm | |
Sweden | Research Site | Stockholm | |
Sweden | Research Site | Vällingby | |
United States | Research Site | Ann Arbor | Michigan |
United States | Research Site | Arlington | Texas |
United States | Research Site | Austin | Texas |
United States | Research Site | Bradenton | Florida |
United States | Research Site | Dallas | Texas |
United States | Research Site | Dallas | Texas |
United States | Research Site | Danbury | Connecticut |
United States | Research Site | Decatur | Georgia |
United States | Research Site | Fairfield | Connecticut |
United States | Research Site | Falls Church | Virginia |
United States | Research Site | Greensboro | North Carolina |
United States | Research Site | Houston | Texas |
United States | Research Site | Kalamazoo | Michigan |
United States | Research Site | Lexington | Kentucky |
United States | Research Site | Long Beach | California |
United States | Research Site | Louisville | Kentucky |
United States | Research Site | Melbourne | Florida |
United States | Research Site | Nashville | Tennessee |
United States | Research Site | National City | California |
United States | Research Site | Newport Beach | California |
United States | Research Site | Palm Beach Gardens | Florida |
United States | Research Site | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania |
United States | Research Site | Phoenix | Arizona |
United States | Research Site | Plymouth | Minnesota |
United States | Research Site | Raleigh | North Carolina |
United States | Research Site | Rochester | New York |
United States | Research Site | Saint Louis | Missouri |
United States | Research Site | Salt Lake City | Utah |
United States | Research Site | Salt Lake City | Utah |
United States | Research Site | San Francisco | California |
United States | Research Site | Santa Monica | California |
United States | Research Site | Sherman Oaks | California |
United States | Research Site | Southfield | Michigan |
United States | Research Site | Spring Valley | California |
United States | Research Site | Springfield | Missouri |
United States | Research Site | Stamford | Connecticut |
United States | Research Site | Virginia Beach | Virginia |
United States | Research Site | Watertown | Massachusetts |
United States | Research Site | West Palm Beach | Florida |
United States | Research Site | Wichita | Kansas |
United States | Research Site | Worcester | Massachusetts |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Amgen |
United States, Canada, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Norway, Sweden,
Ashina M, Dodick D, Goadsby PJ, Reuter U, Silberstein S, Zhang F, Gage JR, Cheng S, Mikol DD, Lenz RA. Erenumab (AMG 334) in episodic migraine: Interim analysis of an ongoing open-label study. Neurology. 2017 Sep 19;89(12):1237-1243. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000004391. Epub 2017 Aug 23. — View Citation
Ashina M, Goadsby PJ, Reuter U, Silberstein S, Dodick D, Rippon GA, Klatt J, Xue F, Chia V, Zhang F, Cheng S, Mikol DD. Long-term safety and tolerability of erenumab: Three-plus year results from a five-year open-label extension study in episodic migraine. Cephalalgia. 2019 Oct;39(11):1455-1464. doi: 10.1177/0333102419854082. Epub 2019 May 30. — View Citation
Ashina M, Goadsby PJ, Reuter U, Silberstein S, Dodick DW, Xue F, Zhang F, Paiva da Silva Lima G, Cheng S, Mikol DD. Long-term efficacy and safety of erenumab in migraine prevention: Results from a 5-year, open-label treatment phase of a randomized clinical trial. Eur J Neurol. 2021 May;28(5):1716-1725. doi: 10.1111/ene.14715. Epub 2021 Jan 20. — View Citation
Ashina M, Kudrow D, Reuter U, Dolezil D, Silberstein S, Tepper SJ, Xue F, Picard H, Zhang F, Wang A, Zhou Y, Hong F, Klatt J, Mikol DD. Long-term tolerability and nonvascular safety of erenumab, a novel calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist for prevention of migraine: A pooled analysis of four placebo-controlled trials with long-term extensions. Cephalalgia. 2019 Dec;39(14):1798-1808. doi: 10.1177/0333102419888222. Epub 2019 Nov 10. — View Citation
Cheng S, Picard H, Zhang F, Eisele O, Mikol DD. Efficacy and safety of erenumab for migraine prevention: an overview. Japanese Journal of Headache. 2019; 45 : 493-505.
Kudrow D, Pascual J, Winner PK, Dodick DW, Tepper SJ, Reuter U, Hong F, Klatt J, Zhang F, Cheng S, Picard H, Eisele O, Wang J, Latham JN, Mikol DD. Vascular safety of erenumab for migraine prevention. Neurology. 2020 Feb 4;94(5):e497-e510. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000008743. Epub 2019 Dec 18. Erratum in: Neurology. 2020 Jun 9;94(23):1052. — View Citation
Sakai F, Takeshima T, Tatsuoka Y, Hirata K, Cheng S, Numachi Y, Peng C, Xue F, Mikol DD. Long-term efficacy and safety during open-label erenumab treatment in Japanese patients with episodic migraine. Headache. 2021 Apr;61(4):653-661. doi: 10.1111/head.14096. Epub 2021 Mar 25. — View Citation
Sun H, Dodick DW, Silberstein S, Goadsby PJ, Reuter U, Ashina M, Saper J, Cady R, Chon Y, Dietrich J, Lenz R. Safety and efficacy of AMG 334 for prevention of episodic migraine: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial. Lancet Neurol. 2016 Apr;15(4):382-90. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(16)00019-3. Epub 2016 Feb 12. — View Citation
Zhou Y, Zhang F, Starcevic Manning M, Hu Z, Hsu CP, Chen PW, Peng C, Loop B, Mytych DT, Paiva da Silva Lima G. Immunogenicity of erenumab: A pooled analysis of six placebo-controlled trials with long-term extensions. Cephalalgia. 2022 Jul;42(8):749-760. doi: 10.1177/03331024221075621. Epub 2022 Mar 10. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Change From Baseline in Monthly Migraine Days at Week 12 | A migraine day was any calendar day in which the participant experienced a qualified migraine headache (onset, continuation, or recurrence of the migraine headache). A qualified migraine headache was defined as a migraine with or without aura. The change from baseline in monthly migraine days was calculated as the number of migraine days during the last 4 weeks of the 12-week double-blind treatment phase - the number of migraine days during the 4-week baseline phase. | 4-week baseline phase and the last 4 weeks of the 12-week double-blind treatment phase | |
Primary | CHU Substudy: Number of Participants Who Self-administered a Full Dose, Partial Dose, or No Dose of Erenumab | To assess participants ability to administer a full dose of erenumab in home-use at day 29 (week 4) and day 57 (week 8), site staff called participants and asked whether the participant administered a full, partial, or no dose of erenumab. A full dose means that the entire volume of both prefilled syringes or autoinjector/pens were injected. Discontinued prior to dosing day indicates participants who had discontinued the investigational product and did not attempt to self-administer on day 29 or 57. | CHU substudy day 29 (week 4) and day 57 (week 8) | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants With at Least a 50% Reduction From Baseline in Monthly Migraine Days at Week 12 | A migraine day was any calendar day in which the participant experienced a qualified migraine headache (onset, continuation, or recurrence of the migraine headache). A qualified migraine headache was defined either as a migraine without aura or a migraine with aura. Monthly migraine days were calculated as the number of migraine days in the 4-week baseline phase and during the last 4 weeks of double-blind treatment. At least a 50% reduction from baseline in monthly migraine days was determined if the change in monthly migraine days from the 4-week baseline phase to the last 4 weeks of the 12-week double-blind treatment phase * 100 / baseline monthly migraine days was less than or equal to -50%. | 4-week baseline phase and the last 4 weeks of the 12-week double-blind treatment phase | |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in Monthly Migraine Attacks at Week 12 | A migraine attack is an episode of any qualified migraine headache or migraine specific medication intakes for aura only. A migraine attack that was interrupted by sleep or that temporarily remits and then recurs within 48 hours or an attack treated successfully with medication but that relapses within 48 hours was considered to be one attack.
The change from baseline in monthly migraine attacks was calculated as the number of migraine attacks during the last 4 weeks of the 12-week double-blind treatment phase - the number of migraine attacks during the 4-week baseline phase. |
4-week baseline phase and the last 4 weeks of the 12-week double-blind treatment phase | |
Secondary | Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events in the Double-blind Treatment Phase | An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical trial subject, including worsening of a pre-existing medical condition and laboratory value changes that require treatment or adjustment in current therapy.
AEs were graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.03: Mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms Moderate; minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated; limiting daily activities Severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self-care Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated Death related to AE A serious adverse event is an AE that meets at least 1 of the following criteria: fatal life threatening requires in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity congenital anomaly/birth defect other medically important serious event |
From first dose of study drug in the double-blind treatment phase until the first dose of study drug in the open-label treatment phase (12 weeks) or up to 12 weeks after last dose for participants who did not enter the open-label treatment phase. | |
Secondary | Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events in the Open-label Treatment Phase | An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical trial subject, including worsening of a pre-existing medical condition and laboratory value changes that require treatment or adjustment in current therapy.
AEs were graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.03: Mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms Moderate; minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated; limiting daily activities Severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self-care Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated Death related to AE A serious adverse event is an AE that meets at least 1 of the following criteria: fatal life threatening requires in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity congenital anomaly/birth defect other medically important serious event |
From first dose in the open-label treatment phase up to 12 weeks (participants receiving 70 mg only) or 16 weeks (participants with dose increased to 140 mg) after the last dose; a maximum of 268 weeks. | |
Secondary | CHU Substudy: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events During the CHU Substudy | AEs were graded using the CTCAE version 4.03:
Mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms Moderate; minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated; limiting daily activities Severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self-care Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated Death related to AE A serious adverse event is an AE that meets at least 1 of the following criteria: fatal life threatening requires in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity congenital anomaly/birth defect other medically important serious event An adverse device effect is any AE related to the use of a medical device, including AEs resulting from insufficient or inadequate instructions for use, any malfunction of the device, or use error or from intentional misuse of the device. |
From first dose in the CHU substudy to end of substudy (up to 12 weeks) | |
Secondary | Number of Participants Who Developed Anti-erenumab Antibodies During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | Two validated assays were used to detect the presence of anti-erenumab antibodies. First, an electrochemiluminescent bridging immunoassay was used to detect binding antibodies (screening assay) and confirm antibodies (confirmatory assay) capable of binding erenumab. Second, a cell-based bioassay was used to test positive binding antibody samples for neutralizing activity against erenumab.
Participants who developed anti-erenumab antibodies are participants who were negative or had no result at baseline but positive at any time postbaseline during the DBTP. If a sample was positive for binding antibodies and demonstrated neutralizing activity at the same time point, the participant was defined as positive for neutralizing antibodies. |
12 weeks | |
Secondary | Number of Participants Who Developed Anti-erenumab Antibodies During the Open-label Treatment Phase | Two validated assays were used to detect the presence of anti-erenumab antibodies. First, an electrochemiluminescent bridging immunoassay was used to detect binding antibodies (screening assay) and confirm antibodies (confirmatory assay) capable of binding erenumab. Second, a cell-based bioassay was used to test positive binding antibody samples for neutralizing activity against erenumab.
Participants who developed anti-erenumab antibodies are participants who were negative prior to the first OLTP dose but positive at any time during the OLTP, or participants with no data prior to first dose in OLTP with any post-baseline positive results. If a sample was positive for binding antibodies and demonstrated neutralizing activity at the same time point, the participant was defined as positive for neutralizing antibodies. |
From week 12 up to 12 weeks (participants receiving 70 mg only) or 16 weeks (participants with dose increased to 140 mg) after the last dose; maximum 268 weeks. |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT06192173 -
Patent Foramen Ovale Closure in Migraine
|
||
Completed |
NCT05525611 -
Cabergoline as a Preventive Treatment for Chronic Migraine
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03832998 -
Efficacy and Safety of Erenumab in Pediatric Subjects With Chronic Migraine
|
Phase 3 | |
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT04196933 -
Analysis of Vestibular Compensation Following Clinical Intervention for Vestibular Schwannoma
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06428838 -
Eptinezumab as an Adjunct to Standard of Care for Migraine in an Acute Emergency Context
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT06304675 -
Manageable Environmental Factors in Migraine
|
||
Completed |
NCT04084314 -
Assessment of Prolonged Safety and tOLerability of in Migraine Patients in a Long-term OpeN-label Study
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05517200 -
Pilot Study for a Machine Learning Test for Migraine
|
||
Completed |
NCT04179474 -
Safety, Tolerability and Drug- Drug Interaction Study of Ubrogepant With Erenumab or Galcanezumab in Participants With Migraine
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04603976 -
Registry for Migraine - Clinical Core
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT03597529 -
CHOCOlate MeLatonin for AdolescenT MigrainE
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT04197349 -
Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of ALD1910 in Healthy Men and Woman
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05891808 -
miR-155 Expression in Episodic and Chronic Migraine
|
||
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05064371 -
Long-Term Extension Study With Eptinezumab as Preventive Treatment in Participants With Migraine in Japan
|
Phase 3 | |
Suspended |
NCT04069572 -
Vibratory Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Pain
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT04859374 -
Chronic Pain and Conditioned Pain Modulation After on Line-behavioral Approach
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT03083860 -
Evaluation of Migraine Management Mobile App Combined With Electrophysiological Measurements for Identification of Migraine Attack Risk and Beneficial Preventive Actions.
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02905227 -
A Study of the Pulmonary Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Zolmitriptan Inhalation Powder
|
Phase 1 | |
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT02532023 -
The Combined Effects of omega3 Fatty Acids and Curcumin Supplementation on Inflammatory and Endothelial Factors in Migraine Patients
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT02108678 -
One-Day Intervention for Depression and Impairment in Migraine Patients
|
N/A |