View clinical trials related to Migraine Disorders.
Filter by:The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of BHV-3000 (rimegepant) versus placebo in subjects with Acute Migraines
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of BHV-3000 (rimegepant) versus placebo in subjects with Acute Migraines
Study KCC-SMT-002, is a Phase 1, single-site, open-label, non-randomized, crossover, flexible dose design study to investigate the pharmacokinetic (PK) and safety comparing the Sofusa™ system with sumatriptan (KC5010) to Imitrex® oral tablets in 17 healthy volunteers.
To investigate the role of KATP channels on the cerebral hemodynamic in migraine patients.
The purpose of this study is to investigate the efficacy of the Cefaly® Abortive Program device used at home for 2 hours to treat a migraine attack. This open clinical trial will study the abortive treatment of migraine using the Cefaly® Abortive Program device, prior to development of a sham-controlled trial.
The Preventive Treatment of Migraine with Low-Dose Naltrexone and Acetaminophen Combination: A Small, Randomized, Double-Blind, and Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial with an Open-Label Extension for None-Responders
This proof-of-concept study compares side-by-side low-dose naltrexone and acetaminophen combination to sumatriptan in the acute treatment of migraine.
This pilot study evaluates the addition of chiropractic treatment to conventional neurological care in the treatment of migraine headaches in adult women. Half of the participants will receive 10 chiropractic treatments in addition to their usual care over a 14 week period, while the other half will continue their usual medical care alone, as prescribed by their physician during that time period.
This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Its main purpose is to investigate the effects and neural mechanism of Naoan dripping pills on migraine patients by utilizing fMRI and DTI method, as well as headache evaluation measures such as responder rate, headache duration, PRO scale, etc.
This study was an observational, open-label, cohort-study conducted in accordance with the principles of the Helsinki Declaration. We prospectively and systematically recorded data from the patients and analyzed them retrospectively. During a first phase, called adaptation period, the injector (DR) used a follow-the-pain approach in order to determine the optimal injection scheme for each individual. The possible injection sites were the corrugator, temporalis, and trapezius muscles. Patients were systematically asked about the usual topography and time course of migraine attacks, and the existence of pain or stiffness of the cervical muscles. If the pain was predominantly located in the frontotemporal area, the corrugator and temporalis muscles were injected bilaterally. When the patients had predominant pain in the back of the head, or when their headache pain frequently started and/or ended in the trapezius muscles, both trapezius muscles were injected. These muscle groups were injected together if pain was both frontotemporal and cervico-occipital. When this first set of injections was efficacious, patients were re-injected in the same manner at the time when the frequency of headache days definitely increased. In the absence of efficacy, the paradigm was modified using the same follow-the-pain approach. Once the best procedure was determined for each patient, it was reproduced at each subsequent injection session. This adaptation phase could necessitate up to three sessions. The observation period started 8 weeks before the first efficacious injection and ended 2 months after the second consecutive efficacious injection, or in case of inefficacy. Throughout the adaptation and the observation phases, patients kept a headache diary where they were asked to note the days with headache and the use of rescue medication.