View clinical trials related to Migraine Disorders.
Filter by:Being able to predict each patients response to a specific treatment can mean a significant improvement in socioeconomic costs, but above all in their quality of life. With the present study, the investigators aim to analyze in a combined way different clinical, biological and neuroimaging variables, which allow the clinical staff to anticipate the response to treatment with anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies in patients with migraine.
The study of the ability to predict pain in a migraine attack, through premonitory symptoms and through an ambulatory monitoring device through real-time recording of hemodynamic variables, is one of the strategic lines of research of the unit. of Headaches at the Hospital de La Princesa since 2013 together with the Complutense and Polytechnic University of Madrid. Their results have been reflected in various publications (Pagán J, et al. Sensors 2015; Gago-Veiga AB, et al. J Pain Res 2018) and have promoted the creation of several invention patents.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and performance, including clinical benefit, of the PRIMUS System for the treatment of Resistant Migraine.
The October 2022 Transparency Commission considers that VYEPTI (eptinezumab) is a treatment option for patients suffering from severe migraine with at least 8 migraine days per month, who have failed at least two prophylactic treatments and have no cardiovascular impairment. Since the beginning of 2023, eptinezumab has been available in France as an inpatient treatment prescribed by a migraine neurologist in a growing number of centres. The Saint-Denis Hospital and the Nîmes University Hospital are among the first centres to have started. The investigators from these 2 centres have therefore decided to pool their data to provide the first French feedback on its effectiveness.
The purpose of this study is to determine feasibility and acceptability of telehealth music imagery for migraine (Aim 1) and to explore whether there are clinically meaningful changes in headache frequency and associated patient-centered outcomes (Aim 2).
Research question and objectives Primary endpoint • To evaluate the effectiveness of Rimegepant in the acute treatment of migraine as measured by most severe pain, onset of pain relief, satisfaction with pain relief, and satisfaction with return to normal function post-dose. Secondary Objectives - To evaluate the effectiveness of Rimegepant in the acute treatment of migraine as measured by onset of associated symptoms relief. - To evaluate the long-term effect of Rimegepant treatment on the treatment satisfaction and global impression of change at months 3，6 and 12. Exploratory Objective - To evaluate the long-term effectiveness of Rimegepant by evaluating the changes from baseline in any decrease in MMD with any intensity in those participants with baseline MMD ≥6 days. - To evaluate the long-term effectiveness of Rimegepant by evaluating the changes from baseline of any decrease of MHD. - To evaluate the long-term effectiveness of Rimegepant by evaluating any decrease of mean number of moderate to severe migraine days per month in those participants with baseline MMD ≥6 days - To evaluate the changes from baseline in the percentage of MOH and chronic migraine transformation to episodic migraine during Rimegepant long-term (PRN) use. - To evaluate the changes from baseline of Rimegepant usage, other migraine-related medication usage and MO during Rimegepant long-term (PRN) use. - To evaluate the changes from baseline on quality of life, function, depression and anxiety at months 3, 6 and 12. - To evaluate the association between the timing of Rimegepant dosing (dosing at pain free while with any prodrome symptoms/ dosing at pain free while with any aura symptoms / dosing at mild pain/ dosing at moderate pain/ dosing at severe pain) and the acute treatment effectiveness of Rimegepant. - To evaluate the acute treatment effectiveness of Rimegepant in migraine participants with a history of insufficient response or intolerable to NSAIDs /Triptans /Combination analgesic. - To evaluate the acute treatment effectiveness of combination use of Rimegepant plus NSAIDs/Triptans/Combination analgesic in participants with insufficient response to monotherapy. - To evaluate the acute treatment effectiveness of Rimegepant in migraine participants with prior treatment failure of more than two triptans. Study design This is a single arm, prospective, multi-center, observational registry study with participants receiving Rimegepant for the acute treatment of migraine in a real-world setting. Each participant will receive treatment and care according to standard clinical practice. About 3,000 adult migraine participants will be enrolled continuously at 70 to 73 sites with a headache clinic or headache center in China in approximately 16 consecutive months or until reaching the target sample size.. The index date for a participant will be the date of enrollment. The maximum follow-up period per participant after enrollment is 12 months. At the Baseline Visit, the demographics information, socioeconomic characteristics, and medical and migraine history will be collected from the enrolled participants. For the acute treatment effectiveness evaluation, data on Rimegepant treating single migraine attack including the timing of dosing, most severe pain, onset time of pain relief, onset time of associated symptoms relief, satisfaction with pain relief and satisfaction with function improvement are expected to be captured within 3 months after enrollment through a digital platform. If none of these data are captured within 3 months, the participant will be marked as failed in the study and will not be followed up further. For the long-term effectiveness evaluation, participants will use an eDiary to record headache and migraine occurrence, and use a digital platform to collect Rimegepant and other migraine-related medication usage days every month. At study visits, participants will complete the Migraine-Specific Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (MSQ) v2.1, Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS), Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), Generalized Anxiety Disorder -7 (GAD-7), Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) and the Satisfaction with Medication (SM) scale at months 3, 6 and 12 via electronic patient reported outcomes (ePROs). The previous four scales will be completed by participants at baseline visit.
The goal of this randomized controlled study in Thailand. is to find if there is a role of local anesthetic greater occipital nerve block at Cervical spine level 2 under ultrasound guide in prophylaxis of episodic migraine and chronic migraine in patients with failed oral prophylaxis medication. According to guidelines of the International Headache Society for controlled trials of preventive treatment of migraine attacks in episodic and chronic migraine,the primary and secondary outcome were monitoring followed by these research guideline After informed consent, volunteer will be stratified random into 2 groups of injection agent at unilateral greater occipital nerve block on headache site under US guide by pain physician - Normal saline - 0.5% bupivacaine the injection was done 2 times between Week 0 and week 4 as to wean off placebo effect the volunteer will be monitor by pain diary at 1 month before intervention at week 0,4,8,12 and follow up at week 24 for Migraine Disability Assessment Test (MIDAS) ,Thai Hospital-Anxiety-depression index(Thai-HADS)
The purpose of the study is to investigate how a medication called eptinezumab (Vyepti) given to patients in the Emergency Department (ED) might help prevent migraines from happening again. The results of this study may help inform better ways to manage patients with migraines in the ED. Eptinezumab is currently approved by Health Canada for the preventive treatment of migraine, but its short-term effectiveness in the ED context is unknown. Unlike other migraine treatments used in the ED, eptinezumab can rapidly interrupt the migraine process, potentially also preventing migraine from coming back in the short term. Most patients with a diagnosis of migraine have no access to preventative therapies. This study will be able to provide access to preventative therapy at the earliest stages of a migraine attack. Administering this medication in the ED may stop the attack more effectively compared to current therapies. This study wants to see if eptinezumab could help stop migraines from coming back after individuals have been treated in the ED. The study will also explore whether eptinezumab could reduce how often individuals with migraine might need to come back to the ED, what other medications they might need alongside eptinezumab, and how they feel overall.
Migraine is a frequent and debilitating neurologic disorder. It is more frequent in women, and more prevalent in patients with autoimmune and/or inflammatory diseases such as multiple sclerosis (MS), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), Crohn's disease (CD), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and endometriosis, whereas patients with long standing type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) - an autoimmune but non inflammatory disease - seem to be less affected compared to the general population. Despite new migraine prevention treatments, a large number of patients remain unresponsive to currently available anti-migraine therapy and migraine pathophysiology remains unclear. Several peptides (calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), pituitary adenylate cyclase activating peptide-38 (PACAP-38), vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP)) and hormones (estrogens, prolactin) and the immune system play an important role in migraine pathophysiology. Among T lymphocytes, regulatory T (Treg) cells suppress inflammation. Studies have evidenced higher levels of inflammatory molecules (cytokines) in migraine patients and have suggested decreased proportions of Treg cells in migraine, as well as in MS, RA, CD and SLE, whereas inflammation declines and Treg levels seem increased in long-standing T1DM. Inflammation, which participates in migraine pain, seems to be a common factor for migraine and these diseases. However, these studies display conflicting results and further investigation is required to better understand the mechanisms behind migraine. In this study, the investigators will compare Treg levels, as well as identify Treg subpopulations and measure cytokine levels in migraine and migraine-free participants with and without an autoimmune/inflammatory disorder (MS, RA, CD, SLE, T1DM and endometriosis).
A migraine is a moderate to severe headache typically on one side of the head. A migraine attack is a headache that may be accompanied by throbbing, nausea, vomiting, sensitivity to light and sound, or other symptoms. Menstrual migraine (MM) is defined as migraine attacks that occur within the perimenstrual period (PMP) in at least 2 out of 3 menstrual cycles. The PMP is from 2 days before the onset of menstrual bleeding to 2 days after. This study will assess how safe and effective ubrogepant is in treating menstrual migraine. Adverse Events and change in disease activity will be assessed. Ubrogepant is an investigational drug being developed for short-term prevention of menstrual migraine. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of the 2 groups to receive either ubrogepant or placebo. Around 450 adult female participants with menstrual migraine will be enrolled in approximately 85 sites in the United States and Puerto Rico. Participants will receive oral ubrogepant tablets once daily for 7 consecutive days starting 3 days prior to estimated onset of menses per cycle for 3 PMPs during double-blind period (16 weeks). Eligible participants may continue to receive oral ubrogepant tablets once daily for 7 consecutive days per cycle starting 3 days prior to estimated onset of menses during open-label extension period (52 weeks). There may be higher treatment burden for participants in this trial compared to their standard of care. Participants will collect data daily in electronic diaries and attend regular visits during the study at a hospital or clinic. The effect of the treatment will be checked by medical assessments, blood tests, checking for side effects and completing questionnaires.