Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Phase 2, Randomized, Multicenter Study of PEGPH20 (PEGylated Recombinant Human Hyaluronidase) Combined With Nab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine Compared With Nab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine in Subjects With Stage IV Previously Untreated Pancreatic Cancer
Verified date | July 2020 |
Source | Halozyme Therapeutics |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
This study is designed to compare the treatment effect of PEGPH20 combined with
nab-paclitaxel (NAB) and gemcitabine (GEM) [PAG] to NAB and GEM [AG] in participants with
Stage IV previously untreated pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA).
The study will have 2 run-in phases, one for each formulation of PEGPH20 (original and new
formulations), and a Phase 2 portion. The 2 run-in phases will evaluate the safety and
tolerability of the PAG treatment using the original and new succinic acid PEGPH20
formulation, respectively, compared with AG treatment. Phase 2 will have 2 stages due to a
partial clinical hold that occurred from April through July 2014. The participants will be
randomized in 3:1 for the run-in phases. The first stage will randomize participants in a 1:1
ratio. The second stage will randomize participants in a 2:1 ratio (PAG:AG).
This is an open-label study. To minimize bias to the progression-free survival endpoint,
disease progression will be based on the assessment of the Central Imaging Reader (CIR).
Determination of clinical progression by the Investigator without corresponding CIR
confirmation will be documented with the relevant signs and symptoms.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 279 |
Est. completion date | September 26, 2018 |
Est. primary completion date | May 1, 2018 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility |
Key Inclusion Criteria: - Signed Informed consent. - Histologically confirmed Stage IV PDA with documented disseminated neoplasm to liver and /or lung. Must have archival or fresh tissue (block /slides) available pre-dose. - One or more metastatic tumors measurable on computed tomography (CT) scan per RECIST v.1.1 , excluding the primary pancreatic lesion. - No previous radiotherapy, surgery, chemotherapy or investigational therapy for the treatment of metastatic disease. - Karnofsky Performance Status greater than or equal to (=) 70%. - Life expectancy =3 months. - Age =18 years. - Screening laboratory values of hemoglobin, platelets, absolute neutrophil count (ANC), bilirubin, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), serum creatinine, serum albumin, prothrombin time/international normalized ratio (INR), and partial thromboplastin time (PTT) within specified values/criteria per protocol prior to dosing. Key Exclusion Criteria: - Non-metastatic PDA. - Evidence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), or other known thromboembolic event present during screening period. - Known central nervous system involvement or brain metastasis. - New York (NY) Heart Association Class III or IV cardiac disease or myocardial infarction within the past 12 months. - Prior history of cerebrovascular accident or transient ischemic attack. - Pre-existing carotid artery disease. - Active, uncontrolled bacterial, viral, or fungal infection requiring systemic therapy. - Current use of megestrol acetate (use within 10 days of Day 1). - Known infection with human immunodeficiency virus, Hepatitis B, or Hepatitis C. - History of another primary cancer within the last 3 years with the exception of non-melanoma skin cancer, early state prostate cancer, or curatively-treated cervical cancer in-situ. - Contraindication to heparin as per National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines. - Previous major bleed (bleeding requiring transfusion of red blood cells) on low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH). - Any other disease, metabolic dysfunction, physical examination finding or clinical laboratory finding that leads to reasonable suspicion of disease or condition that contraindicates the use of an investigational drug, that may affect interpretation of results, or render the participant at a high risk of treatment complications. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | University of Michigan | Ann Arbor | Michigan |
United States | Piedmont Hospital | Atlanta | Georgia |
United States | University of Colorado Cancer Center | Aurora | Colorado |
United States | Johns Hopkins University Hospital | Baltimore | Maryland |
United States | Alabama Oncology | Birmingham | Alabama |
United States | Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center | Boston | Massachusetts |
United States | Roswell Park Cancer Institute | Buffalo | New York |
United States | Providence St Joseph Medical Center | Burbank | California |
United States | Lahey Clinic | Burlington | Massachusetts |
United States | Gabrail Cancer Center | Canton | Ohio |
United States | Texas Oncology - Baylor | Dallas | Texas |
United States | Rocky Mountain Cancer Center | Denver | Colorado |
United States | Highlands Oncology Group | Fayetteville | Arkansas |
United States | Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center | Gilbert | Arizona |
United States | Greenville Health System | Greenville | South Carolina |
United States | Research Medical Center | Kansas City | Missouri |
United States | Columbia Basin Hematology and Oncology | Kennewick | Washington |
United States | Scripps Cancer Center | La Jolla | California |
United States | UCSD - Moore's Cancer Center | La Jolla | California |
United States | North Shore Long Island Jewish Health System | Lake Success | New York |
United States | Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada | Las Vegas | Nevada |
United States | Cedars-Sinai Medical Center | Los Angeles | California |
United States | Norton Cancer Institute - Norton HealthCare Pavilion | Louisville | Kentucky |
United States | University of Wisconsin Hospitals and Clinics | Madison | Wisconsin |
United States | Loyola University Medical Center | Maywood | Illinois |
United States | University of Miami, Sylvester comprehensive Cancer Center | Miami | Florida |
United States | Froedtert Hospital, Medical College of Wisconsin | Milwaukee | Wisconsin |
United States | Unniversity of Minnesota | Minneapolis | Minnesota |
United States | Virginia Piper Cancer Institute | Minneapolis | Minnesota |
United States | University of South Alabama Mitchell Cancer Institute | Mobile | Alabama |
United States | Cancer Care Centers of South Texas | New Braunfels | Texas |
United States | Columbia University Medical Center | New York | New York |
United States | Mount Sinai Medical Center | New York | New York |
United States | University of Oklahoma Health Science Center | Oklahoma City | Oklahoma |
United States | University of California Medical Center | Orange | California |
United States | St. Joseph's Regional Medical Center | Paterson | New Jersey |
United States | UPMC Cancer Center | Pittsburgh | Pennsylvania |
United States | University of Rochester | Rochester | New York |
United States | Saint Helena Hospital | Saint Helena | California |
United States | Washington University School of Medicine | Saint Louis | Missouri |
United States | Pacific Hematology Oncology Associates | San Francisco | California |
United States | Mayo Clinic - Scottsdale | Scottsdale | Arizona |
United States | Seattle Cancer Care Alliance | Seattle | Washington |
United States | Stamford Hospital | Stamford | Connecticut |
United States | NorthWest Medical Specialties, PLLC | Tacoma | Washington |
United States | H. Lee Moffit Cancer Center | Tampa | Florida |
United States | Arizona Oncology Associates, PC | Tucson | Arizona |
United States | Texas Oncology | Tyler | Texas |
United States | Georgetown University Medical Center | Washington | District of Columbia |
United States | The Oncology Institute of Hope and Innovation | Whittier | California |
United States | University of Mass Medical School | Worcester | Massachusetts |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Halozyme Therapeutics |
United States,
Hingorani SR, Zheng L, Bullock AJ, Seery TE, Harris WP, Sigal DS, Braiteh F, Ritch PS, Zalupski MM, Bahary N, Oberstein PE, Wang-Gillam A, Wu W, Chondros D, Jiang P, Khelifa S, Pu J, Aldrich C, Hendifar AE. HALO 202: Randomized Phase II Study of PEGPH20 P — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Progression-Free Survival (PFS) | PFS: time from randomization until first occurrence of disease progression, either by central radiologic determination (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours [RECIST] version 1.1) or by clinical progression determined by Investigator, or death during treatment period from any cause. Radiological disease progression was defined as at least a 20 percent (%) increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study thus far, nadir (this included baseline sum if that was the smallest on study); Sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 millimeters (mm); Appearance of one or more new lesions; Unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Surviving participants without disease progression were censored for PFS analysis at the date of last evaluable post-baseline tumor assessment. Surviving participants without any post-baseline disease assessment were censored on Day 1. PFS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier (KM) method. | From the date of randomization until disease progression or death from any cause (maximum exposure: 30.72 months for PAG, and 20.27 months for AG) | |
Primary | Percentage of Participants in the PAG Arm Who Experienced Any Thromboembolic (TE) Event in Stage 2 of the Study | TE events were identified by applying the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) Standardized MedDRA Queries (SMQ) search strategy for 3 SMQs: TE arterial, TE venous, and TE vessel type unspecified and mixed arterial and venous. TE events were considered by the Sponsor to be adverse events (AEs) of special interest. All TE events, regardless of type of event, severity, or seriousness were reported. Participants with multiple events were counted only once. A summary of serious and all other non-serious adverse events regardless of causality is located in the 'Reported AE section'. | From first exposure to any study drug (PEGPH20, NAB, GEM) through 30 days after end of treatment visit (maximum exposure: 30.72 months for PAG) | |
Secondary | PFS in Relation to Tumor Hyaluronan (HA) Levels | PFS was defined as time from randomization until first occurrence of disease progression, either by central radiologic determination (RECIST version 1.1) or by clinical progression determined by Investigator, or death during treatment period from any cause. Disease progression was defined as at least a 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study thus far, nadir (this included baseline sum if that was the smallest on study); Sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm; Appearance of one or more new lesions; Unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Surviving participants without disease progression were censored for PFS analysis at the date of last evaluable post-baseline tumor assessment. Surviving participants without any post-baseline disease assessment were censored on Day 1. PFS was estimated using KM method. PFS was measured in HA-high and HA-low participants. | From the date of randomization until disease progression or death from any cause (maximum exposure: 30.72 months for PAG, and 20.27 months for AG) | |
Secondary | Objective Response Rate (ORR): Percentage of Participants With Objective Response | ORR was defined as percentage of participants who achieved either a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) regardless of confirmation, as assessed by RECIST version 1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions; Any pathological or non-pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to less than (<) 10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. | From the date of randomization until last date on study treatment (maximum exposure: 30.72 months for PAG, and 20.27 months for AG) | |
Secondary | Overall Survival | Overall survival was defined as the time from randomization until death from any cause. Participants who died or were lost to follow-up by the date of analysis data cutoff were censored at their last contact date. | From randomization until death from any cause (maximum exposure: 30.72 months for PAG, and 20.27 months for AG) | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants With AEs | An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. AEs included both SAEs and non-serious AEs. A summary of other non-serious AEs and all SAEs, regardless of causality is located in the 'Reported AE section'. | From first exposure to any study drug (PEGPH20, NAB, GEM) through 30 days after end of treatment visit (maximum exposure: 30.72 months for PAG and 20.27 months for AG) | |
Secondary | Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of PEGPH20 | Samples were analyzed for PEGPH20 concentration using a validated electrochemiluminescence immunoassay. Plasma samples to assess the potential effects of NAB+GEM on PEGH20 pharmacokinetic (PK) were collected in the PAG treatment group in the run-in phases (Run-in Phase 1: Original PEGPH20 formulation [3.5 mg/mL], and Run-in Phase 2: New PEGPH20 formulation [0.3 mg/mL]). | Pre-PEGPH20 dosing and 15 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, and 4 hours post-PEGPH20 dosing on Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1 | |
Secondary | Time to Reach Cmax (Tmax) of PEGPH20 | Samples were analyzed for PEGPH20 concentration using a validated electrochemiluminescence immunoassay. Plasma samples to assess the potential effects of NAB+GEM on PEGH20 PK were collected in the PAG treatment group in the run-in phases (Run-in Phase 1: Original PEGPH20 formulation [3.5 mg/mL], and Run-in Phase 2: New PEGPH20 formulation [0.3 mg/mL]). | Pre-PEGPH20 dosing and 15 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, and 4 hours post-PEGPH20 dosing on Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1 | |
Secondary | Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUC0-last) of PEGPH20 | Samples were analyzed for PEGPH20 concentration using a validated electrochemiluminescence immunoassay. Plasma samples to assess the potential effects of NAB+GEM on PEGH20 PK were collected in the PAG treatment group in the run-in phases (Run-in Phase 1: Original PEGPH20 formulation [3.5 mg/mL], and Run-in Phase 2: New PEGPH20 formulation [0.3 mg/mL]). | Pre-PEGPH20 dosing and 15 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, and 4 hours post-PEGPH20 dosing on Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1 |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT04753879 -
Multi-agent Low Dose Chemotherapy GAX-CI Followed by Olaparib and Pembro in Metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Cancer.
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT01417000 -
Safety and Efficacy of Combination Listeria/GVAX Immunotherapy in Pancreatic Cancer
|
Phase 2 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT02975141 -
Afatinib and Gemcitabine/Nab-paclitaxel in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer
|
Phase 1 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT00761345 -
Study of Low-Dose Fractionated Radiotherapy in Patients With Locally Advanced Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT00919282 -
Gemcitabine (GFF) in Patients With Pancreatic Cancer
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT01088815 -
Hedgehog Inhibitors for Metastatic Adenocarcinoma of the Pancreas
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT04133155 -
Retrospective Analysis of 2nd-line Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine After 1st-line FOLFIRINOX in Pancreatic Cancer
|
||
Withdrawn |
NCT05251038 -
Study of Sotorasib Combined With Chemotherapy for Second Line Treatment of Pancreas Cancer
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04612530 -
PANFIRE-3 Trial: Assessing Safety and Efficacy of Irreversible Electroporation (IRE) + Nivolumab + CpG for Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT03602885 -
EL CENTRO: Engaging Latinos in the Center of Cancer Treatment Options
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05442749 -
Niraparib as First Line Therapy With Metastatic Homologous Repair-deficient Pancreatic Cancer
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04222413 -
Metarrestin (ML-246) in Subjects With Metastatic Solid Tumors
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT03721744 -
A Study of GB201 in Combination With Weekly Paclitaxel and Low-dose Gemcitabine in Patients With Pancreatic Cancer
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT03261947 -
A Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Activity of TAK-931 in Participants With Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer, Metastatic Colorectal Cancer, and Other Advanced Solid Tumors
|
Phase 2 | |
Withdrawn |
NCT06017323 -
Proglumide With Gemcitabine and Nab-Paclitaxel in PatientsWith Metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
|
Phase 1 | |
Terminated |
NCT01946646 -
Phase I Study of TS-1 With Concurrent Radiotherapy to Treat Pancreatic Cancer
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT01523457 -
Study of Modified FOLFIRINOX in Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
|
Phase 2 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT00986661 -
A Study to Assess PV-10 Chemoablation of Cancer of the Liver
|
Phase 1 | |
Terminated |
NCT00726037 -
A Pilot Study, Evaluating the Efficacy of Regulatory T-cell Suppression by Ontak in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT00744640 -
Gemcitabine, Oxaliplatin and Capecitabine for Advanced Pancreatic Carcinoma
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 |