Evaluation of the Feasibility and Clinical Relevance of Liquid Biopsy in Patients With Suspicious Metastatic Lung Cancer

Metastatic Lung Cancer Clinical Trial

— LIBELULE  

Official title:

A Randomized Phase III Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Feasibility and Clinical Relevance of Liquid Biopsy in Patients With Suspicious Metastatic Lung Cancer

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT03721120
• Other study ID #: ET18-086 LIBELULE
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: April 10, 2019
• Est. completion date: July 1, 2023

Study information

• Verified date: August 2023
• Source: Centre Leon Berard
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Lung cancer is diagnosed at metastatic stage in 60% of the cases. For these patients, first-line treatment is based on histology and molecular characterization of non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Thus, quality and quantity of tumor tissue are crucial to determine the appropriate treatment (targeted therapies, chemotherapy and immunotherapy).

However, in routine practice, tissue quality and quantity can be limited (25%), resulting in the need for tumor rebiopsy for molecular analysis. Therefore, lung cancer patients often experience substantial delays before treatment initiation that may be associated with worse patient experience of subsequent cancer care and poorer clinical outcomes.

"Liquid biopsies" (LB) are used to detect genomic alterations in cell-free circulating DNA (cfDNA). Since very recently, they are routinely used in reference centers for the detection of EGFR-mutations when tissue is not sufficient for molecular characterization. Importantly, the feasibility and clinical relevance of systematic liquid biopsies in routine practice has never been evaluated in patients with suspicious advanced lung cancer.

Investigators hypothesize that using systematic LB in patients with clinical suspicion of metastatic lung cancer may reduce time-to-treatment initiation and avoid tissue rebiopsy.

Investigators performed a retrospective study including 250 NSCLC patients treated in a tertiary Cancer Center and in the University Hospital of Lyon, France. The mean time-to-appropriate frontline treatment initiation (TTI) was 42+/-22.5 days. With the use of LB at the time of first consultation, the investigators believe it is possible to reduce the mean TTI down to 33 days (21% reduction in TTI) in the overall population with suspicious metastatic lung cancer, including a 50% and 40% reduction in TTI for EGFR/ALK/ROS1/BRAF V600E subgroups and KRAS/LKB1/ERBB2/c-MET/BRAF non V600E subgroups, respectively.

Investigators therefore designed a "real-life" randomized study to evaluate the feasibility and clinical relevance of LB to decrease the TTI, which may in turn improve patients' outcome. Genomic analyses of circulating cfDNA will be performed using a robust and highly sensitive technology (InVision®), that profiles the presence of genomic aberrations in a panel of 35 genes including mutations, insertion/deletions and rearrangements, including all actionable alterations required to initiate the appropriate first-line therapy (EGFR-, ALK-, ROS1 and BRAF V600E).

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 319
• Est. completion date: July 1, 2023
• Est. primary completion date: July 1, 2023
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Age = 18 years;

• Patients with clinico-radiological suspicious presentation of stage IV lung cancer;

• No prior chemotherapy for locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC;

• Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status 0-2 (Appendix 2);

• Life expectancy > 12 weeks;

• No contraindication to systemic lung cancer treatment;

• Covered by a medical insurance;

• Signed informed consent prior to any study-specific procedure;

• No prior biopsy or cytology for lung cancer diagnosis.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Pregnant or breastfeeding women;

• Patient concurrently using other approved or investigational antineoplastic agents;

• Major concurrent disease affecting cardiovascular system, liver, kidneys, hematopoietic system or else considered as clinically important by the investigator and that could be incompatible with patient's participation in this trial or would likely interfere with study procedures or results;

• Prior history of malignancies other than study disease (except for basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin or carcinoma in situ of the cervix) unless the patient has been free of the disease for at least 3 years;

• Patient requiring tutorship or curatorship.

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Lung Neoplasms
• Metastatic Lung Cancer

Intervention

Diagnostic Test:
• InvisionFirst® molecular panel
During the first visit, liquid biopsy will be performed using the InVisionFirst® panel. Cytological or histological sampling will be planned. According to InVisionFirst® results, treatment will be initiated: regardless of cytological/histological and tissue molecular analysis in case of EGFR, BRAF V600E-mutation, ALK- or ROS1-rearrangement identified on InvisionFirst® panel. regardless of molecular characterization performed on tissue sample in case of ERBB2-, BRAF non V600E-, c-MET-, KRAS-,LKB1-, NTRK and/or RET mutation on InVisionFirst® panel. Treatment will be based on pathology results and if appropriate on PD-L1 level of expression. for patients with none of the previous alterations, treatment will be initiated after obtaining pathology results and genomic characterization from the tumor tissue analysis.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
France	Centre Hospitalier de Bayeux	Bayeux
France	Hopital Louis Pradel	Bron
France	Centre François Baclesse	Caen
France	Centre Maurice Tubiana	Caen
France	Infirmerie Protestante	Caluire et Cuire
France	Centre Hospitalier Public du Cotentin	Cherbourg
France	CH Les Oudairies	La Roche-sur-Yon
France	Centre Leon Berard	Lyon
France	Hôpital Privé Jean Mermoz	Lyon
France	Groupe Hospitalier de la région de Mulhouse et Sud-Alsace	Mulhouse
France	Centre Hospitalier Annecy Genevois	Pringy
France	CHRU Saint-Etienne	Saint-Étienne
France	Institut de Cancérologie Lucien Neuwirth	Saint-Priest-en-Jarez
France	Centre Paul Strauss	Strasbourg
France	Hôpital Nord-Ouest	Villefranche-sur-Saône
France	Médiôle Lyon-Villeurbanne	Villeurbanne

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Centre Leon Berard

Country where clinical trial is conducted

France, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Time-to-appropriate Treatment Initiation (TTI)	It is defined as the time between the date of randomization and the date of appropriate-treatment initiation (whatever the start date occurs before or after the biopsy results). As all the patients will receive an appropriate-treatment, no censored data are expected, thus the TTI will be analyzed as a continuous outcome. Appropriate treatment is defined as follow: Based on contributive results on tissue OR liquid biopsy: EGFR- or BRAF V600E-mutations, ALK- or ROS1- rearrangements: specific targeted therapies; None of the four previous alterations: investigator's choice (chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy or targeted therapies based on pathology results, PD-L1 expression and access to therapies in the context of Temporary Used Authorization or clinical trials); In case of non-contributive results on tissue AND liquid biopsy: any treatment initiated by investigator (chemotherapy or immunotherapy based on pathology results and PD-L1 level of expression).	From date of randomisation to start date of appropriate treatment , assessed up to 12 months
Secondary	Rate of treatment initiated before molecular results	Defined as the proportion of patients with a treatment initiated without any available molecular results (tissue and liquid biopsy)	From date of randomisation to 12 months
Secondary	Time to availability of informative molecular pathology results	Defined as the time from randomization to date of availability of informative molecular pathology results (positive or negative).	From date of randomisation to date of molecular results, assessed up to 12 months
Secondary	Progression Free Survival (PFS)	Defined as the time from randomization to the date of the first documented clinical or radiological progression (as per RECIST version 1.1.) or death due to any cause.Patients who have not progressed or died at the time of analysis will be censored at the time of the latest date of assessment.	From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 30 months
Secondary	Incidence of diagnostic test-emergent adverse events	Safety assessed according to the National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) version5	From date of randomization to follow-up visit month 12 or death due to any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 30 months
Secondary	The impact of cancer on the patient's quality of life using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) quality-of-life core questionnaire (QLQ-C30)	64 questions related to cancer impact on health and daily activities composed this questionnaire. Each item has to be graded from 1 to 4 (1 = not at all, 4= very much). More the score is high, worst the quality of life is.	At baseline, at Day 21 post-baseline, at the time of treatment initiation (within 6 weeks after baseline), at 8 weeks post treatment initiation and every 3 months post initiation of treatment until 12 months
Secondary	Evaluation of lung cancer symptoms impact on health and daily activities using the Lung Cancer Symptoms Scale (LCSS) questionnaire	10 questions related to lung cancer symptoms impact on health and daily activities composed this questionnaire. Each item has to be graded from 1 to 10. More the score is high, worst the quality of life is.	At baseline, at Day 21 post-baseline, at the time of treatment initiation (within 6 weeks after baseline), at 8 weeks post treatment initiation and every 3 months post initiation of treatment until 12 months
Secondary	Evaluation of anxiety and depression level using Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD)Scale	6 questions related to anxiety and 6 questions related to depression composed this questionnaire. Each item has to be graded from 0 to 3. More the score of anxiety or depression is high, worst the quality of life is.	At baseline, at Day 21 post-baseline, at the time of treatment initiation (within 6 weeks after baseline), and at 8 weeks post treatment initiation
Secondary	Concordance between molecular status on tissue and liquid biopsies in the experimental arm	Evaluated by the proportion of discordances (error rates) between tissue and liquid biopsies for the mutational status.	From date of randomization to follow-up visit month 12 or death due to any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 30 months
Secondary	Biopsy avoidance rate in the experimental arm	Be defined as the proportion of patients with an initial non-informative tissue biopsy and an informative liquid biopsy allowing appropriate treatment initiation without need for tissue rebiopsy.	From date of randomization to follow-up visit month 12 or death due to any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 30 months
Secondary	The cost analysis	All costs items related to the stratégies and supported by the payers will be collected prospectively for each patient. Mean total costs will be calculated for the 2 stratégies and be compared between the arms.	From date of randomization to follow-up visit month 12 or death due to any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 30 months
Secondary	The effectiveness analysis using the EuroQoL 5 Dimensions 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L)	Preferences will be measured using EuroQoL 5 Dimensions 5 Levels questionnaire. Five attributes will therefore be investigated: mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each attributes having five levels (from "able to […]"/"no pain/discomfort/anxiety/depression" to "unable to […]"/ "extremely pain/discomfort/anxiety/depression"). More the patient is unable to doing daily activities and painful/anxious, worst the quality-adjusted life-year (QALYs) is.	At baseline, at Day 21 post-baseline, at the time of treatment initiation (within 6 weeks after baseline), at 8 weeks post treatment initiation and every 3 months post initiation of treatment until 12 months
Secondary	QALYS comparaison between 2 arms	Mean QALYs (based on EQ-5D-5L score) will be calculated for each arm and will be compared between the 2 arms.	At baseline, at Day 21 post-baseline, at the time of treatment initiation (within 6 weeks after baseline), at 8 weeks post treatment initiation and every 3 months post initiation of treatment until 12 months
Secondary	The budget impact analysis in experimental arm	The Liquid biopsy using the InVisionFirst® cost, the evolution of market shares, the data pertaining to the target population, and the costs involved with treating the pathologies will be analysed to to estimate the budget impact on the French National Health Insurance of the generalization of innovative Liquid biopsy using the InVisionFirst® panel strategy.	From date of randomization to follow-up visit month 12 or death due to any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 30 months
Secondary	Exploratory objectives : Whole-exome sequencing	Additional mandatory 10 ml DNA STRECK tubes will be collected for patients signing study consent.	At baseline, at the time of treatment initiation (within 6 weeks after baseline), at 8 weeks after the treatment initiation, and at the progression if occured within 12 month post-baseline.
Secondary	Exploratory objectives : miRNA profiling	Additional mandatory 10 ml RNA STRECK tubes will be collected for patients signing study consent.	At baseline, at the time of treatment initiation (within 6 weeks after baseline), at 8 weeks after the treatment initiation, and at the progression if occured within 12 month post-baseline.